This extreme brutality has turned the Pakistani public against them. This swing in public opinion had the potential of turning the population against religious fundamentalism in all its manifestations. To counteract this swing, right-wing forces within the Pakistani mainstream media have very successfully convinced large segments of the Pakistani population that these attacks are not being carried out by religious fundamentalists but by the intelligence agencies of India, Israel and the United States. This deliberate confusion has dissipated the energy of the masses that would otherwise have been directed against the religious fundamentalists.
What can we do? Firstly, we have to fight against the confusion created by right-wing forces. Arguments such as: this is America’s war; the Taliban are fighting US occupation and should be supported; opposition to Taliban is an elitist, pro-imperialist, NGOist demand; opposition to the Taliban means opposition to Islam; and let the Americans fight the Taliban to understand that the increasing power of religious fundamentalism implies proportionately decreasing power for the people.
US imperialism or the armed forces of Pakistan are interested only in fighting those religious fundamentalist groups that are no longer under their control. They are not interested in fighting religious fundamentalism as a whole. If they are able to come to an agreement over the spoils of exploitation, they will be at peace with each other as they were during the Cold War.
For the people, it is different. In order to emancipate ourselves, we must confront and defeat religious fundamentalism as a whole. We must recognise that behind the façade of religion are the class interests of tribal heads and jagirdars. We must recognise that behind the façade of fighting US occupation of Afghanistan is a history of collaboration with imperialism. We must recognise that today these forces have become the most important impediment to the emancipation of the people.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 4th, 2011.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Absolutely endorse this article and, I must add, after a long while I'm reading an article on ET that I agree with! As it is, with a tottering US exiting Afghanistan and potentially washing its hands off the mess it created, we will have to face the brunt of a renewed wave of Islamic fundamentalism on our own. We should ideologically prepare ourselves for that impending struggle.
Prof you don't even have a clue what causes militancy in this country. For every one person that opposes a Taliban, there are 3 others that support the idea. Your narrative is flawed.
But truth is this if U.S.A did not help pakistan during all these years who knows how pakistan would have today there are some good side of united states is too we have to blame our crrupt peoples either politicions or Bearocracy fuedals Shurfah...
ET, kindly publish this comment, if you follow the norms of tolerance and freedom of expression
How ironic that the institution at which the writer (who belongs to a Communist Party) teaches, LUMS, was itself founded out of USAID, as stated by US Ambassador Cameron Munter in an article today, and I quote:
"In the 1980s, with USAID’s assistance, Pakistan’s private industry founded the Lahore University of Management Sciences. Pakistanis approached us with the idea for the new institution and we agreed to support it with a contribution of $10 million. Today, LUMS incubates the ideas and nurtures the leaders who are critical to Pakistan’s future."
What has the writer got to say now? Will he leave LUMS too, declaring it a "symbol" of US imperialism?
Your band was singing "Riasat ho ge maan ke jesey" to get 2 Chief Justices restored. One in Supreme Court and other in Lahore. Lahore one is now defending Qadri and Supreme Court one is freeing every terrorist. Have you ever thought about their support for terrorism?
It really is annoying how Pakistanis have short memories and are willing to show sympathy to murdering criminals by calling them 'their brothers'.
It's warped dogma and their stupidity and prejudice should be put into place.
Say no to supporting any kind of militants. Say no to Wahhabi/Salafi/Deoband or whatever other ideological sub-sect extremists. Just say NO to these Kharjites.
Religion mixed with politics is always bad. When Mulla starts giving lectures on politics and a politician starts appeasing Mullas, destruction can't be too far. Some one has to bell the Mulla cat. Sooner its done, better it will be.
Terrorism? No terrorism, only disgruntled tribal people who will chase out terrorists when America leaves. Its only Zardari and Nawaz Sharifs fault. Going back to the late 1970s, the ISI and Army have been taking their orders and constructued this mess! Looks like you are not informed like others!
Salman Taseer was not killed by a member of the TTP, but his own bodyguard, who is a member of the supposedly 'moderate' barelvi sect.
The second paragraph is an eye-opener. What could have been a great opportunity to root out support for terrorism one and for all has unfortunately been squandered to infantile conspiracy theories. Even Saudi Arabia had to face a campaign of terrorism, and yet they were able to root out criminal elements successfully. To realize that goal many thousands of teachers and preachers were replaced, madrassas and mosques brought under government purview, terror cells were uprooted through superior and concerted intelligence effort, and a broad public campaign was launched to reduced sympathies for radical elements. To achieve that kind of success, the government, military, public and the religious establishment would have to unanimously take a stand against radicalism and terrorism. That however does not seem to be happening any time soon.
well said prof. keep it up.
wow.. are you really an Assistant Poly Sci prof?? What did they teach you at poly sci school? Only facts and figures and no analysis? I expected better from you taimur.