Hate thy neighbour

Rubina Saigol July 23, 2010

It is axiomatic to say that domestic compulsions influence foreign policy, and external interests have an impact on domestic policies. The civil-military imbalance in Pakistan is inextricably connected with Pakistan’s relations with its neighbours. It is an open secret that the foreign, security and defence policies are framed by the establishment and not by the elected civilian governments.  The latter can only deviate from these at the risk of being ousted from government by another praetorian takeover.

The defence establishment in Pakistan has a major stake in the maintenance of neighbourly hatred which proves highly lucrative. Unless we have an enemy that we can conveniently invoke, demonise and conjure up at will, there would be no justification for the massive defence budget that is routinely passed without debate in parliament. India is a reliable enemy which can be deployed easily when we want to incite fear and a sense of threat among our people. The establishment has to simply spread the idea that this demon lurking on our borders is laced with a deadly arsenal that could wipe us out in minutes, were it not for our eternally prepared and alert armed forces to protect us from annihilation. We must, therefore, give them anything they ask without question if we want to survive. The weapons of mass deception  are the means utilised in this psychological and ideological war which elaborates upon the myriad characteristics of our eternal, immutable, permanent enemy. Civilian governments have little stake in hating our neighbour. It is costly. It leaves no money for development without which voters cannot be won. It hampers trade for the businessmen among our ruling classes. It limits economic growth from which our civilian ruling classes benefit. So we had Zulfikar Bhutto adroitly concluding the Simla agreement with Indira Gandhi after the army’s terrible mess in former East Pakistan. We had Benazir Bhutto making friendly overtures to Rajiv Gandhi in an effort to normalise relations before she was stopped dead in her tracks. We had Nawaz Sharif courting Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a Hindu nationalist who rode to Lahore on a bus in 1999 and visited the Minar-i-Pakistan, expressing his acceptance of the Pakistan idea.

The three services chiefs did not come to receive Vajpayee and instead the Kargil operation was launched in the summer of the same year, with Nawaz Sharif ultimately being catapulted out of power.  Recently, we saw Asif Ali Zardari reaching out to the Indians in a televised address and Yousaf Raza Gilani concluding talks in a very cordial atmosphere at Sharm El-Sheikh.  Yet, S M Krishna came and went without the peace dove flying triumphantly overhead.  Blame game and domestic compulsions on both sides aside, each time its is the powerful establishment which derails the process meant to overcome the division of waters, oceans, lands and mountains on either side of the tragic divide.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 24th, 2010.


SKChadha | 11 years ago | Reply @ MJ Ali, You have stated that Indians textbooks are equally rotten in fact worse. It is incorrect. Please let us also know about such stuff you have come accross in Indian Text Books or it is just hate mongering? The Indian's knowledge of Pakistan is from world mirror and based on hard facts. You may remain in denial mode of the facts and figures. Ali Sahib, saparation from India was nothing but political game of Muslim Legue and Congress at that time. Please read the history of partition from indipendent sources and not from Zia-ul-Haq's curriculum.
MJ Ali | 11 years ago | Reply Madam, we all want peace and prosperity, how we wish that Pakistan, India and Bangladesh had remained a single India and that there was no wastage of important and scarce resources. The reality is that the Indian establishment does not desire a stable peaceful Pakistan. We are the "backward barbarian terrorist" Muslims that they would very much like to dominate. Pakistani establishment definitely needs to be accountable and the budget transactions transparent to the extent possible. However, this stands for all Pakistani institutions and not just the military. Military needs to educate and train its soldiers better. Our politicians are not trained to lead, they are not trained to be servants of the people and there is a long long way before we will ever see our politicians deliver - though I wish our civilian democratically elected governments can achieve this before they destroy Pakistan. Lack of functioning institutions, lack of justice, lack of healthcare and good education an exploding population and mismanagement by politicians do not bode well for the future of this country. As far as the Indians are concerned their textbooks are equally rotten in fact worse. The average Indian's knowledge about Pakistan is extremely skewed and biased thanks to the accurate and dispassionate reporting by the Indian media. Peace is just wishful utopian thinking. Pakistan has been suffering from terrorism for the past 10 years and India has only helped aggravate the situation. In the freedom of past 60 plus years we have forgotten the price of freedom and forgotten our past and our reasons for separating from India.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read