In Islamabad, the beginnings of critical discourse and dialogue take shape

Published: December 31, 2011
Email
Intellectuals gather
for bi-weekly
lectures to learn
from modern
philosophy, history.

Intellectuals gather for bi-weekly lectures to learn from modern philosophy, history.

ISLAMABAD: 

When Ashfaq Saleem Mirza, a writer and an intellectual, initiated a lecture series on modern philosophy and history, he was acutely aware of the gap in discourse and dialogue in such areas of study and thought.

Even formal schooling is strongly influenced by Islamic ideals and biased Pakistani interpretation leads to a lot of information loss. Subjects such as Islamiat tend to be preached instead of taught and history portrays Pakistanis as either victims or winners.

This is precisely what the interactive lectures aim to address. According to Mirza, “the real objective of this informal school is to enlighten Pakistanis to think in comprehensive and critical ways.”

The fourth instalment of the series on Thursday, for instance, focused on politics and political thought in the 16th century Europe, particularly on Machiavelli.

Around 15 people attended the lecture, including former ambassadors Arif Ayub and Commodore Iftikhar Shafi, prominent lawyer Rehman Qureshi, Waseem Sheikh, Dr Najeeba Arif and German scholar Hans Fry.

During the discussion, they compared Machiavelli’s “The Prince” to the Arthashastra, a treatise from the Mauryan Empire on statecraft, economic policy military strategy.

The lecture was in line with Mirza’s aim to compare the 15th and 16th century Europe to Pakistan. As he said, “We are in a similar situation as 15th century Europe right now, so it is important to understand the salient features of that civilisation and try to interpret them [in the context of] our society.”

However, he notes a disparity between European and Pakistan’s history. “In Europe, first knowledge was in the control of seminaries, then the state took over and then it fell in to the hands of citizens which aided development. In Pakistan knowledge never truly made it to the citizens.”

Speaking about the idea behind the series, Mirza gives the example of the recent floods and earthquakes being interpreted as punishment for sins by most Pakistanis and compares it to similar primitive understanding of the 13th century Black Death of Europe. He stressed that studying history tells us that the scientific and critical reasons for such phenomenon can greatly aid in development.

Urdu professor Dr Ravish Nadeem made similar comparisons to European history citing the French Revolution as an example. “Prior to the French revolution there were various clubs that emerged where intellectuals would discuss philosophies and actions. These intellectuals were in fact at the forefront of the revolution. So how can a revolution in Pakistan emerge without any discourse?”

Nadeem said that people need to learn to question the accounts of history that are presented and to interpret the present from their own viewpoints instead of a book-learnt opinion. He also noted that one of the only thinkers periodically present in school syllabi is Allama Iqbal and while his contributions are timeless, there is need to introduce other thinkers, both contemporary and classical, and present their philosophies in a space that is open to deconstruction.

Intellectual, poet and columnist Haris Khaleeq added, “Religious ideology is the only discourse patronised in Pakistan but it is not supported by theory or dialogue — only rhetoric. The same kind of hollowness is present in the politics of the educated middle class supporting Imran Khan, there is no theory, just rhetoric.”

In the lectures so far, Khaleeq said, there is a strong emphasis on critical thinking and theory. While Mirza himself is a Marxist Dialectical scholar, he is always very open to everyone’s opinions, encouraging diversity and it is this sort of open dialogue that is strongly missing and needed.

The lectures take place every fortnight at the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Building in F-8/1 at 5pm and are open to everyone free of charge.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 31st, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (4)

  • Non conformist
    Dec 31, 2011 - 7:36AM

    A timely initiative. However, the scope of the attendees needs to be broadened.It would be great if the organizers upload the transcript of the discourse on a website.

    Recommend

  • aaam sheri
    Dec 31, 2011 - 7:51AM

    finally a ray of light at the end of the tunnel , we need to focus more on science and nature instead of fetching fixed -biased religious sermons into our tiny brains .i hope this is the initiation of the great step . more should follow ..

    Recommend

  • Shadman Khan
    Dec 31, 2011 - 11:21AM

    I think its about time we should stop only focusing on science and positivist studies and rather also focus on interpretivist studies to enhance our deep insights and to be reflective and reflexive upon our own and each others work to advance our discourse and thus develop a competitive advanced rhetoric. The ability to socially and critically deconstruct is an essential skill which us Pakistanis need to develop so that we dont accept “reality” as it is without deep mining it.

    “There is no such thing as a view from nowhere but always a view from somewhere”

    Shadman Khan
    Msc Advanced Marketing Management
    Lancaster University

    Recommend

  • Arshad Habib
    Jan 1, 2012 - 7:33PM

    Knowledge is not a predefined object that was passed on, neatly, from one institution to another in Europe. It was a highly complex and dynamic process of self-understanding through which human knowledge came into existence. However, unlike past, (many) thinkers did not seek an extra-human reference for interpretation and conceptualization in post-enlightenment period. Also, market forces played an immensely important role in the emergence of a bourgeois intelligentsia in Europe. It was through this knowledge that they saw and perceived ‘others’ and, unfortunately, the West’s ‘others’ fell into the trap of hiring and applying West’s models and paradigms without any serious attempt of ‘self-understanding’. While the disappointment with the narrative of ‘progress’ can be clearly spotted in Europe, we can learn from their mistakes as well success.
    I personally think that our post-colonial society is going through the pains of self-understanding and is producing conflicting responses: local and global; modern/secular/liberal and religious/traditional. However this forum and the series of lectures by Ashfaq sahib must be appreciated that will certainly alleviate this painful process and it is in these endeavors that our future hope resides.

    Arshad Habib
    PhD (Peace Studies Centre, Bradford University, UK)

    Recommend

More in Pakistan