Veena Malik files for Rs100m in damages from FHM

Published: December 4, 2011
Malik's lawyers say Veena has faced irreparable harm, loss and damage due to morphed photos. PHOTO: PUBLICITY

Malik's lawyers say Veena has faced irreparable harm, loss and damage due to morphed photos. PHOTO: PUBLICITY

Refusing to balk in the face of controversy, Veena Malik has filed for monetary damages against For Him Magazine (FHM) to the sum of Indian Rs100,000,000 following their release of two magazine covers featuring the diva naked.

The notice was delivered on Sunday and named Maxposure Corporate Media, FHM chieft editor Kabeer Sharma and photographer Vishal Saxena as respondents. It outlined Malik’s narrative of events surrounding the photo shoot for FHM, including the claim that “our client was assured that no nude photograph in any manner would be shot by you.”

The notice reiterated that Malik’s photos had been morphed, stating that Malik had agreed to be shot in shorts and tee shirt and boots; wearing a fur coat up to thighs and boots; hot pants and a broad big belt with the upper portion of her body covered with her hands and an ISI tattoo on her hand; an image with a tattoo of “ISI” appearing on one hand, in which Malik would wear a bikini and/or a thong posing with folded hands with the upper portion of her body covered with other tattoos.

Claiming irreparable harm, loss and damage, the notice said the respondents had committed offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code as well as Information and Technology Act, 2000. The notice called on FHM to ensure the magazine issue would not go into print, remove the tampered photos from the FHM website and pay millions in damages.

Full text of the notice below.


By Hand Delivery/Courier/Fax/Email

4th December, 2011


1.       Maxposure Corporate Media (India) Private Limited,

TV Industrial Estate Basement,

B/22, A.K. Ahire Marg,

Worli, Mumbai 400 018

and its registered office at

Le-Meridien Hotel,

Old Business Centre, 2nd Floor,

Windsor Place, Janpath,

New Delhi 110 001

2.       Mr. Kabeer Sharma,

Chief Editor,

FHM Magazine,

TV Industrial Estate Basement,

B/22, A.K. Ahire Marg,

Worli, Mumbai 400 018

3.       Vishal Saxena,

A Wing, Ground Floor,

Green Park, Leela Apartment,

Yari Road, Andheri (West),


Dear Sirs,

Under instructions from our client Ms. Zahida alias Veena Malik, residing at Kalpak Corner, Station Road, Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050, we have to address to each of you this notice as under:-

1.                 You are aware that our client is a well known model cum film actress, realty TV star and social worker.  Our client is associated with the World Health Organization and is known for her social work and is a well known film personality both in Pakistan, India and all over the world.  Our client hails from Pakistan and has come to India for her professional assignment in the entertainment and fashion industry.

2.                 You are aware that in the first week of November, 2011, you Vishal Saxena approached our client and informed her of a photo shoot only and an interview which would be published in the FHM Magazine to be published in December, 2011.  In the past also, our client had a photo and video shoot with you Vishal Saxena in the month of October 2011 and which was published in the Zoom T.V. As our client had already established a working professional relationship with you Vishal Saxena, she agreed to appear for photo shoot as well as give her interview for the FHM magazine.  Shortly after being contacted by you Vishal Saxena, our client was then contacted by you Kabeer Sharma  chief editor of magazine FHM.  In the course of discussions, an idea was mooted by you Kabeer Sharma that our client should wear a tattoo on her hand with the letters “ISI”. On enquiring, our client was made to understand that it would be good for her image and that of ISI which Institutes / Agencies are available in India and the world including Pakistan  and that there will be no repercussion and/or ill effect if our client wears the said tattoo.  To our client’s knowledge, there are about 56 Institutes with the abbreviation of “ISI” al over the world.

3.                 You Kabeer Sharma also informed our client that after the photo shoot, he would contact our client  for a short interview which he wanted to publish in the forthcoming issue of the magazine FHM.

