Spot-fixing jury retires to deliberate verdict

Salman, Asif’s fate in spot-fixing case to be decided soon.


Express October 27, 2011
Spot-fixing jury retires to deliberate verdict

LONDON: The jury in the alleged spot-fixing trial that involved banned Pakistan players Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif retired to deliberate the verdict after the judge summed up proceedings yesterday.

Justice Cooke completed his summation on the 17th day of the trial and offered some guidance to the jury, comprising 12 people, which will decide the fate of the duo.

Butt and Asif face charges of conspiracy to cheat, and conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments, following the Lord’s Test in August last year when they allegedly conspired with agent Mazhar Majeed and teenage fast bowler Mohammad Amir and other people unknown to bowl pre-planned no-balls. Butt and Asif deny the charges.

“The only satisfactory verdict in a criminal trial is a unanimous verdict,” said the judge. “I do not want to hear anything about majority decisions at the moment.”

The judge may consider a majority verdict, though, should there not be a decision within several days. Meanwhile, the two Pakistan cricketers also require visa extensions in case the verdict is delayed beyond October 31, the day when their visa expires.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 28th, 2011.

COMMENTS (9)

Prudent | 13 years ago | Reply

@You Said It:

definition of extradite is "Extradition is the official process whereby one nation or state surrenders a suspected or convicted criminal to another nation or state." I request that.....if you do not know legal terms, legal process, legal methods and laws then do not spread wrong notions unknowingly and ...NO ...I do not have experience of a criminal in my immediate family..but being a lawyer I know many cases who were wrongly implicated in foreign countries without any proof and even our embassy was slow to react in those cases....it was lawyers like me and NGOs who got some of those inoocent people safe.....and LASTLY IF YOU CAN NOT UNDERSTAND then what can I say...I never say they are innocent...but they are people who were forced to do a crime on cricket field by a bunch of journalists,betters ....so even if they deserve punishment , that should be done in perspective of circumstances ........ lastly when I said harping...it was said with sarcasm...if you know what sarcasm is..

You Said It | 13 years ago | Reply @Prudent You think asking for honesty and truth is harping - obviously we have nothing in common, fortunately. if your son or father is indicted in a crime in a foreign country then you will go to foreign office and ask them to help extradition to Pakistan Looks like you have experience relating to crime in your family and foreign countries, so I understand your "prudent" thesis on the subject. In any case, you should look up the meaning of the word "extradition" before using it - I think the concept has been lost on you. I don't subscribe to cockamamie theories so I'll leave the genuflection on "crime psychology" to conspiracy theorists like you. Enjoy the fantasy world you live in.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