American and Western officials on the condition of anonymity told New York Times that retaliation from allied forces of US and Afghanistan was justified because the Pakistani forces initiated the fire.
The officials revealed that Nato did not inform Pakistan that they were about to launch an operation on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. This resulted in the Pakistani forces opening fire on them.
The Wall Street Journal said that the military investigation revealed that the US-led forces had presumed that no personnel from the Pakistani forces were present when they launched the operation.
A US military official also said that “the overarching issue that surrounds this incident is a lack of trust” between the US and Pakistan.
Revelations from the military probe, placing blame on both the US and Pakistani forces, could further enrage Islamabad as, since the incident, Pakistan has maintained that the move on its part was justified and that Pakistani forces did not fire the first shots.
The American and Western officials said that the US military investigation report also shunned the accusations from Pakistani forces were “intentionally and repeatedly” targeted by the allied forces on November 26.
The officials also revealed that the United States Central Command had planned not to release the findings from the investigation this week because they were still in the phase of deciding what parts of the investigation could be made public and which should remain classified.
In Washington last week, a Pakistan embassy official said Nato forces could not have mistaken the two border posts on the Afghan border for bases of the Taliban as they stood on high ground and had structures.
The Pakistani official had declined to speculate on the US motivations for any alleged deliberate attack.
Inadequate coordination, incorrect mapping caused NATO airstrike: DoD
The United States (US) Department of Defense's (DoD) investigation into the airstrike on November 26 that led to the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers says “inadequate coordination by US and Pakistani military officers operating through the border coordination center,” including the US’ reliance on “incorrect mapping information shared with the Pakistani liaison officer -- resulted in a misunderstanding about the true location of Pakistani military units.”
In a press release issued to announce the completion of the investigation into the airstrike, DoD said that there were other gaps in information as well about the units’ placement that led to this incident.
The Nato airstrike on November 26 on the Pak-Afghan border has led to a near breakdown in relations. Following the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers in the incident, Pakistan closed down Nato supply routes, asked US to vacate the Shamsi Airbase in Balochistan, and has demanded that the relationship be redefined.
According to the report, the US investigating officer found that the US forces acted in self defense, “given what information they had available at the time.”
The investigating officer found that the US forces had responded with “appropriate force after being fired upon.”
The report into the incident also says that “there was no intentional effort to target persons or places known to be part of the Pakistani military, or to deliberately provide inaccurate location information to Pakistani officials.”
The US Department of Defense says that the results of the investigation have been sent to the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan as well as to the key Nato leadership.
“For the loss of life -- and for the lack of proper coordination between US and Pakistani forces that contributed to those losses -- we express our deepest regret. We further express sincere condolences to the Pakistani people, to the Pakistani government, and most importantly to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who were killed or wounded,” said the Department of Defense.
The DoD has also said that they must work on improving the level of trust between US and Pakistan.
“Our focus now is to learn from these mistakes and take whatever corrective measures are required to ensure an incident like this is not repeated. The chain of command will consider any issues of accountability. More critically, we must work to improve the level of trust between our two countries. We cannot operate effectively on the border -- or in other parts of our relationship -- without addressing the fundamental trust still lacking between us. We earnestly hope the Pakistani military will join us in bridging that gap,” said the US DoD.
NATO says both sides committed mistakes, actions legitimate
Nato, while expressing its condolences to the families of those who lost their lives in the airstrike, says that their investigation has found that, “the combined international and Afghan force was initially fired upon by unidentified forces, then believed not to be Pakistani military, and legitimately responded in self-defence.”
“The investigation has ascertained that a series of mistakes were made on both sides in failing to properly co-ordinate their locations and actions, both before the operation and during the resulting engagement.”
Adding that the force did not knowingly fire at the Pakistani forces, Nato says “close air support was employed in self-defence in response to intense, heavy machine gun and mortar fire initiated by what turned out to be Pakistan forces near the border in the vicinity of Salala.”
