Pakistan and India at the United Nations

Let not positional divisions of yesteryears prevent us from moving forward in fostering greater consensus on issues.

Saleem H Ali November 06, 2011

The last few weeks have been a momentous time at the United Nations in so many ways. In the aftermath of the Palestinian application for state recognition, the spotlight fell on the most enduring alliances in world affairs — such as the one between Israel and the United States. But there were other interesting happenings at the United Nations Plaza in New York as well. Arch-rivals India and Pakistan joined ranks as temporary members of the Security Council after Pakistan garnered 129 out of 193 votes in the General Assembly — exactly the two-thirds majority required to win the seat.

While the all-powerful veto from the five permanent members of the council (United States, Russia, China, UK and France) renders the temporary members relatively powerless, the UN Security Council pedestal is nevertheless important in times of crisis. The Security Council is the only UN body with ‘teeth’ to sanction armed intervention and votes of temporary members can make an important policy statement about world affairs. They can also be used as a means of leverage for soliciting aid and have regional repercussions for alliances between states.

It is also significant that China and India both supported Pakistan’s bid from the Asian region against regional friend Kyrgyzstan. Pakistan and India will be on the council together for one year since India’s term will expire at the end of 2012 while Pakistan’s will continue for another year. There have been three previous times that the two countries have served together on the council: 1968, 1977 and 1984. The geopolitical landscape was very different then — the Cold War was still hot and the power of multinational globalisation had not been fully unleashed on the subcontinent.

The United Nations is not as popular in India as it is in Pakistan. Recall that Pakistan loves to brandish non-compliance with UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir, which is exactly why many Indians resent the forum. It is now high time that the importance of multilateralism be considered more objectively during this opportunity for Pakistan and India to serve together on the Council. Let us not let positional divisions of yesteryears prevent us from moving forward in fostering greater consensus on issues of substance.

Finally some words about UN governance through ‘country-voting’ that has come under much attack in recent days due to the Unesco admission of Palestine. The democratic process by which countries are given an opportunity to vote should be respected. This is among the few places where the weak can voice their views. To dismiss the verdict of the majority as inherently flawed — as the United States is doing in its uncompromising opposition to Palestinian membership — is misguided. If we are to operate under a nation-state model of fractured governance, we have to play by its rules. It is also quite offensive and patronising to suggest that poorer and smaller countries are somehow inherently biased against Israel or other causes with which the dominant powers may disagree. I hope Pakistan and India will also show due respect to the voice of the world on matters that they might not concur with completely.

Hopefully human societies will evolve to the point where we can have a hybrid form of global governance whereby the positive attributes of nationalism such as language, cuisine and the arts can be retained but the negative aspects of tribalism that lead to exclusion and conflict will be eroded. The European Union is a prototype for such a model but it is incomplete and asymmetric.

A multinational community without covetous countries was Gene Roddenberry’s vision in “Star Trek” and while that may always remain in the realm of science fiction, we must still yearn for such an ideal. In the words of Carl Schurz, a distinguished US Civil War general: “Ideals are like the stars, we may never reach them but like the mariners of the sea we chart our course by them”.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 7th,  2011.


Abdul Rehman Gilani | 11 years ago | Reply

@Abbas from the US:

Your most welcome.

Terrorising and true | 11 years ago | Reply

@Abdul Rehman Gilani: And so a Pakistani goes on - "Denial is thy birth right and i shall have it forever.."

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read