Analysis: Plenty of room for interest rate reduction

Why negative real borrowing costs may be good for spurring economic growth.


Umer Pervez/zafar Masud November 28, 2011
Analysis: Plenty of room for interest rate reduction

KARACHI:


With interest rates having gone down by 2% since July, the State Bank of Pakistan’s current strategy seems to be geared towards kick-starting the economy by encouraging private sector borrowing. An interesting question to ask then is: what should be the interest rate structure required to stimulate growth and also to attract investment.


Peer Group Analysis

It can be demonstrated that benchmark interest rates in Pakistan should be further lowered by 150 basis points (1.5%) below the average inflation rate to remain at par with its peer group, most of which seem to have negative real interest rates.

In Pakistan, the State Bank has lowered its benchmark discount rate by 2% since July, primarily on the back of declining inflation and reduced government borrowing from the central bank. Given that inflation is currently still 80 basis points below the benchmark interest rate, the SBP still has room to reduce rates by another 50 to 75 basis points at its next monetary policy announcement on November 30.

Benefits of lower interest rates

With fiscal deficit expected to overshoot the budgeted target of 4% of GDP, the government is financing the gap through higher domestic borrowing amid stressed external sources. At present, outstanding government domestic floating debt has reached Rs3.5 trillion (up 28% from last year) with the banks’ share of credit extended to the government increasing by 18% to 66% at the end of September.

If not abated, excessive money printing (inflationary in nature) to plug fiscal slippages can invariably cause a market imbalance going forward. In these exceptional times, an interest rate cut should draw out a win-win situation for both private industry and the government. Industry will benefit through lower borrowing costs, while the government will benefit from lower domestic debt servicing. The government can lower its borrowing cost by Rs17 billion on every 0.5% reduction in the discount rate.

In fact, one can argue that higher interest rates in Pakistan are fuelling inflation, as the current higher interest rates are enhancing the funding requirements for the government which not only have compounding impact (higher interest bill results in higher borrowings) but also have a higher multiplier effect on the money movement.

Impact on capital markets and the banks

Capital investments should also have a positive impact from interest rate rationalisation and will consequently assist in improving the country’s capital markets. Revenue generation of the government would gain traction and consequently lead to lower borrowing requirements of the government and also ultimately result in the reversal of the private sector crowding out phenomenon.

A lower interest rate environment should also increase liquidity of banks as the multiplier effect of reversal of private sector crowing out starts to take place. Non-performing loans (NPL) of the banking sector would also come down from the current relatively high NPL ratio of 14.4%. The banking sector would be favourably inclined towards lending to the private sector in a lower interest rate environment.

This has happened in Pakistan before. Between 2002 and 2006, when interest rates were lowered to single digits, the government started repayments on its domestic debt. The banking sector, given the excess liquidity, had little choice but to extend credit to the consumer segment. As a result, this triggered an economic boom where GDP growth averaged 7% between 2003 and 2007.

That said, we should not rule out capital gains on short term papers in a lower interest rate environment as investments are heavily loaded in favour of government securities. On fundamentals, the KSE-100 Index trades at an attractive forward price-to-earnings ratio of 5.88 (discount of 48% against the region) and offers an inflation adjusted return on equity of 13.2% (premium of 25% against the region).

Conclusion

In conclusion, it may be safely inferred that an interest rate reduction over a period of time is not only inevitable but also compulsory to rejuvenate the lacklustre economy. Based on the analysis above, in the immediate future, the discount rate could be cut by up to 0.75%. However, the ultimate aim should be to achieve an interest rates reduction of around 1.5% below inflation, in line with other economies in Pakistan’s peer group.

Zafar Masud is the chairman of Burj Capital and Umer Pervez is head of research at the firm

Published in The Express Tribune, November 28th, 2011.

COMMENTS (2)

Obaid | 12 years ago | Reply

@ Econ 101 Student. If I may elaborate the rationale of a negative real interest rate. Conventional logic and debt deflation theory might suggest that lender would incur loses should inflation rate exceeds expectations as real interest rate becomes negative. Banks are concerned with their net interest margins and loan performance so negative real rates would not be of much consequence as long they can draw compensation from paying lower rates on deposits.

IMO you are spot regarding govt benefiting the most from in interest rate reduction. I think it would be unwise to lower interest rate without investigating the historical relationship interest sensitive spending and interest rate changes.

However I may disagree with the negative relationship between the inflation and domestic investment you have proposed. Infact inflation is necessary for capital expenditure. ITS THE INFLATION VARIABILITY THAT DISCOURAGES INVESTMENT. Please feel free to correct should you feel I've made incorrect statements. It may help my understanding :)

Econ 101 Student | 12 years ago | Reply Makes no sense... 1.5% below inflation??? An interest rate below inflation essentially means banks will be paying borrowers to borrow rather than the other way round. The other countries in the alleged "peer group" are possibly being referred to some country affected by the global credit crisis. These countries don't have a high inflation problem. Rather they are worried about deflation and are dropping interest rates as last ditch effort for a fiscal stimulus. These countries are interested in inflating their way out of debt and have comparative advantage in certain solid exports. Pakistan has neithern and inflation here is already high. If one drops interest rates so fast as the writers are proposing it could result in loss of confidence in the rupee and much increased inflation. The writers must understand that the biggest borrower will benefit most from this drop in interest rates. This will be the government first and not the private sector. The government needs to first curtail suprrfluous spending and trying to inflate their way through this otherwise an interest rate cut won't even achieve a boost in private sector investment as the writers are proposing. Private companies do not invest in expansion when they think there is a chance of high inflation and therefore certain increase in interest rates going forward (which is a certainty as high inflation sets in). I'm surprised such senior individuals in our banking sector can't understand this.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