Nato also says that after a review of its operational plan and communications, it did not knowingly target the Pakistani forces, and Nato’s actions were “legitimate within the Laws of Armed Conflict and within their Rules of Engagement.”
In its press release, Nato says that ISAF is reviewing the “manning, training, and certification of the Border Coordination Centres.
Nato added that they are working to improve liaison with the Pakistani forces, “we are determined to work harder to ensure these incidents do not occur.”
Earlier on Wednesday, on the issue of the NATO supply routes, Pentagon spokesperson Captain John F. Kirby told the Express Tribune, "To date, there has been no appreciable impact to logistics inside Afghanistan. Gen. Allen is confident that he can support the mission. That said, the supply routes through Pakistan are important, and we would certainly like them to re-open. That's a decision only the government of Pakistan can make."
_____________________________________________
[poll id="602"]
COMMENTS (35)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Now that Pak Army has taken their share of blame, Americans please unfreeze Pak Army's $700million aid.
@Malik: Who cares about the machine gun range? I know if I'm being fired at I'm not going to wait until I know I can be hit for sure to respond to it. As long as it's pointed in my general direction it would be all I'd care about. It's also highly unlikely the Pakistani side had some kind of magical ruler to judge the distance perfectly. It's not weapon range that would dictate them opening fire. It would be fired even before they came in range to make sure they can't get any closer than they already are if it's viewed as life or death aggression they're facing. It's all about soldier perception. Not your excuses.
"Pakistani soldiers dead : 24 , NATO (US) soldiers dead : 0 ."
Dozens or hundreds of NATO soldiers are believed to have died at the hands of Pakistani-supported insurgents. Does that count for something, or is it merely a "zero"?
Pakistani soldiers dead : 24 , NATO (US) soldiers dead : 0 . Blame being shared by both sides - considering the sides involved settlement seems about right.
So RAW/Afghan conspiracy was in fact a conspiracy in itself.
It's so easy to sell anything anti Indian in Pakistan.
I think, Pakistan's economy/industry/production/manufacturing sector will boom if they start manufacturing anti-India cars, anti-India hairpins, anti-India two wheelers, anti-India laptops, anti-India tooth picks, anti-India tooth paste, anti-India printers, anti-India paints, anti-India bricks, anti-India cement, anti-India tooth brush, anti-India cell phones, anti-India medicines, anti-India hard disks, anti-India kerchiefs, anti-India discs, anti-India cords, anti-India biriyanis, anti-India TVs...
@Mark: Your suggestion is a bit too late since the two different versions issued by US has already become some kind of a joke especially in stating involvement of RAW and Afghanis which the Americans visualised would go well with the Pakistanis was outrightly rejected by the ISPR. However Americans would be too naive to admit that it was a delibrate act to teach Pakistan a lesson.
@Agnostic Muslim: First of all, kudos on your nick. I didn't think an 'Agnostic Muslim' existed in this world. It is refreshing to know that he does.
@Ahsan J: Maybe that is the truth !! But then who wants to know the truth anyway.
Here is what I gather:
You are required to inform Pakistan in advance about patrols which you did not. You said you did not know where the Pakistani posts were but weren't they marked on the maps you had? So when you get there and you are fired upon because they don't know who you are because they were not informed. In return you bomb them for 2 hours.And the conclusion is that you share the blame for the attacks? Am I missing something?
And what is this white piece of cloth on the tree( shown in the photo)? Who put it up....our soldiers? If yes, then when did this happen....before or after our 25 soldiers were martyred?
@ Agnostic Muslim.............how is banning the BBC going to help us brother? We can choose to keep our eyes shut, but the whole world is watching us nevertheless.
@ wonderer..
Plz refer to this report below. I was led to believe it was the RAW and Afghans after all, who were responsible.....and the Americans were innocent. But here the Americans themselves are taking the blame! http://tribune.com.pk/story/308841/afghan-commander-orchestrated-nov-26-attack-report/
What will happen with the Pakistani liaison officer?
