
The Airblue crash report did at times read like a cover-up rather than a true investigation. The report described the young, inexperienced co-pilot as someone who was too scared to contradict the senior pilot, even though he knew that the latter was endangering the lives of the passengers. It seems scarcely believable that the co-pilot would fear a dressing-down from the pilot more than he would the possibility of losing his own life. The report also claimed that both the pilot and co-pilot were not fasting, hence their reflexes and concentration were not affected. How they came about this information is not revealed. Also, missing from the report, or at least the version of it released to the public, is the full transcript of the cockpit voice recorder and digital flight data recorder. These may shed some light on the causes of the crash and so need to be released for public scrutiny.
The PHC, meanwhile, is ensuring that it is not only Airblue but the entire aviation industry that is held accountable. It has directed PIA to prove that its aircraft are safe — a review that is sorely needed after a spate of recent incidents. The court is also taking a proactive role in ensuring that Airblue pays compensation to all families of the victims. Thus far, Airblue has only paid out compensation if recipients have agreed not to pursue further damages in court. If the PHC continues on its crusade, justice, both emotional and financial, may finally prevail.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