A journalist who writes for diverse papers, told me that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani always reminded him of an English gentleman; someone who doesn’t do anything at all, but does it rather well. He has contrived to suggest a life of unruffled serenity even when tackling thorny problems like the pipeline-from-Iran issue — which would greatly benefit Pakistan — and the opposition of the United States to the project. He hates confrontation and usually looks for an easy way out of a crisis, often becoming unnecessarily obsequious as in the case of trying to please the Baloch sardars, who, as long as one can remember, have never been pleased and always appear to be miffed by something or the other.
It is, therefore, no wonder that his government, which is absurdly inefficient, hasn’t come up with a single thought or action by which the people of this country, particularly the women, could benefit. And this is in spite of the existence of Dr Rehman Malik, recently enlightened by Karachi University, possibly for his famous one-liners. His interest never wavers. The solipsism is utter hermetic, the concentration and self absorption resolute and utterly engrossed. One of the droll stories that have been circulating on the mobile phone networks suggests; Steve Jobs resigned from his post because Rehman Malik called Apple a banana. But when it comes to doing something positive for the country, like attacking Stone Age customs, Dr Malik is no better than the rest.
In fact, one of the cozily uniting things about the nation, which is still regarded as a community of misogynistic paternalism, is its dismal reluctance to do anything about improving the lot of the women. Now, I never thought I’d say this, but Mr Gilani actually came up with a positive statement a few days ago which was uttered with what passes for enthusiasm in this part of the world. Perhaps through ingrained habit or because any group of more than 20 must constitute an audience, he raised his arms in enthusing benediction and announced that it had always been part of his party’s manifesto to do something for the weaker sex. Hosanna! He is three-and-a-half years too late, because the five-clause Prevention of Anti Women Practices bill has been pending before the house since 2008 but as the old saying goes, better late than never.
The bill in question was sponsored by eight lawmakers of the government allied PML-Q, and spearheaded by a PML-Q MNA, Donya Aziz. But due to some last minute objections and drafting flaws, which is not at all unusual, the passage of the fifth clause of the bill was blocked, and the speaker of the national assembly Fehmida Mirza, had no option but to refer the draft back to the law ministry for further vetting. Strangely enough, the law and parliamentary affairs minister Maula Bakhsh Chandio was absent from the house on this occasion. He was rightly chastised in absentia by the speaker who also fixed a time limit for the vetting and pointed out that whatever portion of the bill had been passed would remain valid.
Pakistan is fortunate to have Fehmida Mirza as a speaker. She is no shrinking violet. She is tough and composed and demonstrated her impartiality when she gave MQM members enough time to rebut the broadsides that had been hurled by her husband against their party. For those readers who have not been following the case, this is a last ditch attempt by a group of brave Pakistani women who are trying to abolish, once and for all, the unjust customs of forcing women into a disagreeable marriage to settle a dispute, vani, being married to the Holy Quran and depriving women of their inheritance — practices that have been condemned even in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where they also have some pretty odious customs.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 19th, 2011.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ayesha and deb..... its usually the priveleged classes whose women get married off to the Quran, cuz those are the families who have the inheritances that they dont want to give away... and in pakistan, all women, barring a very few, from all walks of life need protection. saying that, i agree that what benazir did not do for women during her 2 tenures was wrong, and it was sad for all women.
Very well put. Most of us miss the point that only the oppressed and the under priviledged needs protection and only the mighty and powerful are priviledged to provide that protection.
ppp had a woman prime minister but then women belonging to that class and status do not reuqire such bills to protect them. these are the need f the poor, oppressed often illiterate masses, no concern of theirs.
great piece....but we've got the likes of israrullah zehri still in parliament who calls burying women alive 'culture'.....so you see the trouble we are in...
Good on you for bringing this up!
Great article. The male lawmakers warming the seats of the senate and parliament should be ashamed of themselves and their below-par efforts.
Thank you Mr Mooraj for this rare article obliquely supportive of women's rights. Despite the fact that the PPP had the honor of attaining the first woman Prime Minister in Pakistan's history and also the first woman Speaker of the National Assembly, it appears to be hamstrung by fear of provoking the religious extremists when it comes to legislation to change the lives of women in Pakistan.
Please continue your efforts in this area there are far too few and very rare that Pakistani male writers take up issues that they consider provocative.