4.                 You, Vishal Saxena informed our client that there would be 4 photo images used in the said magazine.  The details of the 4 photo images are as follows:-

(a)     An image of our client wearing a shorts and tee shirt and boots;

(b)     An image of our client wearing fur coat upto thighs and boots;

(c)      An image with hot pants and broad big belt and that the upper portion of her body would be covered with her hands and an ISI tattoo on her hand;

(d)     An image with a tattoo of “ISI” appearing on one hand.  Our client would wear a bikini and / or a thong in the image and that she would pose with folded hands and her upper portion of her body would be covered with other tattoos.

Our client was assured that no nude photograph in any manner would be shot by you.

5.                 Our client had categorically informed each of you that by doing photo shoot, she does not want to pose nude in any photographs, which you readily agreed.  You further assured our client that upon taking photographs, you would show the same to our client and that only on our client’s approval, would you publish the said photographs in the said magazine.

6.                 On 23rd November, 2011, a photo shoot was arranged by you Vishal Saxena and the team of Kabeer Sharma at Bungalow No. 96, Aram Nagar, Yari Road, Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai.  The photo shoot went on from the afternoon session till 8.00 p.m.  After the completion of the photo shoot, our client was shown the 4 images with the clothes, as stated in paragraph (4) above.  The photo image where she has posed with her tattoo on her hand was taken with bikini and/ or thong which was worn by our client and also with hot pants and broad belt as stated above.  The size of the photograph was only upto her thighs and our client was shown with folded hands with clothes on, as stated in paragraph 4 above.

7.                 It is a common ground and an admitted position that our client has not for any of the images posed nude and / or nude.  For all the images and photographs which were shot, our client had clothes on, as stated in paragraph 4 above.  Our client, therefore, states that the photographs which are being circulated and published in the FHM magazine December 2011 and Internet site of FHM magazine have been deliberately tampered with and / or morphed with a view to cause wrongful gain to you and cause wrongful loss to our client.  Morphing is a special effect that changes one image to another through a seamless transition.  You have utilized the method and / or tampered with the photographs to cause loss and damage to our client’s reputation.

8.                 After 2 or 3 days, you Kabeer Sharma contacted our client on phone and took her interview.  Our client was informed that the photographs shown to her on 23rd November, 2011 and her interview would be published in the forthcoming issue of FHM magazine in December 2011.

9.                 After our client gave her interview to you Kabeer Sharma, our client was chased by you Vishal Saxena and Kabeer Sharma to give some sort of written confirmation that our client consents to the photo images being published in the forthcoming issue of FHM magazine.  Our client made enquiry with each of you to send the 4 photo images to our client for perusal so that our client can confirm the same.  Each of you informed our client that the photo images our client had seen on the night of 23rd November, 2011, are the very same photo images which are to be published.  Relying solely on your representation and assurance and without verifying the photos once again, our client sent an email on 30th November, 2011 confirming that she was happy with the pictures shot on 23rd November, 2011 and that they could be published.  It is material to note that at that point of time, the photo images were not sent to our client for her perusal and / or verificaiton, but it was only on your verbal assurance & representation that the photo images sent to her were the same photographs which she has seen on 23rd November, 2011, that an email was sent.  Our client reiterates that in photo shots on 23rd November, 2011, there was no nude photographs taken nor was there any of video shots taken of any nude images of our client.  Our client states that if any alleged video is shown or published with her nude pictures or frames, the same is also tampered with by you and /or morphed, for which, our client will take suitable action against each of you.  In fact our client’s contract was only for a photo shoot and not a video shoot.  On the day of the shoot as you started taking video shots, our client reminded you of the arrangement and called upon you to stop the video shoot which you did.  The video was taken only till images (a) and (b) were photographs as set out in paragraph (4) above.

