Pakistan-India trade breakthrough

Granting MFN status to India may open up a period of peace between the traditional enemies.


Editorial November 05, 2011

By approving the grant of ‘Most Favoured Nation’ (MFN) status to India, the cabinet in Islamabad has done what it was supposed to do 16 years ago after becoming a founding member of the World Trade Organisation. By staying away from this requirement, it retarded the benefits that were going to accrue from the South Asian Free Trade Area (Safta) of 2004. Trading with India on the basis of a 2,000-item ‘positive list’, Pakistanis kept complaining of India’s non-tariff barriers, only to hear the counter-accusation that Pakistan was withholding the MFN status it had given to all other trading partners in the world. India had sensibly granted that status to Pakistan in 1996.

The opposition in parliament has complained that the decision of opening up trade with India was not taken with the approval of parliament. As per the constitution both in India and Pakistan, only the annual budget is put before the parliament for scrutiny and criticism and voting. Even now, the members can present a motion for the discussion of the MFN status, but unless the opposition has the required numbers in the house, they can hardly do anything. The stance taken by the PML-N is even stranger because its leader Nawaz Sharif has recently expressed enthusiasm for improving relations with India. Outside parliament, there are other offended voices too.

Many other voices are being heard over the media saying the same sort of incongruous things, but the truth is that human memory remembers only one truth: when there is trade there is no war, and vice versa. The world, including Pakistan’s all-weather friend China, has welcomed the inauguration of free trade between India and Pakistan. The world has welcomed the development being aware of the India-Pakistan trade imbalance. Those who lean on this argument project statistics from a period where trade was not liberalised. Looking at Sri Lanka-India figures after the two went into free trade relations would have been more relevant.

One should also recall that Pakistan is ready to allow India passage of goods to Afghanistan through a transit route and that Pakistan is already preparing a ‘negative list’ of tradable goods. On the other side of India, Bangladesh too is moving from a semi-free trade regime with India to a full-dress Safta arrangement. According to estimates, the bilateral trade which grew tenfold from 2000 to 2010, will now touch the figure of $10 billion in two years. There is no doubt that the two sides will have to thrash out the problems faced by all free-trading states and the foremost among these would be India’s non-trade barriers. All the smuggling that goes on and the extra money Pakistanis have to pay for Indian goods because of the UAE route will be removed.

The Saarc Chamber of Commerce & Industry in its 2011 session in Sri Lanka discussed the issues of South Asian connectivity, which is the next step India and Pakistan need to take after they have normalised bilateral trade. It was observed that due to poor connectivity, South Asian countries had failed to tap into 72 per cent of the trade potential of $65 billion available in 2011. The issues of connectivity in the region should not be confined to trade, but need to “reach the realms of not only railway and road corridors but also to inland waterway transport and aviation”.

Another name for avoidance of war is codependency. Any pledge of avoidance of war given in a treaty is not as reliable as the ground reality of benefit derived by neighbouring states from each other. In the coming days, one very important factor of codependency is going to be connected with the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project, which India, despite its consistent hesitation, will be in a better position to exploit than Pakistan because of its much larger economy. The transit route Pakistan is now envisaging for India through its territory will be historically transformational for Pakistan itself — though not so much for India — and will change its political stance forever in favour of the vision it has subscribed to under Saarc.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 6th, 2011.

COMMENTS (4)

optimist | 12 years ago | Reply

There will be troubles along the way but our economic interests will keep the peace. Once you have something to lose, you become more protective. . It is indeed more a good news for Pakistan than anyother country.

Jan Sher Khan | 12 years ago | Reply No Trade with India who has been Massacring innocent Kashmiri brothers, No Trade Until they stop Butchering Kashmiris. We don't need free trade Area with India,. bangladesh Want this then tey should do it. We don't need it and want it either. India is an enemy nation and always proved that for Pakistan. Pakistan should watch with care and there is absolutely no need to start free trade with such nation who from 1947 did nothing but killed Muslims of subcontinent. Unless this behavior changes There should be no trade at all and there should be no right to transportation through Pakistani soil to central Asia Central while at the same time they are slaughtering Kashmiri Muslims.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