Air space wars: Three new airlines to fly domestic routes

Indus Air, Bhoja Air and Pearl Air are all set to take off next year.


Saad Hasan December 09, 2011
Air space wars: Three new airlines to fly domestic routes

KARACHI:


The sharp rise in air passengers in recent years has prompted at least three business groups to start their engines and try and capture part of the local aviation industry, officials told The Express Tribune on Friday.


Indus Air, Bhoja Air and Pearl Air are all set to launch flights in 2012 on domestic routes, according to a senior official of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The new entrants will go head-to-head with national carrier Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), Air Blue and Shaheen Air to get a foot-hold in the domestic aviation industry.

Indus Air, a fresh entrant, was recently awarded a licence to fly while Bhoja Air is re-launching its operations after a gap of 12 years.

Meanwhile, Pearl Air was among the airlines, which were issued licences in the 1990s when Pakistan adopted the open-sky policy. Pearl Air’s sponsors have finally begun efforts to start their aircraft business.

“We need at least two more carriers,” said a senior CAA official. “Passengers are being subject to longer and longer wait times at airports and flight cancellation has become a norm. Existing airlines operating with a limited number of aircraft are having a hard time dealing with passenger flow.”

Despite an increase in fares, the number of air travellers within the country jumped to 3.6 million in fiscal 2011 compared with 3.5 million in fiscal 2010.

“The dilapidated state of Pakistan railways has forced passengers opt for the aerial route and has added to the pressure on airlines,” official said.

The three airlines will work under stricter controls considering the setbacks small Pakistani carriers faced in the past and the embarrassment suffered by the regulator CAA.

Except for sponsors of Bhoja Air, the people behind Pearl Air and Indus Air have no previous experience in the aviation industry.

Indus Air has also been a subject of various rumours recently, suggesting that the owners had connections with the government. The fact that it managed to get a licence in a very short time added fuel to these rumours. But a senior CAA official who was close to the process said there was no proof to suggest connections between the sponsors and top government functionaries.

The man behind Karakoram Motors, Abdul Wahab, is the lead investor of Indus Air. “He has been wooed into the business by former PIA officials who are on the board of directors of the carrier,” the CAA official said.  Wahab was not available for comments.

A general manager at Karakoram Motors’ office said nothing has been finalised as yet. The model of aircraft is still being considered, the official added.

However, according to CAA, the airline has contracted four Boeing 737-300 aircraft from a company in Bulgaria. Aircraft inspectors will shortly fly to the country to review the condition of the aircraft, official said.

Bhoja Air’s Chairman Farooq Omar Bhoja said he cannot say when the airline starts flying. “It’s too early to say anything.” Without sharing details, he said that Bhoja was grounded by CAA in October 2000.

After former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif opened country’s airspace in 1993, Bhoja leased B 737-200s. It was grounded after it started losing money and failed to clear CAA dues.

Bhoja Air has appointed Arshad Jalil as its managing director. Jalil was CEO of Shaheen Air for a longtime and owns an aircraft maintenance company.

Pearl Air was among the airlines, which were issued licences in the 1990s but it never actually flew. However, its sponsors have renewed efforts to get aircraft and restart operations.

When Pakistan adopted the open sky policy, more than 20 airline licenses were issued to different business groups, however, none of them except Shaheen survived.

The last airline to declare bankruptcy was Aero Asia. “We have learnt our lessons,” said the CAA official. “None of the new airlines or the ones renewing operations will be allowed to fly on foreign routes for at least a year.”

Published in The Express Tribune, December 10th, 2011.

COMMENTS (24)

Ali | 13 years ago | Reply

Pakistan's domestic traffic is about 7 million passengers per annum and our international traffic is also the same as domestic. India on the other hand has about 110 million domestic passengers and about 40 million international passengers (2010-11). Indian passenger traffic is growing @ 15% per annum whereas Pakistan has being having negative growth in domestic passenger traffic for last 3-4 years. Our international traffic, however, has been growing @ 4% per annum. it is correct that in India all Indian private as well as government owned airlines have suffered heavey losses due to cut throat competition and excessive taxes on fuel. Only one Indian low cost airline GoAir is in profit.

In Pakistan PIA has had loin's share in domestic traffic that is about 73% of the total. Airblue and Shaheen Air put together barely get 27% of the traffic. What appears to be surge in domestic traffic is due to large scale cancellations and excessive delays of PIA flights on domestic as well as international sectors. It hardly reflects any significant growth in domestic passenger traffic.

So what are the prospects of new entrants in airline market? Will market be able to absorb them, if PIA manages to recover from its current wave of gross mismanagement of its scheduled operations? In my opinion market will not be able absorb more than one additional airline of the size of Airblue or Shaheen if PIA manages to survive for a couple of years in the market. Without PIA, of course, three to four airlines of the size of Airblue or Shaheen Air could become viable in the domestic market provided they have sound finacial backing, required skills and experience of running an airline.

Airline business is cash intensive and its inventory is highly perishable. It is one of the riskiest businesses in the world. Its seats come in bulk but its passenges come in ones and twos. To fill the aircraft upto about 80% at the desired price is the real challange. when the aircraft doors close its empty seats perish. An empty seat costs almost as much as a revenue seat. The cost of operating a 125 seater aircraft on Karachi-Islamabad-Karachi sector is about Rs 1.25 million. Imagin if you were to fly a total of 5 flights daily to Lahore(2), Islamabad(2) & Peshawar (1). you could spend Rs 6 million a day without any guarantee that the size of the revenue will be the same or far less than what you expected. Airline business is done by the people with deep pockets and large hearts. you could easily lose a hurndred million just in the very first month of your business. Start up airlines with little or no staying power in the market would be driven out of the market by the competitors within couple of months.

Meekal Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply

@Aamer Khawaja:

No, I do not reside in the 11th century.

All those aspiring entrants MUST be well-palced and well-heeled. Or they would not get a license to operate a private airline. They must have money and connections.

There was an ad in the papers recently where Ms Talpur said she had nothing to do with Indus Air (or Air Indus) and that the allegations were false.

Maybe true, maybe not.

My point was to rubbish the naive idea that she was sitting there, remote control in hand, causing PIA operational problems.

THAT is thinking in the 11th century.

If a reporter sees a PIA plane in the maintenance hangar, they assume it is "grounded". If there is a bird-strike, it's surely the end of PIA when this is a hazard common around the world. With our open garbage dumps in major cities, I am relieved that the problem is not worse than it is in Pakistan.

PIA, despite it's staggering losses, is a valuable asset in terms of fleet and routes.

Personally, I am glad that new airlines are emerging whoever they belong to. I am a great beliver in open competition.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