10.            On 2nd December, 2011, our client came to learn that you have posed naked photographs of our client on the internet site of FHM magazine.  You have also circulated and sold the magazine to the public showing the nude photograph. Our client was shocked, astonished and embarrassed to see the said photograph which is published all over the world.  It is pertinent to note that there was no written agreement signed by our client and furnished to you as per the Model Release Form which is a contract with your Company.  Immediately on coming to learn, our client contacted you Vishal Saxena and Kabeer Sharma.  You Vishal Saxena have since then been avoiding our client and our client repeated calls to you have not been replied nor answered.  You Kabeer Sharma has also avoided confrontation with our client and have merely sent an SMS to our client indicating that you propose to have a press conference and sort out the issue with our client.  You have failed to do so.

11.            Our client states that each of you have materially misrepresented to our client and have deceived our client and induced our client to take a photo shoot.  You have further intentionally induced our client to take photographs with clothes on and have subsequently tampered with and / or morphed the photographs with a deliberate intent to cheat our client.  Your act has caused damage and harm to our client’s reputation in the profession in India as well as in her country of birth and the world.  By your said act of publishing the said photo images which shows our client naked, our client states that you have caused irreparable harm, loss, damage to the reputation of our client and committed offence of defaming our client in the public.  Our client states that you have thus committed offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code as well as Information and Technology Act, 2000.

12.            In the circumstances, we are instructed by our client to call upon and require each of you which we hereby do to forthwith (a) cease and desist from continuing with the publication and circulation of our client’s nude photo images in the issue of your magazine FHM December 2011; (b) withdraw the circulation of our client’s nude photograph from your internet site and/or withdraw the circulation of  physical copies of the publication of your forthcoming issue FHM, December, 2011 from the market; and (c) to pay to our client a sum of Rs.10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crores  only) as and by way of monetary damages caused to our client by your illegal act, within a period of 24 hours from the receipt hereof by each of you, failing which, we have peremptory instructions to adopt both civil and criminal proceedings against each of you at your entire risk, as to all costs and consequences, of which please take note of.

13.             Please treat this as “final intimation”.

Yours faithfully,

For M/s. Bilawala & Co.




Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (61)

  • Straight Fire
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:14PM

    Damage has been done now … It’s about time to face the repercussion of ‘Ghairat Brigade’ … only God can forgive you in hearafter and none else


  • HoneyBee
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:19PM

    Morphed Photo . . .Its make me very said . . . .!!!!


  • maria imran
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:22PM

    Poor girl,she’s being harassed and abused by the religious fanatics in pakistan.the holier than thou morality police has been after her head ever since the photos came out.the pathetic hate filled response by our men shows just how threatened and insecure they feel by a woman not afraid of her gender.they then try to take refuge in and hide behind evocative terms like izzat and ghairat etc. It’s high time the men in our society realise that they don’t have to hide their insecurities by abusing and slandering women.what was the thing that offended our brave mard-e-momins the most abou the photos,that one of the pakistani girls was not under their control,that some girl had dared to defy their stranglehold on girls in pakistan.


  • Dec 4, 2011 - 10:22PM

    lol lol


  • Love PAK
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:23PM

    finally she get 100 core rupees without any hardcore work


  • maestro
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:24PM

    Truth comes out. She was at least topless “and/or” wearing a thong or bikini covering her top with her hands. Thats one millimetre away from being plain full nude. And you don’t think the entire FHM team there during the shoot didnt see her in her full glory? Stay in India Veena – uptil now I supported your strong views on being an independent and free woman – this is not the way to do it. Your own father , who obviously raised you wrong, has filed to ban you from working in “entertainment” again. And I would ask Veena how she would feel if she has a daughter one day who goes to this extreme for some publicity and money. Will you be a proud mother then? Its called the oldest profession hon – and you’re in it. We as Pakistanis are ashamed that a woman that we looked up to as a strong voice against extremism went this far. Voice is stronger than physical display. Shame on you. You have just made a million Pak young girls think hmmm this is a good idea. Then don’t blame men for treating you as simply a piece of flesh cause. And on top of that, a week after 24 of Pak army soldiers have been martyred, you make a joke of ISI asking the editors to make the tattoo bigger on your naked top. You have ashamed the Pak armed forces who help us sleep at night in peace with their lives. I don’t want any harm to come to you and hope you realize the mistake you made. but you have disappointed an entire nation. Very sad. Recommend

  • Saj
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:25PM

    Lol, it’s clear in this claim she actually agreed for isi tattoo and posing naked.Recommend

  • Malik
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:33PM

    oh Gosh! what else did u want? u wanted publicity that u got. I think FHM should ask u for payment because now u are popular all around the world. i seen news articles on u in italian german spanish hindi urdu and english news papers. its like dream come true, lol


    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:55PM

    An extremely smart move by Veena Malik which would give her breathing time and a shut up call to the Pakistanis who were after her blood. Such cases take years to be decided unless request is filed for trial in a fast track court. Good luck to her.


