These are considered Third World VIPs who do not count with the State Department, much less with the security apparatus directly under the US president. This arrogance is reflected all the way, beginning from security, immigration to the customs personnel.
Muslims from all over the world face the worst of treatments in America. Each one of them is a potential terrorist in the eyes of security officials. It seems that the primary reason for insulting Abdul Kalam is that he is a Muslim — and what he went through Shah Rukh Khan also had to face a couple of years ago. He had to take off his jacket and shoes even when he was India’s president. Now he is a former president and, therefore, had to be frisked twice, once at the airport and the second time when he had boarded the plane.
While Muslims bear the brunt, others from our part of the world are also treated brusquely. Even Hardeep Singh Puri, our ambassador to the UN, had to go through the body search and what not.
The treatment meted out to our former ambassador to America was no better. My hunch is that Washington resorts to such methods when it finds that New Delhi is not accepting some of its economic or business proposals.
I, too, had a taste of America’s security last year. I carried a diplomatic passport and my credentials said that I was a journalist. After the security personnel were through with the body search, I asked them what was wrong with my papers. One of them said: your passport has too many stamps of visits to Pakistan and Bangladesh and both are Muslim countries. I could not allay their fear on this point. I kept quiet.
Yet this only confirmed my suspicion that the Americans treat people from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh as fodder. We are too poor and too divided. That is our problem and we need to solve it. But this does not give America any right to treat nationals from underdeveloped countries as it does. I am surprised that even academics at the best of universities have not whispered a word against this.
An apology to Kalam would have meant something if it had come from President Barack Obama or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. All he has received is a written apology from a junior US official. This is like rubbing salt into ones wounds. Philosophically, Kalam has said that it does not matter what happened to him.
Yet India has to ensure that such insults are not perpetrated again. But for that the American administration will have to agree to some norms and regulations. At present, everything is dependent on the whims of the security personnel at airports. Since the entire set-up is under President Obama, nobody from the US State Department or any other wing of government can challenge what it does.
In the meantime, New Delhi should withdraw the concessions extended to American VIPs and the US envoy at Delhi. This will jolt Washington. CPI-M leader Prakash Karat has rightly proposed a tit-for-tat response. But New Delhi does not have the gumption to accept such a suggestion. This is clear from the reaction of Foreign Minister Krishna who is satisfied with the routine apology offered.
The Patriot Act which was passed in America after 9/11 needs a second look. The Act gives sweeping powers for search and surveillance, and eliminates checks and balances that previously gave the US courts the opportunity to ensure that the right of personal liberty enshrined in the constitution is not abused. That no untoward incident has happened after 9/11 is a credit to the American security apparatus. But no democracy remains one if the clauses of the Patriot Act continue to operate. Strange, there is very little protest from the American people.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 22nd, 2011.
COMMENTS (54)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Islam forbidden slavery fifteen hundreds years ago why arab opologized for????
@Vijay K Makes your countries like them so we dont have to come to west.
@You said it not Man pakistan did apologized to Bangladesh if u remeber in Mushraf time and also give them free Al kHALID tanks...
@Brandt Hardin: Not sure what this has to do with the article. However, I have no problem if I am racially profiled in USA before getting on a flight : It makes my flight safer. The likes of Shahzad have brought us all a bad name and we will suffer for what Pakistan exports.
@You Said It: @Falcon: You might have understood why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a result of an act of compassion if moderators would have let my post through. Your loss, I presume! Talking about apologies, when is Pakistan going to tender an apology to Bangla Desh, now that Bangla Desh has demanded it officially?
@Falcon I don't agree with G.Din's assertion that the bombing of Japan was an act of compassion.
But on your note on apologies, why pick on the US. Turkey hasn't apologized to Armenia. China hasn't apologized to Tibet. UK didn't apologize to us. Belgium didn't apologize to Congo, etc, etc.
For the record, Japan did apologize to Korea, but Koreans think that's not enough. Germany apologized to Jews and gypsies. Also, the US did apologize to Africans for slavery, though Arabs have refused to do so. US has also apologized to Native Americans, as Australians have to aborigines. There is also a major push in the US to apologize to Japan, and I believe that this will happen in the next decade -- it takes time to build consensus for this.
Speaking of the high road, Pakistan can take it too and set an example to the rest of the world: apologize to Bangladesh.
@Abdul Rehman Gillani sahab U right brother god bless u.
@KSS: I think you mean that Kuldip is a "former" Indian High Commissioner to the UK, not "formal". He was the HC in 1990 (21 years ago). (Rajesh Prasad is India's current High Commissioner in London.) You can't expect the US to accord special treatment to "former" diplomats of other countries. There are millions of such people around the world, not to mention their family members who often get issued diplomatic passports too.
