This was claimed by Agri Forum Pakistan chairman Muhammad Ibrahim Mughal while talking to media men on Thursday. Presently input costs for agriculture, livestock, fisheries and poultry are three times higher in Pakistan than in India due to which, Pakistani agricultural produce is expensive in the market, Mughal claimed.
The Agri Forum Chairman stated that the lobby behind declaring India as Most Favored Nation (MFN) should always remember that the cost of agriculture is two to three times higher in Pakistan than India. India was extending Rs1300 billion (in Pak rupee) annual subsidy to its agricultural sector to keep input cost lower. There is no such law or steps taken by the government in Pakistan in this regard, he added.
He said that if growers in Pakistan are given diesel and electricity on rates at par with that in India, prices of agricultural commodities could be lowered by 25 per cent in Pakistan. It would also help increasing the per acre yield, they said.
Ibrahim Mughal said that even India could not extend such a large subsidy to its agricultural sector under the WTO. Mughal suggested that the lobby pushing for the MFN status should first exert pressure on India to withdraw subsidy to its agricultural sector. If input costs in both the countries are brought at par then there was no harm in opening trade, he concluded.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732486769-0/image-(8)1732486769-0-270x192.webp "lahore s smog lessons to be learnt")
we realize that india cared a lot for this MNF thing since last 10 years, I am listening that India is asking for this status and now you say that you dont need it, other thing that its bigger issue inside Pakistan ...as our farmers will bear the brunt so forum concern is seems to be for Pakistani farmers that Pak govt should learn from india and give subsidies like that the last part is nothing else than to justify the first argument....hope you will understand ..
Why don't you just follow the treaty -- you don't get to pick and choose which sections of the treaty you wish to follow. If you think that India is illegally subsidizing it's agri business then take to the IMF for resolution - of course India may file a counter claim and you should be prepared to defend your own subsidy/price control program.