With around 50 per cent of the population below 20 years and 60 per cent below 30 years, Pakistan is poised for a ‘demographic dividend’, with its workforce growing at a faster rate than total population. This trend is estimated to continue for the next 30-40 years, depending upon the country’s pace of development. Pakistan’s population is projected to reach a staggering 350 million by 2050, almost double its present size, not a very encouraging indicator by itself. But the projected age structure in various demographic studies shows a sizable share to be occupied by the working age group progressively.
On a regional level, demographic changes are evident in other countries like China and India as well. China is now in the post-transitional phase with its population below 14 years declining, compared to that above 65 years which is fast increasing. China’s economic rise in the past decades, owes substantially to its demographic change that occurred early on and also the fact that it channelised its labour force effectively to boost its export-oriented industry, a policy adopted earlier by the East Asian Economies with their outward looking strategy coupled with plentiful supplies of adaptive labour force that helped them create their ‘economic miracles’. China is now faced with the next step in the process, one of an aging population and a shrinking workforce. Labour is already becoming expensive in China.
India is expected to receive maximum demographic advantage in the next few decades. With 25 per cent of the projected increase in global working population estimated to occur in India, it is poised to add over 300 million working age people to its ranks by 2040, making it the largest contributor to global workforce in the next 30 years. The challenge for both Pakistan and India is again to catalyse and capture the true strength of their burgeoning work force through effective policies in the coming decades.
So, how can Pakistan benefit from this opportunity? The immediate challenge is to educate and provide technical and professional training to its work force. Next is the creation of productive jobs in the economy through targeted expansion and growth. Pakistan should seek mutual investment opportunities with other countries in the region. But trade will spur growth and economic activities only if export-oriented policies provide the required impetus to the industry and businesses to move into high value added processes and up the value supply chains. With failing power, gas and water infrastructures, essential inputs to any industry, the challenges are varied and many.
A successful outcome will finally depend on the economy’s ability to absorb the multiplying work force into productive employment. This requires a proactive approach from policy makers to develop a comprehensive framework for infrastructure development and manpower training. The immense benefits and equally innumerable risks involved have to be timely realised.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 18th, 2011.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rambo:
I am not boasting but merely telling the truth. Boasting is when I lie. I challenge you to point out a single point.
Why seek the truth when you cant handle it?
Educated employable employed youth is a dividend uneducated unemployable and unemployed youth is a nightmare
Nice to read a competent and sober analysis of the subject that outlines the potential for progress as well as possible challenges. Unfortunately vulgar geopolitical propaganda using the words "bomb" and "dangerous place" often dominates mainstream media discussions of population re Pakistan in both Western as well as English speaking media in Pakistan.
@Ali Tanoli thats the beauty of the competition and open market. not only 'value for money' is the prime factor but other factors like skillness, flexibility, adoptibility, availability, employability also play roles. modern businesses and its managements take such decisions after careful study of decision matrix. and every factor is in favor of indians. mostly all of the industries are short of skilled manpower and can't find in europe. so they goes to india and comes back happily. sometime back, i heard a news that, established french winery employed 2 indian girls aged 20 and 23; because they couldn't find competitive wine tasters. the girls were offerred hefty salary package, accomodation, car and other perks. world is finding indian skilled workforce with any combination of skills. now you being a pakistani, should more talk about your situation. or you don't have any ?
@BruteForce - Stop boasting!! . . . . . Without exploiting the US jobs, you are shamefully nothing!!!!
@ UK muslim, Its all about busniss indian english speaking labour force is much cheaper in the market and also indian govt does lot of afford providing jobs to there peoples and in pakistan our govt and army junta are just busy in loot so some one will have to fill in the gap u know what i am saying...
last summer i went for a cruise holidays for 14 days from UK to Norway. on that cruise, (receptionists, radio officers, communication officers, chefs in the kitchen in back, chief engineer, ranked electrical and michanical engineers, sailors) atleast 60% but not less was skilled indian workforce. and rest were east europeans and west europeans. its amazing that india is supplying english speaking skilled workforce for running the businesses.
now in pakistan's case, talibani style rule will force women not to study or work. this single rule, will cut the workforce by half. rest of the workforce (men) mostly inclined to the extremism will not be a favourite choice (as employees) of global businesses. and to form major/global industry hub within coutry, you do not have resources or environment. current picture is not good.
