Gilani violated oath by criticising army: Shahbaz

Punjab CM, who has rarely criticised the PM, says Gilani had committed treason.


Abdul Manan December 23, 2011

LAHORE: If Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif has disagreed with Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, he has managed to maintain his silence.

But, in a rare occurence on Friday, Shahbaz lashed out at Gilani over remarks that the premier recently made about the Pakistan Army, saying it was a violation of the spirit of the oath that he has taken as the chief executive of the country.

The PM, speaking in the National Assembly on Thursday, made a direct reference and hit out at the military establishment, and said that a “state within [a] state will not be acceptable,” referring to the military’s dominance in the country’s affairs.

While most quarters hailed Gilani’s audacious speech, Shahbaz criticised the fact that for the first time in Pakistan’s history, a chief executive has severely censured the Pakistan Army. “He has committed treason and violated his oath.”

In a blanket criticism of the Pakistan Peoples Party leadership, Shahbaz said it was “unfortunate” that the rulers of Pakistan were using such language against its own army as has been used by the “worst enemies” of the country.

“The rulers’ anti-Pakistan statements show their deliberate efforts to strengthen the hidden and apparent hands of the country’s enemies who are hatching conspiracies against the country,” he said.

Switching his focus to Gilani, Shahbaz said that the PM’s remarks were a deliberate move to damage and harm the country’s interest to “appease” the country’s enemies. “But, the Pakistani people are well aware of the nefarious intentions of the country’s rulers and will hold them accountable.”

Sources within the PML-N say that Sharif’s written statement has been issued in a calculated manner. Shahbaz’s relationship with Gilani is considered more cordial than that PM’s relations with the rest of the Sharif family. Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz has reportedly assigned a specific role to Shahbaz – criticise President Asif Ali Zardari – and has even given Shahbaz the go-ahead to hold a public rally in Lahore on October 28, where he is expected to target Zardari.

Meanwhile, Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah also took an aim at Gilani, saying that he should mend his bad governance instead of criticising the Pakistan Army. “The chief executive has full powers and instead of issuing statements against the army, he should have terminated the extensions in the tenures of the army and ISI chiefs,” he said, adding that Gilani should address party matters before questioning the credibility of the country’s institutions.

COMMENTS (22)

skakrullah khan | 11 years ago | Reply

What is the justification for this outrageous comment by Mian Shahbaz ? In fact , the PM has fulfilled his constitutional obligation to caution the leadership of Armed Forces not to create a state within the state----- a most blatant violation of constitution . For years the Khaki leadership treats the legitimate civil authorities as superfluous non-entities in shaping and conducting the important aspects of our foreign relations . It swallows a major and hefty chunk of national budget , defying the the right of the parliament to scrutinise it . It defies to be accountable for terrible midadventures such as kargil . It has consistently sabotaged all initiatives of civil governments to normalise our relatioship with India which is crucial for peace and welfare of people of Pakistan . One can go on with the constitutional aberrations of the Khaki leadership . Gilani deserves appreciation for picking up courage to tell tke Khaki to show some respect for the constitional order of the state .We need to hear more of such bold voices telling the Khakis to act as servants of people of pakistan , not their masters .

antanu | 11 years ago | Reply

and what about Nawaz Sharif lashing at Army at every given chance?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read