Gas supply: Fertiliser, CNG lobbies beat back power companies

Published: December 25, 2011
The power plants at Jamshoro and Kotri have valid agreements to receive 90 mmcfd and 25 mmcfd respectively from SSGC, but have been receiving nothing. PHOTO: FILE

The power plants at Jamshoro and Kotri have valid agreements to receive 90 mmcfd and 25 mmcfd respectively from SSGC, but have been receiving nothing. PHOTO: FILE


Strong lobbying efforts by the compressed natural gas (CNG) and fertiliser sector has resulted in more than 600 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) being diverted from power plants to those sectors, and resulted in a nearly-fold jump in the cost of electricity production.

The gas being diverted is from power plants owned by state-owned electricity generation companies. These companies need about 735 mmcfd to run their power plants, but during the entire duration of 2011, the maximum amount they have gotten on any given day has been 300 mmcfd. As of Saturday, that supply is down to 100 mmcfd, being supplied only to the Guddu power station in Sindh, which is supplied by the dedicated Mari gas field.

As a result of this policy, these power plants have been forced to shift their fuel source to furnace oil, the prices of which have jumped 72% to Rs76,000 per ton over that period. The cost of production has gone up from just over Rs5 per kilowatt-hour to Rs18 per unit. This policy affects power plants capable of producing about 3,000 megawatts, or over one-quarter of the country’s power supply.

“The gap between the notified price (that which regulators allow the companies to charge consumers) and the cost of production has gone up by 40%. It used to 20%,” official sources told The Express Tribune.

Of the nine state-owned power plants owned that can run on gas, the two state-owned gas companies – Sui Northern Gas Pipelines and Sui Southern Gas Company – have gas supply agreements with seven. While some of those remain valid, others have lapsed and the gas companies have refused to extend them, forcing all of those plants to operate on more expensive fuel.

The power plants at Jamshoro and Kotri have valid agreements to receive 90 mmcfd and 25 mmcfd respectively from SSGC, but have been receiving zero. When contacted, Azeem Iqbal Sidiqqui, managing director of SSGC, claimed that the gas was not being supplied to those plants due to a shortage. Arif Hameed, managing director at SNGP, offered similar excuses.

The 33-megawatt power plant supplying electricity to Quetta has also not been receiving gas, Siddiqui admitted, for the same reason. Meanwhile, the large 1,550-megawatt plant at Guddu has been getting only 100 mmcfd compared to the 295 mmcfd that it needs. Even that gas is not being supplied by either SSGC or SNGP but rather the Mari Gas Company.

About 120 mmcfd has been diverted to Fatima Fertilizers. The Water and Power Development Authority, which is the government agency responsible for all state-owned power generation, has an agreement with SSGC to provide 40 mmcfd from a new gas field owing to the diversion to the fertiliser sector, but this new gas supply has yet to be supplied.

The 210-megawatt thermal power plant at Faisalabad, another 120-megawatt plant in Faisalabad  and the 120-megawatt plant in Multan also have valid agreements for gas supply but have been getting none at all. The cost of production at the Faisalabad has jumped from Rs6 per unit to Rs26 per unit. The 1,450-megawatt Kot Addu Power Company’s gas supply agreement expired in December 2008 and has not been renewed since.

As a result of these measures, unless the government passes on the full cost of power production to the consumers (an unlikely scenario close to an election year), the government’s cost of subsidies will jump dramatically, forcing the government to slash the development budget, borrow heavily from the banks and print money, causing inflation.

In addition, it is likely that the stock of circular debt – the hundreds of billions of rupees in outstanding liabilities that have financially crippled the energy sector – will likely increase, further exacerbating the energy crisis.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 25th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • talat azmi
    Dec 25, 2011 - 10:27AM

    we are with the government and understand its difficulties.Recommend

  • gp65
    Dec 25, 2011 - 12:38PM

    Thsi policy of robbing Peter to pay Paul cannot continue indefinitely. The root causes have to be addressed sooner rather than later.


  • AS
    Dec 25, 2011 - 12:39PM

    CNG Lobby vs. Fertilizer Lobby vs. IPP vs. Domestic Users vs. Government
    If one emerges successful – the other will suffer if not fail.
    This is the truth.


  • Interconnect
    Dec 25, 2011 - 7:06PM

    This is governance issue. Dis-honoring contractual obligations to the consumer from utilities. Contracts/agreements breached by Gas companies. Who is at fault. Who is responsible for the circular debt. Hubco Power dispute and fall out, by penalising the consumers. with higher rates. We are civilised society.


  • Dec 26, 2011 - 3:28AM

    Well of course they are going to divert gas to those who can PAY. The power companies are unable to meet their obligations so they get cut off. What did you expect? Passing this story of as a conspiracy by the CNG and fertilizer lobbies is just a case of selling the news.


More in Pakistan