Regardless, the articles of the Indian Passport Act, 1967 call out that diplomatic passports are for serving diplomats traveling in official capacity. In addition, the Vienna Convention also states that diplomats have to be recognized by the receiving country with a diplomatic visa or other formal acknowledgment. Holders of diplomatic passports are not entitled to diplomatic protocol. Pompous ex-diplomats in particular should be disabused of such notions.
Marijuana is the safest drug with actual benefits for the user as opposed to alcohol which is dangerous, causes addiction, birth defects, and affects literally every organ in the body. Groups are organizing all over the country to speak their minds on reforming pot laws. I drew up a very cool poster featuring Uncle Willie Nelson and The Teapot Party for the cause which you can check out on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/01/vote-teapot-2011.html Drop in and let me know what you think!
@Falcon
Thanks for a perceptive post.
@Ali Tanoli:
Fate had it, and the schemes he planned to destroy Pakistan from the start, well, lets say that IRA had the last word. What goes around, comes back around.
@G. Din: For the love of lord...how was it an act of compassion? Secondly, the very fact that Japanese didn't apologize...should that mean that US shouldn't apologize as well?...and lastly...whatever mess nation states create due to fights between themselves...innocent human beings should not have to pay for it...yes Muslim militants are crazy and honestly have given us Muslims the worst image possible...but US is a great nation and can choose to take the high road...when you start compromising on your values because of fear...it is a slippery slope with no end to it!
@G Din Can we forgive Visroy Moutbatton for Bloodshed in India partition can we i dont think so??
@G Din Wonderfully put it man god bless your knowledge and u.
For seconds i think very diff and very rational as a Hindi Muslim that if we all forget our past diffrences and problems and wars and reliegens just get united to fight all sane things in contienent like for example lets fight against poverty against casts against all the evils lets eat together lets build temples and masjids side by side can we guys who will with me.
@KSS: "former"
'Muslims and the US'?? Was not aware George Fernandes is a Muslim.
Is Mr. Nayar aware of the stapled visas being issued by China to the residents of Arunachal Prdesh? Would Mr. Nayar and comrade Karat sugest a tit for tat gesture to China that may include Tibet or Taiwan?
@Spud: It would be "former president".
sir,quoting examples of kalam n shahrukh khan will never make indian muslims alarmed coz these ppl r not considered to be "muslims".America has a security apparatus and every foreigner has to go through.we muslims have earned suspicion by using islamic names n practices for abetting terrorism,ofcourse islam prohibits terrorism.
Don't know what the fuss is about. The so-called VIPs are no better than you and me. Why should they get preferential treatment? If we can get frisked, they should be too.
@Ruman: "Adolf Hitler, name sounds familiar doesn’t it, not an american but definitely a christian, responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Would you blame Christianity, at large, for his actions." No, no one can blame Christianity for Adolf Hitler's crimes precisely because he did not commit those crimes in the name of Christianity and Jesus Christ; Muslims from all over the world commit their unspeakable crimes in the name of Islam and Mohammed even if we disregard the fact that the WWII was fought between Christians. "Did Japan ever get an apology for such an act of barbarism, I think not." No, they did not, precisely because it was not an act of barbarism but of compassion. Perhaps that shocks you and makes your jaw drop in disbelief. If that has this effect, you will do well to study the history of the times closely to find what options were available to President Truman. As far as you quoting William Leahy U.S. Chief of Staff 1942-1949 is concerned, he did not have the onus of making that fateful decision. So, it is easy for him to propound after the fact. Could it be because of a hurt ego that his opinion (if he did speak against his C-in-C's decision) was disregarded? If he was so goddamn outraged, did he resign his job? Of course, not! Talking about apologies. has Japan tendered an apology to Chinese and Koreans for their war time crimes against their civil populations. Those attrocities were so horrific that Lord Mountbatten in his will had expressly forbidden the presence of any Japanese at his funeral!
@Atif Ejaz: Atif Mian, just because one does not toe the line of popular sentiment does not make them hateful of Muslims and Pakistan. You see, in India, we are allowed to have an opinion other than what is being propagated. I am an Indian and have a lot of respect for all my Muslim friends, who I consider very close and friends for life.
Please refrain from making blanket statements!
the relationship between india and the usa ( and indeed with russia ) is doing just fine ... not necessary for a presumptious third party to interfere .....thanks anyway
@Kuldip Nayar
Always better to be safe than sorry
If American's have to go through security -- why should the author get a pass? Security screening is done for the safety of the public and your ego should not get in the way. As far as security paying attention to people who visit Pakistan -- well that makes sense since Pakistan has the reputation as the nexus of terrorism and that isn't the American's fault. As others have stated -- if you are offended by security screening then don't travel to America I am sure you won't be missed.