  • Raj
    Dec 4, 2011 - 10:57PM

    LOL !!! This Girl really needs to grow up !!! Does she really think that FHM, is habit of printing covergirl pics without prior arrangements???
    I can see, as to reasons for her actions as the local crowd are pretty upset with her and this may calm things down for while, once again these sort of cases can take long time to resolve, so it will all be forgotten at home !!!!


  • Emaar
    Dec 4, 2011 - 11:11PM

    Nude or Fake….it was hot! :D this is just aftermath.


  • Fahad Raza
    Dec 4, 2011 - 11:11PM

    That’s an epic fail on the champions of BeGherat Brigade.


  • akbar junaid
    Dec 4, 2011 - 11:31PM

    Yes I also think the photo was morphed.
    Veena might be bold but not crazy enough to go nude considering it would mean certain death from a self-righteous muslim at home.


  • RVC
    Dec 4, 2011 - 11:53PM

    Veena Come on you have already benefited from this episode and you knew fully well what you were upto. Now, by doing this stunt of filing INR 100 million in damages, is taking this thing very far. FHM chaps knew you would backtrack so they filmed/videographed the entire proceedings. You may fool the Pakistani public by doing this but not Indian media.
    If you stripped then be a woman and own up that you did so and take a stand. Why hiding behind this stunt of a fake legal notice.
    I rest my case.
    By the way how many people will buy FHM, I really wonder these type of cover are a regular in Indian Media. Period.


  • pakifan
    Dec 4, 2011 - 11:56PM

    Smart move to earn easy money and to earn easy publicity. Who cares about the nation when you have one crore in your bank for six hours of work!!!!!! Lol, you are learning tricks from kim Kardeshian!!!!!


  • zalim
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:07AM

    pakistani men just want to keep thier women under the burka so they can stand if someone choose not to! its hurts thier ego!!..and becasue shes no maduri dixit shes a easy target.!!!…so many bollywood actress and muslim and have changed thier name so they have this shame finger pointed at thme yet noone knows! pakistani men just need to concentrate their own polictical issues and leave the women alone!!


  • Usman Zafar
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:20AM

    Veena Malik has revealed her true asstes now its turn of politicians to follow.


  • minhas
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:34AM

    exactly pakifan.. all she needs to do is marry some rich indian get a million dollar enagagement ring break it off.. and move on to some other controversy!…


  • rehmat
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:39AM

    @pakifan: “”

    She is not going to get “easy money”. The editorial team claims that they have a video shooting of the entire photo shoot. Also that there were 8 other people present at the shoot. So thi sis not a case of ‘he says’, she says’ with no witnesses.

    The only purpose of filing this is to prove to the Pakistani public that she was wronged. These cases take years and Veena is confident that by the time there is a judgement against her no one will remember.


  • Ch. Allah Daad
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:45AM

    Its not a nude photo. Perhaps I don’t have X-rays fitted in my eyes. She is covering her upper portion with her hands. Is it must that women should cover her body with clothes only. Why cann’t other things be used. She won’t be able to prove it a nude photo. Therefore any monetary gain is out of question. One more question arises. Exposing upper portion of male or female body should be considered nudity or not? If yes, then Salman Khan is in big trouble.


