Even when both countries were close allies of the United States, their deep mutual mistrust could hardly be camouflaged by their common dependence on the US security umbrella. But it was of course, the Islamic Revolution, which not only shattered America’s carefully crafted strategic fabric for the area, but transformed its ‘regional policeman’ into its sworn enemy.
But nothing could have prepared anyone for recent US claims of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador in Washington. Even by the standards of weird behaviour common to many intelligence agencies, the American accusation appears not in keeping with Tehran’s track record. That the Iranians would hire an American-Iranian used-car salesman and a Mexican drug cartel member to carry out this bizarre plot, raises a host of questions. Admittedly, Tehran’s pronouncements have occasionally sounded strange, but its leaders have demonstrated great pragmatism and realism, as evident from their reaction to the American invasion of Iraq and earlier to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
Its timing too, has led experts and even retired intelligence officials to stress that having weathered the worst pressures from the US, especially on its nuclear programme, why would Iran provide the US former with an excuse to ratchet up pressure on her? Recent developments in the region, especially Iran’s increased influence in Iraq and Lebanon, while bastions of Sunni power such as Egypt and Bahrain are confronted by increasing domestic turmoil, make such a plot inexplicable. Some, however, have pointed out that US, Israeli and Saudi efforts to sabotage Iran’s nuclear programme (including reported Saudi involvement in the Iranian nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri’s defection to the US in 2009) may have prompted elements in Iran’s intelligence agencies to approve this rogue operation. Nevertheless, as the American scholar, Valy Nasr commented: “It is a high risk, low yield manoeuvre and doing it on US soil would be even more baffling”. Even CIA veteran, Ray Cline, was constrained to warn that “whoever concocted this tale wanted to precipitate a major crisis between Iran and the US”, and then asked “which government in the Middle East would like to see those relations take a big step towards military confrontation”.
What is, however, worrying is the manner in which US leaders, including Vice President Joe Biden and even President Barack Obama have stepped in to pronounce on a matter which is still in the early stages of investigation. Biden’s warning of “serious consequences”, Obama calling the plot “a flagrant violation” of international law and US legislators declaring it an “an act of war” not only against Saudi Arabia but against Israel, have set alarm bells ringing.
Regrettably, it appears that we may be witnessing the most dramatic escalation in tension between the US and Iran in years. In such a situation, it is incumbent on countries that wish to see peace in the region, to counsel restrain on all sides. Unless they agree to take immediate measures to de-escalate, they could be locking themselves in untenable positions from where a pull-back may appear much too humiliating. One can only hope that President Obama demonstrates leadership qualities — admittedly in short supply — and is not swayed by either re-election considerations or pressures of the neocons, to re-enact the sordid drama played in the UN Security Council when Secretary Collin Powell was literally duped into claiming that the US had irrefutable evidence of Iraq’s nuclear weapon programme, which was later used by the Bush Administration as the casus belli to launch an armed invasion of Iraq. Are we seeing the opening scenes of a similar horror movie?
Published in The Express Tribune, October 19th, 2011.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
What ever the case may be, the region will go into greater turmoil if USA think tanks continue to develop strategies for their re-elections. Iran's turf is totally different from Iraq where vast majority was against the rule of previous elite. Pakistan has to play its cards well which is best to keep quite for a distance.
Our know it all types seem to know it all. They receive personal briefings from world capitals as to what is "really" going on. In addition, our "good" muslimness and conspiratorial mindset blinds us to the fissures between Iranians and Arabs.
@Noor Nabi: This is the messed up perception of your area of the world. It's always about the Muslims. Some conspiracy against Muslims. Nobody is after the Muslims. The only reason it's even a topic of the war is because the terrorists use being Muslim as their motive and to track any enemy you have to follow the trail they themselves leave you. The one thing they go out of their way to leave is "We're Muslim and that's why we don't like you." So it's no surprise things happen to be concentrated in areas with a large Muslim population. If you were Christian I'd be telling you to get off your cross.
I would imagine, Sir, that your wise counsel for restraint on both sides would apply to Pakistan and the US as well.
Thank you for not using the word "crisis" this time.
Yes, it is a US/Zionist conspiracy! Everybody knows that a "true" muslim can not kill another muslim! In Islam, taking one human life is equivalent to killing the entire humanity! etc.
Noor
Like you many in pakistan will be worried ,If Saudi and Iran go to war ,Where will be pakistan loyalty stand with ?
It is tricky situation ,Reason ,Pakistan policy is based on religion and they have played this card for 60 odd yrs succesfully but not now. It is very precarious situation for them.
Just think for a moment ,Indian Muslims ,same size as of pakistan will roam worry free ,doesnt matter to them if saudi fight with Iran.
As long as Religion card will be played by pakistani establishment ,They will drag this nation into more trouble.
The operation smells like Mumbai adventure in its expected end result.
It is obvious that the State of Iran will not be the beneficiary had the operation succeeded. The last thing Israel wants is to get drawn into a wider global middle east conflict.
End objective of the operation? Draw US into open conflict with Iran. Bleed US theory. And the proponents of the theory are........?
Tension diffuser will be for the Iran to apprehend the accused living in Iran. Anything short of that is only going to escalate the situation.
Iran should learn from PAK mistakes following Mumbai events.
This article seems to insinuate that Saudi Arabia is in the US-Israeli camp in ganging up against Iran. The current situation also seems to be a manisfestation of the long-standing Sunni-Shia rivalry within the Islamic world. The Saudi version of Islam does not, by any means, reflect the united stance of the Ummah. The Arab League and the OIC, normally perceived to be two totally useless organisations, should come together to prevent the implementation of a "conspiracy" to make Muslims fight each other. If, God forbid, the Saudis and the Iranians are duped into a war what will be the position of Pakistan? The former finances it through its Zakat fund while the latter is not only an immediate neighbour but can also influence the emotions of Pakistan's shia population. The recent joint military exercises between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are a cause for concern.