Prime minister’s address

Published: December 15, 2011
Email
Gilani accused anti-democratic forces of being behind the memogate scandal and said that parliament should never accept military intervention. PHOTO: PID

Gilani accused anti-democratic forces of being behind the memogate scandal and said that parliament should never accept military intervention. PHOTO: PID

Ultimately, like just about every civilian government in Pakistan, the current set-up too may fall, but it is not going to go down without a fight. In his speech to the Senate on December 14, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, never before known as a fiery public speaker, got his point across rather well. He accused anti-democratic forces of being behind the memogate scandal and said that parliament should never accept military intervention in the democratic system. At a time when the government is at its most vulnerable, it was a stirring speech. In the past, civilian governments have given way too easily to military adventurists. If Gilani’s speech is any indication, the PPP government will not make the same mistake. But words alone, no matter how powerful, will not be enough to ward off a possible military coup. That Gilani felt the need to go to the Senate and deliver this speech was a strong indication that the government’s position is precarious. It still remains to be seen if this was a last-ditch stand by a prime minister who knows his days are numbered, or a warning to the military that it must back off. We now know that the PPP will not give up without a fight. However, it will not be successful unless it has the support of everyone else too. The other political parties, particularly the PML-N, must stand behind democracy, no matter how much it would like to see the PPP out of power. So far, PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif has been the foremost critic of the army; now that there’s a chance he could be the beneficiary of its meddling, he should not abandon civilian rule

Even more than the political parties, the fate of democracy in the country may rest on the shoulders of the Supreme Court. Surely, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and the other justices remember the treatment that was meted out to them by the previous military ruler, Pervez Musharraf. The court’s obvious distaste for the PPP government should not cause them to forget that they are the final guardians of the Constitution. Back in 1977, political forces in the country openly preferred a short period of military rule to the PPP government and thus, we were given a decade of Ziaul Haq. There is still time for a similar mistake to be averted now.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 16th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (3)

  • dar
    Dec 16, 2011 - 8:50AM

    railway ngines of this country are not pulling the trains, airline is grounded,institutions are bankrupt,this govt is not pulling the country……….This govt has absolutely no justificatio to carry on…

    Recommend

  • sharifL
    Dec 16, 2011 - 11:43AM

    Well written editorial.Things can only improve if majority accept democrcy as the best form of government. It appears it is either military, mullahs and now judsiciarry trying to measure its strength. Waiting for another year to see the elections should be taken as basis for all changes. If 64 years have been wasted, another few months will not demage the country. But Pakidstan being Pakistan, any day is a new addventure. Pakistan is like a child learning to walk; we should not disrupt this process. It is against nature and destroys the limited progress we have made.

    Recommend

  • MarkH
    Dec 16, 2011 - 5:00PM

    The military has it easy for support having a great deal of people whose purpose is to “follow orders” even if they disagree with it. The civilian government has it rough because of the style of politics performed by competition. They take their credibility and grind its face into the mud no matter what it takes which makes the people not just slightly divided but divided into a number of fractions that are at each others throat while the army remains a step outside that drama. They retain support of being a superficially separate entity that has been exagerrated to demi-god level over the years regardless of the facts. What they get in that area will probably be more than the civilian government can manage due to it unless people take notice of what the situation is and what they have to do.
    It’s the civilian’s support they need. Civilian support combined with a “we’ll go back to bickering after this is over because if we don’t set it aside, we’re just arguing about things that only have value if it exists tomorrow as well as today and that tomorrow is being threatened” agreement. The other political groups will follow when they realize that’s where the voter base is.

    Recommend

More in Editorial