Atif Ejaz : Indians were not indoctrinated by textbooks and so on to hate muslims or pakistanis. I am sure Indians do not have any hate for non-pakistani muslims and we do have brotherly relations with many other muslim countries other than Pakistan. But I cannot say the same thing about Indians hating Pakistani muslims. I guess Pakistanis earned that. To cap that, this hatred is shared by many other countries as well.
the above comments by indians show the intensity of hate they have for muslims and pakistan, and i am not surprised
@Santosh:
While I agree with your comments. There is one factual error: Kuldip Nayar is a formal Indian High Commissioner to UK therfore he is a diplomat albeit a "formal".
What is this? If you have made most trips to Pakistan, they will scrutinise you closely. This is understandable given the current situation. What this as links to treating SouthAsians as fodder. Everybody knows this is region serves as cannon for terrorists. Their concern is very well rooted on past incidents.
@HHH: prevention and paranoia are different. paranoia is based on bias and unfounded fear...and sometumes on people' own misdeeds.
I think it has more to do with economic might. If it was just the religion George Fernandes would not have been strip searched when he was the defence minister of India
Dr.Abul Kalam is no ordinary Muslim. He is a Past President of India which is major economic power. What we have to remember here is that average American person is incredibly stupid and ignorant. US schoolchildren are unable to show locations of different countries correctly. How could they know what a Past President is?
Our tribal Pathan elders refused pat down few years ago when they were invited on an official visit. I believe they came back prematurely without talk.
Why Americans? Even Arabs. In Saudi Bangladeshis are treated like scum. On a highway check Pakistanis are striped naked. Only Indian non Muslims are not checked. Just with the past experience the security has to be extra careful.
Kuldip Nayar: The problem is that people in the sub-continent routinely abuse the system.
There is an obvious discrepancy in your case -- e.g., you are not a diplomat but were carrying a diplomatic passport. While this is all "chalta hai" in the sub-continent, it obviously looks bogus to a US immigration official when a journalist shows up carrying a diplomatic passport. I know too many middling bureaucrats, ex-MPs, even ex-MLAs and sr police officers who have diplomatic passports, though they have nothing to do with the Indian Foreign Service or have long since left office.
I have a number of visits to muslim/Arab countries stamped on my regular Indian passport, and have gone through US immigration without once being detained/body-searched, etc. The difference is that I'm just a regular citizen with genuine business reasons for visiting these nations.
It is fashionable to denounce the US, but I find the US immigration officials to be refreshingly egalitarian, professional and curt. I actually love the fact that they don't give a hoot about who you are, how rich you are or how famous you claim to be. This is marked contrast to India, where industrialists and anyone who knows anyone routinely bypass immigration upon arrival.
The insult to India is not from the US, but from the so-called "privileged" Indians who abuse the system wheeling/dealing for some "privilege" or the other. Former President Kalam unfortunately had to bear the brunt because while he has earned and is entitled to the privilege, too many Indians show up at the US doors claiming the same privilege though they aren't entitled to it.
The last time I checked, US admin sacked two officials who were responsible for Kalam's frisking. The author is advised to check his facts before spreading silly canards. Considering the awful number of VIPs in our part of the world, where every Charlie and his aunt is a VIP, the Americans can hardly be faulted on this score. Actually, as an Indian citizen, I find it immensely satisfying that at least there is one place in the world where our spoiled VIPs are treated as humble plebeians. Keep it up US!
Sir, Why are you so concerned about Muslims and the US. Why are you not at least equally concerned about Hindus/Sikhs and Pakistan? Or have you sold your soul to Fai to the extent that you have no concern for the fate of Hindus and Sikhs who form the majority in the country which you call your own?
In all the Kashmir related articles you have written, I have never seen any concern about the fate of the Pandits who have been driven away from their homes. Why is your concern so lopsided?
I prefer hurt feeling tears to funeral tears. Also "worst treatment" is a joke. Muslims in their own country are subjected to far worse. They get frisked in the US when people are wary. In their own countries, when they're wary, they usually end up getting lynched. Also, it counts as a hate crime to actually treat a Muslim in any horrific way as it is any other, which is a mandatory life sentence that rarely finds sympathy from the public even during the trial. You could say Pakistan has laws against harming minorities but the difference lies in this: the US actually enforces them.
quote: One of them said: your passport has too many stamps of visits to Pakistan and Bangladesh and both are Muslim countries. I could not allay their fear on this point. I kept quiet.
Probably next time Kudip Nayar visit to US, they might add " also you write about us in Pakistani Newspapers?