  • bobo
    Dec 5, 2011 - 1:45AM

    miss veena must be told that the picture about which she is crying so much had probably just a thin line of the thong string moving across the side along her waist. The editor/photographer removed it … No big deal but its amazing that she agreed to wearing that stuff.Recommend

  • AK Murthy
    Dec 5, 2011 - 1:54AM

    Ok. So ISI will get to share with the $100M. Well done Veena


  • ecstasy
    Dec 5, 2011 - 1:56AM

    @maria imran:
    wth r u talking…u dont even sense!!..!!….first she not too high reputed…haven’t u heard “bad reputed is worst than the bad person itself”…go n watch BIG BOSS or VEENA ASIF interviews first …if she is proven guilty she should be charged if not then FHM Should be charged …2ndly ur (that one of the pakistani girls was not under their control) doesnt make sense at all cost …..n i bet if mahira khan (hamsafar drama) would be in this state…all the pk ppl including police,religious,teenagers etc would be supporting her cox of her repute!!…


  • Ali
    Dec 5, 2011 - 1:57AM

    Well I would say that she did a good job by being naked. Its normal for models in India to give such poses. As far as this picture being fake is concerned I wont say that this picture is fake if it was fake then why would she need to cover her breasts with her hands,


  • ecstasy
    Dec 5, 2011 - 2:03AM

    @Ch. Allah Daad:
    exposing upper portion of male body is not considered nude …2ndly its not the nude pic the real nude pic which appeared on mag front page is not here.(google it)…3rd women can use anythng which covers her body but don’t use as seduction…any cloth or other piece which reveals her body is unacceptable


  • Mustafa
    Dec 5, 2011 - 2:19AM

    @maria imran:

    I think we all need to agree on one thing. Nudity is not only not allowed in Religion … but also is ethically/ Morally and by any other standards wrong. (and hiding ur breasts with your hands while u wear nothing but a thong is also considered as nudity).

    And if you think otherwise then would u mind liberating your gender as well? How about you act more and talk less … lets see how a firm believer are u on your own words. If u think going naked would in any way represent freedom or empowerment … then u should also do a naked photo shoot and publish photos and send every one links to those photos of yours.


  • Nauman
    Dec 5, 2011 - 2:36AM

    Rehman malik comes in support for veena malik and said that the picture looks fake. He said, The use of technology cant b ignored as i was also shown sitting on a donkey in one pic. Lol


  • Taha
    Dec 5, 2011 - 3:14AM

    Indeed a shameful act if and only if, it is true. Bearing the point that our religious scholars are detesting such an unfamy, i would like to support them on this issue. I am not a perfectionist when it comes to fulfilling my religious obligations but atleast i try to stay basic and so should every MARD-E-MOMIN and MUSLIM WOMEN. It has dented the “in so far deteriorating” image of My nation and I condemn it with my heart and soul


  • hashmatkhan
    Dec 5, 2011 - 3:22AM

    cant believe that a girl could be so beautifu, forget it wthr she was wearing a bikini or not see how beautiful she is. could not sleep for three nights so far.


  • goggi
    Dec 5, 2011 - 3:29AM

    She has distinctly overstepped the mark and it shall certainly have adverse consequences for her, in case she dare to return to Pakistan.


  • Maria
    Dec 5, 2011 - 4:20AM

    Let this sad excuse for a woman make her own future in India. Now she wants to sue the Indians? Who cares. Pakistanis are wasting far too much time on an anti state clown who is only too happy to degrade her own homeland with the Indians. These same Indians who are actively involved in sending agents and criminals across the border to hurt Pakistanis. Maybe Ms. Malik can now travel to Israel and do a pictorial there too against Islamic states. She wanted her 5 minutes of fame- she got it and now it’s over. Please don’t waste any more media time on this confused woman.


  • jane
    Dec 5, 2011 - 4:26AM

    clever girl – get into grey area then sue the magazine for billions – what a great way to make easy money !!!!!!!!!


  • Kashif Iqbal
    Dec 5, 2011 - 5:40AM

    What damages? She got free publicity ;)


  • Dec 5, 2011 - 8:02AM

    She is within her rights to claim damage if she is telling the truth. The Courts in India will give her justice if true.

