Belgian honour killing: Pakistani family sentenced to prison

Sadia was shot at the age of 20 for refusing arranged marriage.


Afp December 12, 2011

BRUSSELS: A Belgian court sentenced on Monday four members of a Pakistani family to prison for the “honour killing” of their law-student daughter and sister, the Belgian media reported.

After pronouncing the family members guilty for shooting to death Sadia Sheikh in October 2007, the jury sentenced father Tarik Mahmood Sheikh to 25 years behind bars, mother Zahida Parveen Sariya to 20 years, brother Mudusar to 15 and sister Sariya to five years.

Lawyers for the family said Sadia’s brother, Mudassir, who confessed to pulling the trigger on the three bullets that killed his sister, was handed a lesser jail term than his parents as they were considered to have ordered the girl’s death.

Prosecutors had asked for a life sentence for all three and between 20 and 30 years behind bars for Sariya.

Sadia, who defied the family by living with a Belgian and refusing an arranged marriage, was shot dead at the age of 20 on October 22, 2007.

Mudassir admitted before the jury of five women and seven men to killing his sister while saying the rest of the family were not to blame.

Her parents and sister stood accused of aiding and abetting the killing which took place when the student visited her family in the hopes of patching up their quarrel.

Questioned during Belgium’s first “honour killing” trial in south-western Mons, Mudassir said the killing was premeditated “for a long time”.

The trial also involved rights groups pleading for gender equality as part of a civil suit at the hearings.

The father, mother and sister, also facing charges of “attempting to arrange a marriage”, denied involvement in the murder, saying Mudassir killed his sister in a fit of rage.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 13th, 2011.

COMMENTS (36)

G. Din | 12 years ago | Reply

@goggi: "vast minority"? This one is an oxymoron! "It is not long ago, when your holy Pandits and the rest of the society made similarly a short shrift with a widow and shoved her alive in her husband´s pyre……to save a bowl of rice a day?" It would have been a good idea if you had mentioned how long ago really was "long ago". Firstly, remember the institution of "sati" to which you are referring was not ordained by holy Pandits. It was in great majority of the cases a voluntary act. No one shoved any one intro a raging fire. But again, one cannot vouch for every case. It is also possible it was not so and it became obligatory because of societal pressures. "To save a bowl of rice a day"? It is highly laughable. Let us leave this without a response. The point is Hindu religion is highly flexible and adaptable, unlike Islam. That is why it has survived as long as it has. "Sati" is dead but how can you prevent someone from committing suicide even today because he/she could not bear to live without his/her beloved. Coming back to the question of executions, you have not responded to my poser:"You willing to stand on a high moral pedestal in return for just a minor portion of your earnings?". Well...., are you? Your Consciousness will determine your Being!

goggi | 12 years ago | Reply

@G. Din: I am the last to contradict a opinion which is below the belt, you represent the moral values of the vast majority of your nation...............just as the honour killer represented the moral standards of a vast minority of his country.

It is not long ago, when your holy Pandits and the rest of the society made similarly a short shrift with a widow and shoved her alive in her husband´s pyre......to save a bowl of rice a day?

Our Consciousness determines our Being!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