With ties between Islamabad and Washington slowly getting back on track, Pakistan’s top leadership held separate meetings with visiting US special envoy Marc Grossman to convey to the United States that it could only enter meaningful dialogue on the Afghan reconciliation process and effectively deal with the Haqqani network once its ‘legitimate concerns’ were addressed.
In meetings with US special representative grossman, the country’s top civil and military leadership voiced a host of concerns, which included growing Indian influence in Afghanistan and deliberate attempts by certain international and regional players to undermine Pakistan’s role in the reconciliation process, said a Pakistani official familiar with the development.
(Read: Pakistan welcomes US initiative for peace in Afghanistan)
This was Grossman’s first visit to Islamabad since Washington accused the country of backing the Afghan Taliban allied insurgent group, the Haqqani network. He began his day-long trip by meeting with Army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi.
A statement issued by the Inter-Service Public Relations (ISPR) said the two discussed measures for a “Pak-US cooperative framework for peace in the region.”
Grossman also met President Asif Ali Zardari, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani and held talks with Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar to discuss a host of issues, including the row over the Haqqani network and the upcoming international conference on Afghanistan in Istanbul next month and in the German city of Bonn in December.
Official sources say Pakistan’s top leadership told the US envoy that the wide-ranging strategic pact signed between Afghanistan and India should not be allowed to have negative implications for the region. “Unless these legitimate concerns are taken care of, it will be very difficult for Pakistan to play the kind of role the US would want it to,” said an official source.
(Read: A warning to Afghanistan)
However, even as the countries attempted to narrow their differences over the ‘deadliest’ Afghan insurgent group, they failed to show any signs of progress on the issue of the Haqqani network in their official announcements.
“The positive public statements you saw today are the reflection of a truce the two countries have achieved privately,” said an American diplomat without giving more details.
Later, at a joint press conference with Foreign Minister Khar, Grossman sought to play down the hype over the strain in ties by claiming that the US is committed to a long-term and enduring partnership with Pakistan. “We tried to think about the future and a way to keep our strategic dialogue going,” Grossman told the joint press conference.
“We also talked about how we can continue in a systematic way to identify the interests that we share with Pakistan, and there are many, and then find ways to act on them jointly,” he added.
Meanwhile, President Asif Ali Zardari, in his meeting with Grossman, expressed Pakistan’s displeasure over what he dubbed ‘verbal assaults’ by senior US officials questioning Islamabad’s commitment in the fight against terrorism.
(Read: Pak-US ties to be based on mutual interest, respect: Zardari)
“This approach only helped the cause of terrorists and undermined bilateral ties,” the president was quoted as telling Grossman by presidential spokesperson Farhatullah Babar.
Separately, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani told Grossman that Pak-US relations must go beyond the security cooperation.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 14th, 2011.
COMMENTS (26)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Nabeel:
"It is strange that Indians call others terrorists and think that Pakistan waged war against India. Have they forgotten what they did in East Pakistan. First they trained and supported Mukti Bahni and then attacked Pakistan. "
True. But, you need also to state the other associated facts. 1971 Indian involvement in East Pakistan was a payback for Pakistan's 1965 invasion of India. Second, India ordered its army into E. Pakistan only after Pakistan started bombing India in the west.
Importantly, if Pakistan had not carried out its 1965 aggression, India would have had no reason to assist E. Pakistan.
Also it is to be noted that, due to Pakistani army's atrocities and the genocide, millions of East Pakistani refugees started flooding India causing major economic and social problems in the eastern states of India.
@Antanu: Bro it is very clear you are a Pakistani and trying to malign the name of Hindus and Indians by posing as one. I suggest you stop trolling as it only brings a bad name to Pakistan.
@sanwar: u r wrong dear. U dont know the psyche of majority hindus in india. I was born a hindu but turned to atheism because of nonsensical practices in the so called religion which is anything but religion.
@Pakistani First: I am an indian without any religion. Normaly hindus are biased again muslims. Look at Iraq. Saddam was a friend of India but what India did when Iraq was being battered by indians. In fact they were chuckling with glee. So dont give any importance to comments. Support what is good for ur country and raise ur voice where u must.
@foruchandan: It is strange that Indians call others terrorists and think that Pakistan waged war against India. Have they forgotten what they did in East Pakistan. First they trained and supported Mukti Bahni and then attacked Pakistan. Strange I think history is not taught in Indian schools.
India also supported Tamils in Siri Lanka. None of Indians neighbours are happy with India and still they think that they are not doing any thing bad.
@Pakistani First: If India is the least of your concerns, why shouldnt i read Pakistani papers? Just because you dont read Indian newspapers, why shouldnt we read your papers. This is like telling a terrorist that dont kill me because i didnt kill anyone. So long brother. We are here to stay. Remember, we are conjoined twins
@Pundit:
Add Graveyard to that
Afghanistan is a hot spot and Pakistan can not tolerate to have any influence of India on a many KM long porous border. Afghanistan must not be under the influence of India or any other nation. Pakistan knows the hostility of India towards Pakistan and we are not kids to believe them that presence of India along our lengthiest border would not be a problem for Pakistan. We played critical role in war against terror and we can not allow India to have a roll in Afghanistan for free and that too, primarily against Pakistan. Afghanistan is an autonomous country and she has a right to choose her enemies and friends. But Pakistan ll logically protect its own national interests. And India`s influence in Afghanistan is not in any way in our interest.
Pakistan is in difficult phase in ties with the United States was over and relations between the two countries were back on track. So instead of commenting on negatives, we should try to focus on the positives in the relationship.
Afghanistan: Strategic Depth Sphere of Influence Back Yard
The US must address Pakistan's concerns in Afghanistan. There is no doubt that it is helping India to establish its presence which is definately injurious to Pakistan security. If US is sincere in maintaing peace and stability in this region its should not increase tensions between the regional countries,rather it should try to assist in resolving the long outstanding issues.
"“We tried to think about the future and a way to keep our strategic dialogue going,” Grossman told the joint press conference. “We also talked about how we can continue in a systematic way to identify the interests that we share with Pakistan, and there are many, and then find ways to act on them jointly,” he added."
This sounds like snakes and ladder.....after being allies for 10 years in the WOT , identification of common interests is not a day too late.
@ Foruchandan
Let me refresh your memory a bit; East Pakistan, Mukti Bahini, Indiar Gandhi, Cross border infiltration; killings of hundreds of thousands... 1971, rings a bell??
Beautiful pic!
india has never harmed Pak, but Pak has always been a spoilt child of Britian and has always been an agrressor n waged wars on INDIA
Does Pakistan think US really cares, especially when you look at the recent activities of Pakistan?
Another special envoy. huh!!!
How can a Strategic Pact or any other Pact between Afghanistan and India can be harmful to us if we only mind our own business and stop sticking our nose where it does not belong. The need of the time is to save our own Crumbling House if we can. The first step in that direction is to demobilize our so called Strategic Assets because these have been doing much more harm to the unity of our country than to India. Second step a serious introspection regarding to who and what we really are and our true capacity to perform as a viable Nation. Third step our financial health, we are a bankrupt country living on handouts should fixing it not be our priority rather than worrying about India. I cannot count the myriad of mistakes we have made in the past simply for self aggrandizing, our leadership are no more than a bunch boastful people be it the Civilians or Khakis who feel really at home issuing bluster after bluster and look where their lies have brought us. Why you keep on using your mouth when you do not have legs to make the delivery of goods.
What are the legitimate concerns that are essential for afghan peace. Have been hearing this even before the Afghan--India pact and hearing the same after that.
Without the clear idea of what they are, the statement like this looks like blackmail diplomacy.