    I think she is in mortal danger in Pakistan, so she should be careful. She can stay in India, where there will be no threat to her life and living, but only till her visa runs out. She should opt to stay in some other Country in exile.


  • jagjit sidhoo
    Dec 5, 2011 - 9:39AM

    @Ali:” if it was fake then why would she need to cover her breasts with her hands,” No one seems to have considered this point u should be a lawyer or in some int agency. Veena and FHM have got what they wanted free publicity not to many people new of them before this happened . Regarding the court case she will be a grandmother by the time it is settled.


  • AD
    Dec 5, 2011 - 9:52AM

    HAHAHAHA.. She is really stupid and wants only money & fame.


  • Kazmis
    Dec 5, 2011 - 9:56AM

    @Ch. Allah Daad:
    You people are very correct. The declaration to the court appeal shows that she agreed for photograph and Tattoo of ISI. Now she calling court with the combined planning with FHM, using old tactics which is common in Indian Film Industry that settlement is done out of the court by the two parties, getting free publicity and clearance from the public, like Dabang dance with publicity of a Balm.. Ms. Mallick no doubt humiliated Pakistan and its Institution for cheap publicity and dirty money. Shame Shame.


  • Ata ur Rehman
    Dec 5, 2011 - 12:30PM

    Why are we all wasting our energies on this issue?. We all have better things to do than giving our times to someone who is not amongst us. She may claim herself to be a Pakistani, but, actually its the other way round. As the old saying goes “Don’t spoil your own clothes by throwing stones in dirty waters”. Let her face the tune the way she wants it. We all need to understand not to have any claims on her.


  • Yuri Kondratyuk
    Dec 5, 2011 - 1:46PM

    Similar story happened when an Indian actress Kajal Agarwal posed for FHM and then went ahead accusing the magazine of tarnishing her reputation and so forth. FHM replied that it had the video of the entire shoot and was prepared to present it as a proof in the court of law along with a copy of legal agreement.

    As one can guess, the said actress suddenly realized the merits of silence.


  • Dec 5, 2011 - 2:25PM

    (d) An image with a tattoo of “ISI” appearing on one hand. Our client would wear a bikini and / or a thong in the image and that she would pose with folded hands and her upper portion of her body would be covered with other tattoos.

    Just asking this out of curiosity: A picture wearing a thong with the upper body covered with one’s hand and tattoos is considered ‘clothed’ and not nude???


  • Hassan bhutta
    Dec 5, 2011 - 2:32PM

    She is doing all these thing 4 the sake of publicity. I think she should be kicked out from pakistan.Recommend

  • Raj
    Dec 5, 2011 - 2:53PM

    @Sana Iqbal:
    She is just sending out message that she would like to be a Bond Girl too !!!
    But sadly, she is not in that league !!!!


  • saba younis
    Dec 5, 2011 - 3:09PM

    its a shameful act


  • Judas Priest
    Dec 5, 2011 - 3:53PM

    @Maria Imran, I totally disagree with you. Posing like that is against our religion, culture, morality and everything. If you live in Pakistan, live like Pakistanis.


  • narayana murthy
    Dec 5, 2011 - 4:37PM

    I don’t understand one thing though…why is importing such trash from other countries.

    Katrina kaif, for example, is not an actress, even if you twist the definition of acting to suit Mahesh Bhatt’s IQ. However, she’s an actress in India.

    Veena Malik, doesn’t even look as good as Katrina Khaif.

    Just a handful of us cannot bring a lot of changes.Recommend

  • Altaf Hussain, Mumbai
    Dec 5, 2011 - 4:42PM

    Can you think of a girlie magazine publish a nude picture without having their flanks covered? Nudity in the print or electronic media might be banned in Pakistan, but it is commonplace in India. There are dozens of magazines dishing out nude pictures day-in day-out. As a matter of media policy in India, all modelling shoots are video recorded so as to avoid controversies at a later stage. And I am talking of normal modelling shoots. It is unthinkable in India to shoot for a girlie magazine without proper documentation and video cover. You guys need to grow up!Recommend

  • BGS
    Dec 5, 2011 - 5:11PM

    What is shocking here is Veena’s blatant denial of this shoot. FHM did not all of a sudden morph her photo & print it. Magazines/Newspapers also have some kind of responsibilities and values. If her photos were morphed then why isn’t she coming out and saying it in public ?? Why is the silence from Veena ?? It looks like a perfect story hatched between Veena & FHM. But frankly speaking Veena is losing credibility everyday because of her silence. She will off from India very soon.