In 2005, Goldman Sachs had published a paper called the Next 11, countries with high potential of becoming the world's largest economies in the 21st century. It would be helpful to revisit their criteria and see how many are still applicable to Pakistan. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Next_Eleven
@faraz: Pakistan certainly has the millions of indoctrinated gun-toting masses, but there is no unifier and master strategist like Gengiz Khan. Pakistan has already launched a number of military offensives - 1948, 1965, 1971, 1999 against India as well as unofficial offensives in support of the Mujahideen and the Taliban in Kashmir and Afghanistan. Unlike the Mongols though, it hasn't captured anything, though it has achieved a Mongol scale destruction of Afghanistan.
@Truth Seeker: "If the whole world policy makers have not succeeded to reign in this dragon, how can policy makers of an incompetent and ineffective government will do this miracle?" The populations has not only stopped growing but started declining for many countries in the world. This includes most West European countries, Japan, Russia, Singapore etc. Even in India where progress has not been as good in lowering fertility as some othe rplaces, a woman in 1960 used to give birth to 6 kids on an average. The numberhas come down to 2.3 now.
Anyway this article is ot about how to reduce fertility. But rather given that the working age population is going to swell, how can we proactively plan for this situation so that the country is able to harnes this youth bulge to the advantage of the country overall as well as its individual citizens.
350 million and 60% below 30 years?! All the more reason for US to produce more drones!!
But how many of these youths will become part of the good Taliban and shun the bad Taliban.
If we had been living in medieval era, with millions of indoctrinated people in gun carrying age (15-64 years), we could have launched a military offensive at a global scale, like the Mongol invasions. But in the 21st century, this will only become a dividend for terrorist, sectarian, ethnic, separatist and criminal gangs
Very optimistic take on the increasing Pakistani population forcasted to touch 339 million in 2040. The flip side is that an increasing male youth population that does not see an economic future in their destiny could also be available as cannon fodder to the Jihadis. As for the female population increasingly joining the work force, at this point there is a gloomy outlook as to whether the female population will be allowed to freely join the vocation of their choice or be relegated to permanent servitude of their chauvanistic male masters that is their current destiny. Even if this rosy picture turns out to be true, resources will have to be made available in terms of health, education and housing to fullfill expectations of this emerging middle class. Further, if the long awaited prosperity were to finally materialize that Pakistanis have dreamed of for a few generations now, the birth rate that produces this booming population would also suffer a period of decline with increasing education, along with similar problems that China faces today of the dependency ratio, would be forced onto economies like India and Pakistan when it would be a similar situation in a few decades.
Hopefully indviduals trained in the planning side of the public administrations like the writer, would be able to deliver.
Honest but futile attempt, as the policy makers are aware of the fact that 'Productive Industry' base at human couple's level in Pakistan is so vast that huge tangible improvements in other sectors will not be able to create even trivial benefits for the public. Draconian measures to control population growth are needed to achieve those results projected by Ms. Bokhari. Why look at the chart below and decide:
Year World Population Addition 8000 B.C 5,000,000 3000 B.C 15,000,000 10,000,000 (5,000 Years) 1 A.D 200,000,000 185,000,000 (3,000 Years) 1800 A.D 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 (1,800 Years) 1920 A.D 2,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 120 Years) 1960 A.D 3,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 40 Years) 1968 A.D 3,500,000,000 500,000,000 ( 8 Years) 1999 A.D 6,000,000,000 2,500,000,000 ( 31 Years) 31/10/2011 7,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 12 Years)
If the whole world policy makers have not succeeded to reign in this dragon, how can policy makers of an incompetent and ineffective government will do this miracle?
What about madrassas and eduction provided by them? Can they reap the benefits of this demographic "bulge"?
Honest but futile attempt, as the policy makers are aware of the fact that 'Productive Industry' base at human couple's level in Pakistan is so vast that huge tangible improvements in other sectors will not be able to create even trivial benefits for the public. Draconian measures to control population growth are needed to achieve those results projected by Ms. Bokhari. Why! look at the chart below and decide:
Year World Population Addition 8000 B.C 5,000,000 3000 B.C 15,000,000 10,000,000 (5,000 Years) 1 A.D 200,000,000 185,000,000 (3,000 Years) 1800 A.D 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 (1,800 Years) 1920 A.D 2,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 120 Years) 1960 A.D 3,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 40 Years) 1968 A.D 3,500,000,000 500,000,000 ( 8 Years) 1999 A.D 6,000,000,000 2,500,000,000 ( 31 Years) 31/10/2011 7,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 ( 12 Years)
If the whole world policy makers have not succeeded to reign in this dragon, how can policy makers of an incompetent and ineffective government will do this miracle?
we are just busy producing more and more, as well as eliminating more and more (those who disagree with our view), all based on religion. I dont think such matured approach to population control and channeling workforce will ever work for a country like us, which has not only completely failed economically, but is also totally bankrupt in modern ideas, education, health, wisdom...