@ Afghan:
The ISPR immediately denied the 'RAW/Afghan conspiracy' - that story was a BBC issue, not a Pakistani one.
Perhaps Pakistan was justified in banning the BBC then, since we now have two examples of absolutely poor, biased and conspiratorial reporting from the BBC:
"Secret Pakistan "RAW and Afghan conspiracy to destroy US-Pak relations"We don't trust this report.
Wow The NATO and the American forces needed 2 hours of action to defend themselves against an Army much less equipped and trained. Yet being partners in the war they couldn't find time to communicate, lately it seems that NATO and the American have taken up the profession of Spinning stories..
It pretty much defies the conspiracy theories that the Afghans with their Indian friends actually prompted this incident. [Sighs]
By the way, the DoD report sounds realistic and based on the ground facts. The commanders on the ground do have this problem of inaccuracy with their maps and coordination. They can see everything from the sky but usually fail to identify structures and other terrain features.
Its "Actually DISGUSTING" to see how the American Media makes their people believe that "US is the GOOD-GUY and Rest-of-the-World are BAD GUYS"... And it uses different "PLOTS" for proving that in different regions. For Latin America and South America, they have the "DRUG Trade Baaooooo".... For Vietnam & Korea, they had/have "Communism Baaoooooo".... For Middle East (except the OILY Sheikh-doms), they have the "Democracy Baaooooo".... For Iraq, they had "WMDs Baaaooooo"..... For Afghanistan / Somalia / Yemen, they had/have "Al-Qaeda / Al-Shabab Baaooooo"..... For Iran, they have "Nuclear Baaooooo"..... For Pakistan, they have "Haqqanis + Nukes Baaooooo" ....... Why is America "At War" or "Preparing for War" with the WHOLE WORLD???
As predicted, the usual suspects on this site, when faced with information which doesn't fit their world view of conspiracies and evil designs, simply dismiss that information as false. No need to read the actual report rather than media summaries, no need to think about logic, motives, etc. Guys like helicopter, ju jitsu, whatever your names are, aren't fooling anyone. You are propagandists for extremism and anti-americanism, pure and simple.
What happened to that RAW/Afghan conspiracy? The US report states that Pakistani fired first. Who gave the orders to fire first, if indeed this is true? Who was the commanding officer? Both sides are covering up.
Ahh so again the ego comes into play.
@Mark
What have the Indians done?
A wise urdu quote goes like " ulta choor kotwal ko danty " after a blatant act of agression, NATO is trying to share the blame. The only solution to deal with US and NATO is diplomatic ut off. Lets bring China into our close quarters..
The history is the evidence that USA never accepted blame of their foolishness and aggression, whether it was Veitnam, Nuclear attack on Japan, A Big Lie of WMD, etc. etc. etc. I have left the smaller incidents like conspiracy to attack UK and its foreign arm in order to boost US economy etc.
US trying to cover the real issue. The real issue wasn't the border firing incident. The real issue was Aerial strike. They have preferred to ignore THAT real issue.
Just a joke. .
And we thought we could make them apologize? I mean please. A country where people lift off chairs from.... oh never mind :) hopeless.
another anonymous official from new york times which is known for its anti-pakistan bias.
bottomline is NATO/US deliberate attack killed 25 Pakistani soldiers in their well known checkpoint inside Pakistan territory for two hours.
Pak Army rightly said nothing was expected from this useless "investigation" by US.
What is this?! USA/NATO are claiming that they were responsible for the raid, albeit due to some communication gap. What does it say about the Pakistani investigation, where we are absolving the USA/NATO and pinning all the blame on Afghans and Indians? Is this the most convenient way out for us? If so, we must atleast alert the Americans, not to accept any part of the blame now. Otherwise, the whole thing will become a joke!
I am not pleased by the language used by DoD.. it some how puts blame on our end aswell.