  • MD
    Dec 5, 2011 - 5:18PM

    When a Pakistani citizen commits an act of terrorism anywhere in the world, you guys shout out aloud that an entire country could not be blamed for an act of an individual and you dub him as a “non state actor”. But, when another individual (read Veena Malik) does something, which is a totally harmless act, you the same people, start calling it an outrageous act and a national shame. Which makes Veena Malik is a “state actor”!
    Phew!! What a double standards!!


  • Dec 5, 2011 - 6:29PM

    This is all fault of media. Why they are adding news like this in their programs.They just don’t need to pay attention to any publicity stunt ,Veena Malik is doing .

    that’s all


  • uwall
    Dec 5, 2011 - 6:55PM

    she also mentioned , there r 56 institute taged with isi in the world, not that witch we thinking!


  • uwall
    Dec 5, 2011 - 6:57PM



  • zalim singh
    Dec 5, 2011 - 9:19PM

    eating cake and having it too, veena?


  • Asif Mahmood
    Dec 5, 2011 - 9:40PM

    Only ISI can tell whether picture is fake or not.


  • Dec 6, 2011 - 5:13AM

    Veena Malik should fight it if she is honest. No one has a right to judge her before anything’s proven.


  • Hasan
    Dec 6, 2011 - 6:22AM

    No doubt FHM will be happy to reach an out of court settlement. The magazine has already made a fortune on sales revenue with this WELL published current edition of the magazine.


  • jagjit sidhoo
    Dec 6, 2011 - 9:05AM

    @Hasan: There wont be any out of court settlement the case will linger and die its own death. Veena and FHM got what they wanted free publicity how many people knew about them before this?


  • Ihk
    Dec 6, 2011 - 10:00AM

    Her name is Zahida!! :D


  • Judas Priest
    Dec 6, 2011 - 3:54PM

    If we condone her act, other Pakistani girls would be encouraged to do the same. Instead of working hard and getting a good education, they would think this is the easier path to make money and soon we will have rampant nudity and prostitution in Pakistan. And by the way, she is not even pretty but just an average looking Pakistani woman. Neither she is pretty, nor have a great figure.


  • Yasir Hayat
    Dec 7, 2011 - 1:26PM

    Who says its a question of nudity , national honor blah blah. Its a text book formula for making money by Media via internet blogs, newspapers etc. A well thought out and win win situation for both media and Ms Malik!
    Media thrives on ppl ‘s emotionality special national honor, juicy gossips and time wasting internet bloggers . I must say who ever have designed this drama know the mentality of subcontinent ppl very well. Hats of to him!
    Also has anybody wonderedMillion Dollar question is can how much fortune ppl have made with this stunt? :)


  • Fy
    Dec 7, 2011 - 10:50PM

    Well …. Meera has given a bad impression and left a black mark on Pakistan’s Face”
    She should be punished for all shes been doing and did in past,Or else she can change her identity and being an indian continue to do all they do…..and it even doesn’t offends their society..
    @maria imran:Recommend

  • Manish Sharma
    Dec 12, 2011 - 10:30AM

    I do not fully understand why we think Veena Malik, a Pakistan citizen, is the ambassador of Pakistan while she is in India. This has brought ‘sharam’ to her, though she does not feel it, but how has it brought ‘sharam’ to Pakistan?

    It has certainly brought ‘sharam’ to India, by telling the whole world how vulgar we have become in recent years. In 1970s, this would have been unthinkable. And even today, many, many Indians feel magazines such as FHM go against our region’s tradition of personal modesty.


More in Gossip