With a parliamentary debate on Pakistan-US ties around the corner, the civil and military leaderships have struck a rigid tone in public. However, the eagerly-awaited recommendations by a parliamentary panel, which are expected to form the base of this debate, are mostly open-ended, The Express Tribune has learnt.
Tasked by the prime minister to review ties with the US completely in the wake of a Nato cross-border air raid on Pakistani border posts, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) has touched upon almost all issues in its recommendations, but has left the final decisions on a couple of important issues – including the likely resumption of Nato supplies – up to the government.
An official privy to these recommendations, now lying on the desk of Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, said that, although the committee has emphasised the guarding of sovereignty in general, it has not given any clear-cut policy advice on issues such as drone attacks.
“Just like we have certain red lines, the United States also has such redlines and it has already made it clear that stopping drone attacks will have a negative impact on the war on terror,” the official said.
However, the committee, which met and was briefed by a number of key stakeholders, including the foreign minister as well as military officials, before drawing up the report, has given some specific guidelines. One issue on which it is specific is the use of Pakistani bases by foreign militaries. The official said that, according to recommendations of the committee, no future government will allow Pakistani bases to be used by any other country without prior approval of parliament.
There is also no clear-cut recommendation on whether or not to resume supply routes for US-led forces in Afghanistan. The routes were closed following the cross-border attack in November last year that left two dozen Pakistani soldiers dead.
“The committee has proposed placing effective monitoring systems (for Nato supplies) at the entry and exit points. There are also recommendations to revise the charges for this service but the final decision has been left for the government to make (if and when to resume the supply routes),” sources said.
Contrary to the general perception that the US has been greatly affected due to the closure of the land routes in Pakistan, sources said, the ban has affected the forces of 19 other countries whose troops are in Afghanistan. “The US still has reserve supplies for around 100 days. The other Western countries are more affected and they are pressing Pakistan to resume the supply routes,” an official said.
Though the government is likely to resume supply routes, it will be difficult to get a unanimous parliamentary nod for such a decision. Religious parties, including the Jamat-e-Islami, have already announced to hold a sit-in in front of the Parliament House if the government takes any such step.
The government said that it had put on hold relations with the US till the finalisation of a fresh policy in line with the recommendations of parliament. It has also turned down a scheduled visit to Pakistan by US envoy Marc Grossman earlier this year. The government is yet to finalise the date for a joint parliamentary session to discuss Pak-US relations, which is now expected on February 6 instead of February 2, as was planned earlier.
The recommendations of the PCNS were to be at the heart of this debate.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Harry Stone: Isn't US now talking to the Taliban (The Terrorist Taliban) in QATAR - Taliban has got their office open in Qatar now :) are they not terrorist now or they are suddenly become innocent or should I say GOOD TALIBAN :)
@Harry Stone: there were no talibans in pak before russia invaded afghanistan and US wanted pak to bring talibans to fight russia out of afghanistan, now these terrorists have become proxies for US to play with in this region, pakistan provided refuge to thier families and is now blamed for harbouring 4 million displaced afghan due to series of wars by super powers, the irony is one super power doesnt learn from the other and keep getting defeated yet they try thier luck and destroying the whole country again and again beyond physical and psycological repairs. The day americans leave afghanistan it will find some sort of system itself, please dont reply to my comment by yapping about american version of democracy, we have seen a lot of that in iraq.
@Mohammad Ali Siddiqui:
Yes all those poor inoncent people. In PAK the position of PAK everyone is innocent. There are no terrrorist in PAK and PAK does not support terrorism.
For the other nations that are in Afk, I believe most of those nations are the same ones PAK needs support from. Then again that might not be obvious to your everyday PAK.
@Mirza: says - Which third world country has such huge army and expensive WMD in the world? Answer: North Korea - i guess? Need more answers?
What is the difference between 'Other countires' and US? nothing; they are all killing Pakistanis and Muslims.
We all know that governments will play the 'differentiation' game whenever there a change afoot. Therefore........LOOK OUT! NATO trucks are coming.
The operative word is LEADERSHIP - seems to be lacking in Pakistan.
The Ghairat Brigade has to break the begging bowl and start returning all the foreign debt before we could be a chooser. Pakistan with its huge army and expenses is in no shape to bargain with the US. Which third world country has such huge army and expensive WMD in the world?
Being a Pakistani citizen, it is my duty to protect the mother land and while one protect the motherland, the first consideration is to protect the country and simultaneously the citizens.
One should admit the fact that despite after a lapse of 11 long years, US and its allies cannot win the war on terror in Afghanistan and I don’t foresee that US and its allies will ever be able to win the war on terror in Afghanistan.
What about the innocent people who are killed in the drone attacks on Pakistan? Unfortunately, the killings of innocent Pakistanis are called a collateral damage.
US and 19 other countries cannot press the civil or military leaders of Pakistan to open road supplies of NATO and at the same time US continue drone attacks to kill the terrorists.
What about the innocent people who are killed in the drone attacks on Pakistan? Unfortunately, the killings of innocent Pakistanis are called a collateral damage.
Is there any Pakistani in the civil leadership who has the ability to look into the eyes of US, ball to ball and ask US to stop making fool of Pakistani authorities.
The loud 'band baja' has stopped and as the saying goes 'empty vessels make the most sound.' How true. Now the West will laugh even more at us. The Pakistan armed forces are more determined than these big noise, talk show guests. The people elected to the Parliament are nothing more than 'angootha chaaps.' Maybe they should join the PCB cricket team and learn some of their spin bowling tactics. Salams