Army denies reports of talks with Taliban

ISPR spokesperson says negotiations with terrorist outfits are undertaken by government, not military.

Afp/express November 22, 2011

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan army on Tuesday denied news reports that alleged that it was engaged in negotiations with the banned militant outfit Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

A statement issued by the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) “strongly and categorically” refuted news reports published by foreign news agencies on Monday that claimed that the Pakistani government and military were engaging in peace talks that could end a wave of bombings that has killed thousands of people.

“The army is not undertaking any kind of negotiations with TTP or its affiliated militant groups,” the spokeperson said.

“Such reports are concocted, baseless and unfounded,” he added.

He also added that any negotiations or reconciliation process with militant groups is undertaken by the government and not the military.

A senior TTP militant commander had said on Monday that the banned group was engaging in initial peace talks with the Pakistan government and military.

"Peace talks are continuing with the Pakistani government and army. We have had two rounds of such talks," one senior Taliban commander told AFP by telephone, claiming to be on a 10-member negotiating committee.

He said Taliban conditions included troops withdrawing to barracks, the military compensating losses and an exchange of prisoners. The Taliban commander also told AFP that the talks concern South Waziristan and if successful, they will expand to other tribal districts.

He said that former military officials from the tribal areas were acting as mediators in the talks.

Two mid-level intelligence officials in the northwest were ignorant of any peace talks, but said they could be taking place at a "very high level".

Reports of the peace talks come as the United States seeks Pakistani help in facilitating a peace process in neighbouring Afghanistan, where the Taliban have been leading an increasingly deadly 10-year insurgency.

A second Pakistani Taliban commander confirmed initial contacts with the government, saying that Taliban across the tribal belt had given their consent.

"Peace negotiations have been going on several weeks. Our first condition was to stop military offensives in the tribal areas," the commander said.

But the main spokesman for Pakistan's umbrella Taliban faction, Tehreek-e-Taliban, denied any peace talks.

"At the moment, the chapter of peace talks with the government is completely closed," Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan told AFP by telephone from an undisclosed location.

A regular visitor to North Waziristan, a premier Taliban hub, said the militia always denies negotiations with the authorities but that "these days, they are re-evaluating their strategy, and considering to halt attacks".

Pakistani troops have been fighting against homegrown Taliban in much of the semi-autonomous tribal belt which snakes along the northwest border with Afghanistan.


Hasan Mehmood | 9 years ago | Reply


I only responded to your claim that we maybe killing militants extra judiciously. I just mentioned that we may have killed suspected rapists, killers, kidnappers etc in fake encounters but never any high profile militant target. The most obvious target could have been Malik Ishaq (the self confessed killer) who had all witnesses murdered. (Maybe he did not eliminate any witness but it was voluntarily done by sympathizers like you). Anyway we gave him full benefit of doubt as per law. Sufi Mohammad openly challenged our legal system and mind you he is a much softer face of militants.

Anyway instead of going on a tangent please reply to the core issue as mentioned in my earlier post dated November 22.

Ghaznavi | 9 years ago | Reply

@ Hasan Mahmood

Who is going to decide who is a rapist and who is a murderer? The bullet, the bomb or your favorite drones?? Can you name any country where 'suspected' rapists and murderers are killed before being found guilty? And here bombs kill not only suspected criminals but also his family and his neighbors or entire mohalla.

You mean to say, if i suspect you of any wrongdoing, its okay for me to blow your house, kill you family and your neighbours too?? Once found guilty, we can execute them but not before!!

For your information, your 'advanced democratic country, the US is not holding any american in Guantanamo. and why couldnt they find any jail within US?? Because this is against all human rights, geneva convention. It is even against their constitution. And out of more than 180m ppl held at Guantanmo, only 4 have been tried. And most are held innocent for years - those who ere unlucky at the wrong place at the wrong time. It could have been you or me. Consider!! Stand up for what is right!

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