Mr Nayar
Please stop being sanctimonious. The fact is there are anti-US terrorists among Muslims.Now whether they are 0.1% or 99.9%, depends on who is taking the count.But the US have every right to take whatever measures they deem fit to protect their citizen.The US govt's obligation is to it's own citizen, not to the assorted crowd of afghan,bangladeshi,indian,iraqi (the list goes on) etc. But the bottomlone is If you don't like their system, don't go there.
Do agree with you HHH or KKK, whatever it is that u wish to call yourself, that prevention is better than cure but please don't make it sound as if Muslims are a disease of some sort. If you are to base an argument on incidents/actions carried out by certain groups or individuals and conveniently label the blame on entire nations and their beliefs than I suggest you have a look into your own history. If you find history too boring, than please do let me give u a summary of it, after all you americans like everything short, easy and quick. 1. Adolf Hitler, name sounds familiar doesn't it, not an american but definitely a christian, responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Would you blame Christianity, at large, for his actions. I would be looking forward to see your comments if in future Israel made it a law to frisk each and every christian regardless of their nationality and political affiliation at its airports. 2. Don't like Adolf, listen to what William Leahy U.S. Chief of Staff 1942-1949 had to say: "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender ... in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. [Leahy's Memoir, I Was There, pg. 441.] Did Japan ever get an apology for such an act of barbarism, I think not.
The list can go on... but we are not on here to air the dirty laundry, are we?
So I request you to show some substance and culture in your comments, rather than barfing out what cnn and bbc have fed you.
Freedom ends when intrest comes first??.
@HHH:
ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PERCENT AGREED.
HUSSAIN
Those who don't like the treatment they receive at US entry points, better stay home. US or any country which values national security above all else will not -and should not -make any concessions to the inflated egos of persons such as this author's. No one put a gun to your head, sir, and dragged you to America. But, you jumped at the chance. Stay home instead and be happy. If Prakash Karat wants tit-for-tat, by all means institute that and see how long you can sustain it. If we had the same sense of importance of national security as Americans do, 26/11 would never have occurred and we would still not be waiting for those criminals to be punished. There has not been even one instance of terrorism in the US after 9/11 precisely because they take care of their country, we don't give a damn. As far as only Muslims being targeted, well, guess who is to blame for that and why?
@ HHH.....this fake ego is responsible for decline of US......more you behave like this, more you are bound to suffer economically.....you are yet to recover from the jolt india gave by rejecting your fighter planes, rejecting to play in your hands to counter china or pakistan, rejecting to accept your demands on nuclear liability bill......ohh..so many rejections..all you can do is frisk more indians , if that helps......
Can you blame them after Feisal Shahzad & other Muslims trying to terrorize the world. Sadly we Muslims have destroyed our image in the world.
Mr.Nayar, Your words would have carried much more weight if only you had expressed a similar kind of outrage at the Chinese aggression and subsequent occupation of thousands of kms of our land. Similarly, Pakistan too occupies a vast tract of Indian territory illegally, but, instead of expressing your disapproval, it seems, you are busy lighting candles at the Wagah border. Can you tell me Mr. Nayar, what is more insulting, someone not treating your elderly with due respect or forcibly occupying a portion of your home? I am as much angry at the treatment meted out to our most beloved ex-president, Dr.Kalam, by the American rednecks, but, the US government has unconditionally apologized to both, Dr.Kalam and Govt.of India. What more should have been done, in your opinion? Should Prs.Obama's resignation over the issue would have satisfied you? What do you mean by "routine type of apology"? Is there any special type of apology? That is ridiculous. All I can say is that, by writing this kind of anti-American article, you are trying to unite subcontinentals under the umbrella of anti-Americanism which is no longer relevant and sustainable. In today's world we need Americans more than they need us, particularly when Chinese are flexing their muscles in Asia. Besides, Americans have been more or less fair to us during the recent years and then why we should be jingoistic towards them?
It doesn't seem different than the treatment us Americans randomly receive when we fly. Patting down a diplomat doesn't violate international treaties; if he's carrying something sensitive it should go in a sealed diplomatic bag accompanied by a courier.
Diplomats simply shouldn't take it personally. This is one of the changes - perhaps the biggest - Osama Bin Laden made to American culture.We all suffer for it and nobody is exempt, just lucky.
pardon me the spell error it's "kalam"
"Yet this only confirmed my suspicion that the Americans treat people from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh as fodder. We are too poor and too divided. That is our problem and we need to solve it." Hope our military jihadists and anti-indian bigots will soon feel this need.
Sorry but dont agree with u.Prevention is better than cure,so what if Lalam is an ex-president. from 9/11 to the faisal shehzad incident muslims have proven to be untrustworthy and if u dont like our security procedures please stop coming to the US.