“There is no such deal in place. There were nine drone attacks in three years [during my time]. The deal was to fight extremism and terrorism, to defeat al Qaeda and Taliban,” Musharraf clarified. Senator Graham backed him up saying “there has been no deal, we have a common interest to eliminate the threat to innocent lives and for that we need to eliminate the source of that threat”.
Graham went on to say that the partnership between Pakistan and the US was extremely crucial and both countries need to work through this difficult phase.
Musharraf added that the "drones did technically violate the sovereignty of Pakistan," and created antipathy against the US through collateral damage which had contributed to the souring relations between Pakistan and US making the strikes counterproductive. However the senator sidestepped the question saying that both sides understood that they were pursuing a common objective of eliminating the threat to innocent lives and that the drones had demonstrated to be an effective tool to accomplish while it respects the sovereignty of foreign nations.
Musharraf suggested that a solution needs to be found since the drones did provide the benefits of killing militants.
“In the final analysis, terrorism needs a political solution, but steps need to be taken to limit the loss of lives by those who are willing to take the violent route,” Graham said.
Asked whether US troops on the ground would multiply terrorism, Musharraf said that it would not be wise (for the US) to come into North Waziristan, a military excursion into the area would create a terrible mess as it would ratchet up the anti-American sentiment
Musharraf also voiced his opposition to complete fencing of the Pak-Afghan border citing the difficulty in putting up a manned fence over very rough terrain, the un-resolved legal aspect of the border complicates this. “An obstacle like a fence is not effective till it is manned. Unless it is manned, anyone with a wire cutter can get through”.
A solution, Musharraf proposed, was selective mining along with fencing in areas where applicable would be most effective, adding that 35 kilometres of the border had been fenced.
In response to a question Musharraf admitted that there was a policy error of not weaning the Pakhtoons to away from the Taliban since all Taliban were Pakhtoon. He said that the window between 2002 – 2004. Senator Graham too said that the US was not targeting the Pakhtoons.
Senator Graham also admitted that his country had made a serious mistake in ignoring Afghanistan while attacking Iraq.
Musharraf defended the ISI over the discovery of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, after being reminded that in his own book,' it was mentioned that a senior al Qaeda leader Al-Libbi had three safe houses in Abbottabad. Musharraf said that it was “not a case of complicity but of serious negligence and failure of human intelligence”. The former head of Pakistan’s army said that he had been monitoring all television channels of Pakistan following the raid and found that no local resident interviewed knew whether he was living there. Though many other high ranking al Qaeda leaders had been caught in Pakistani cities.
Answering a question about the future of Afghanistan, Senator Graham said that it was up to the people of Afghanistan determine the future of the country and hoped that they could find a political solution in the short window they had to establish a stable government takes over that seeks peace and economic prosperity . Musharraf said while Pakistan’s interest was in a peaceful Afghanistan, he was more interested in whether the US would be leaving lock stock and barrel in 2014 and whether Afghanistan would return to 1989 or 1996 position once that happened.
Asked about the recent statement of Karzai of Afghanistan backing Pakistan in a US vs Pakistan war, Musharraf called it preposterous and chose not to comment on it.
Defending his rule, Musharraf said that Dictator or dictatorship was “a state of mind and I was extremely democratic in my approach and introduced grass roots democracy”.
Responding to a question over his enlightened moderation campaign which has seemingly failed in today’s Pakistan, Musharraf said that it was not easy to change a mindset of 170 million people. The process required a government committed to move towards moderation along with a mixture of poverty alleviation and education along with a couple of decades and a lot of patience.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Musharaf the True leader and representative of Pakistan!
"The Platform" is a co-production of the Voice of America and Pakistan's "Express 24/7" cable channel. Mr. Musharraf appeared at the VOA studios in Washington.
Drone attacks in three years time is not allowing drone attack its just acceptance of its need and efficacy in absence of any other rational way. Also 9 attacks in 3 years time is not a direct blow to sovereignty but accepting help from allies in a common war. At a time of war practicality and end results are also a major influence in any decision, and General Musharraf is totally justified in his statements. Now giving a free hand to US army against IMF next installment that is a blow to sovereignty all thanks to our so called democratic government. Its also so true that until the political drama began Musharraf's term was the best of recent times despite our being at war.
Mr. Musharraf its ur govt. gift and now ur comments are like nervous breakdown for us.
Solute to Musharraf who did care for Pakistan while he was ruling and who still cares being an ordinary Pakistani. He was more democratic than the plotical dictators.
@hamza khan: You deserve compliments on the importance of a few words. We all know Mr. Musharraf is an American 'fawn' and spends the better part of his retired life, self-exiled in America. Maybe he was making advance preparations to settle there? Salam.
@Shah: You are so right.
This man is now giving lectures abroad to show the image of Pakistan which he himself ruined.
Except there isn't any sovereignty to violate.
Under post-9/11 UNSC resolutions, especially 1373, Pakistan has the binding sovereign obligation to root out terrorists, terror havens, and terror-training camps from its territory. Failure to at least make an effort to do so - as Pakistan did with Osama Bin Laden and does now with the Afghan Taliban and LeT - means it has no grounds to complain when others act to do so on territory that is nominally Pakistani.
Mr. ex-President Musharraf! It is difficult to believe what our leaders have been telling us for the last three decades. Only party acolytes and sycophants will belive and applaud.
Just what do you mean by 'technically violate sovereignty?' Please clarify? And why are you spending most of your productive non-presidential life in America? Dont you realize the sufferings and privations of the Pakistani flood affectees and citizens of Pakistan? Getting backed up by Senator Bob Graham, is no big achievement. It is a servile form of 'handshake.
The sovereignty of Pakistan was lost decades ago when our oustanding foreign debt exceeded a few billion US Dollars. So there should be no talk of sovereignty, please. Salams.
@hamza khan: but the ignorance musharraf showed wasn't needed either
Musharraf is the only Pakistani leader who always speaks the truth. He may not tell you all the answer but will never lie to you .
Thank You Musharraf
Mr Musharaf,technically you should memorise Article 6 of the Constitution
@Hamid:
what force? you wanted pakistan to fight the US? im glad you're not the leader. this stuff requires more sensibility. personal bravado is not needed.
Sir,
I understood Drones, tecnically didn't viotate. Bcos it only recongnise borders feeds to it. But Sir, I assume, You know exact boundaries of Pakistan!
Or you also don't know?
Mr. Musharraf you did technically allow drones. I mean, you ignored the first attack, if you had responded to the first drone attack with force, there would not have been more.
We are unnecessary sensitive about the sovereignty issues. American troops are based in many countries all over the world including European countries. why sovereignty is not an issue in Korea or Japan where American troops are stationed. We have no sovereignty issues when we beg all around the world for every sort of assistance but at the same time want to show the world that we are most proud nation in the world.
Mush says there was only 9 drone attacks. He was a Military Dictator cum President at the time & how did he allow that? OBL has been eliminated & what did our Army do?