Maulvi Faqir, the most ferocious of the TTP commanders, has put paid to the All-Parties Conference (APC) resolution that mentioned the TTP as “our own people”. The fact of the matter is that the TTP deputy chief’s statement makes it all clear that what his organisation is saying is not really all that different from what Pakistan’s mainstream religious parties, as well as conservative sections of society in general, have been demanding all along. They want Pakistan to sever ties with the US and they want Sharia to be imposed. The latter is the demand of those who run and study in the country’s madrassa network. Of course, the Objectives Resolution is not enough for such elements and they want a more direct imposition. The question is that will the prime minister agree to these two conditions and if so, what would be the repercussions for Pakistan as a whole?
For better or for worse, the APC (which includes the parties that are in government) has handed over policy and its implementation to the military. Will the latter talk to the TTP from a position of weakness? It has just forced the US government to retreat; can it do the same thing with the TTP? Maulvi Faqir has already rejected the possibility, saying that the TTP will not straightaway side with Pakistan and stop killing innocent Pakistanis just because Pakistan has challenged the US through an APC and forced it to backtrack. The truth is that the APC has placed the TTP on a platform of strength in Pakistan from where, if the state negotiates, it will be tantamount to abject surrender.
Acts of high emotion — indulged in by politicians, and prompted in no small measure by sections of the the jingoist media — will not solve Pakistan’s economy and security-related problems. First reports from the captains of Pakistani industries who export to the West, don’t favour a break with the US. External friends like China are watching the scene carefully, reluctant to back Pakistan’s APC games because American presence shores up their own policy against Islamic fanaticism. Iran too prefers America to a repeat of the Taliban rule in Afghanistan backed by unthinking Pakistani soldiers of fortune; it is clearly seen as preferring India there as a make-weight against Pakistan.
As for the Haqqani network, it alone cannot ensure peace even if it responds to the APC’s resolution by acquiescing. Pakistan may not be able to repeat the example of disastrous Taliban government of 1996, which was funded by money from some Gulf states and had our solid backing. And, most importantly, it will not be able to talk to the TTP without losing its current identity as a moderate Islamic state.
The Pakistan Army got Bajaur back in 2010 by all signs after a military operation which turned violent and displaced a large portion of its residents. By June 2011, Maulvi Faqir had resurfaced, reportedly in hideouts just across the border in Afghanistan’s Kunar province, from where he was directing vicious attacks on Pakistani border posts and some villages. A FM radio station, according to several reports, was also back in operation, and this has spread fear among the local people, who may again be compelled to leave their homes. Recently, his men were the ones who had abducted several school children from Bajaur, a sign of how the TTP would rule if it were allowed to by the state: through intimidation and fear, and not via a social contract based on popular consent.
The Pakistan military has a much bigger challenge at home than it realises. It is falsely reassured by a purblind APC. A post-APC Pakistan is thrown into an unrealistic fever. It needs to wake up and tackle the problem of the Taliban, not talk to it from a position of weakness which it wishes to compensate with an illusory position of strength with America.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 5th, 2011.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Why can't the GOP understand the main objective of TTP that they want to rule the country in the name of Islam by enforcing sharia. Those who sympathise with them must judge their means ie killing innocent people which itself is against the Islam principles. Moreover, what sort of governance these illiterate and intolerant lot can offer except jihad and more jihad bringing more violence, anarchy and ultimately disintegeration of Pakistan.
please include the KURRAM ROAD REOPENING as well.We want to be a part of Pakistan.
What about public opinion? If the political parties now in the ruling coalition and even PML (N) did not have the introduction of Shariah in their manifestos when the last General election was contested, than the mandate for this measure does not exist with the current coalition.
The introduction of laws that completely disenfranchises women and openly discriminates against them are contrary to the spirit of Pakistan and what the founding fathers envisioned. These in itself and contradictions inherrent could produce a legal challenge by itself.
As the likelyhood of civil war intensifies in Afghanistan the same will spill over into Pakistan whether Pakistan may want it or not. Pakistanis need to decide the direction that they want to take.
@Peter Chamberlin:
[Any nation that accepts such monsters as “our own people” has absolutely zero chance of ever joining the community of civilized Nations (such as it is)}
The fact that a sizeable percentage of people do actually consider them our own is the greatest mystery of our times. They are willing to protect them from drones but do not utter a single word in defence of unarmed / harmless / innocent / poor Hazara Shias being mercilessly mowed down by them or their bedfellows. I am totally dumbfounded.
@mzee: You must be out of your mind. TTP brand of Islam is not practised in any muslim country not even Saudi Arabia. People like you have absolutely no idea what they are walking into. (Unless you have no qualms on your sister / daughter getting lashed for going with a cousin to hospital in a medical emergency and you are content with primary education for them at the maximum)
It should be an FM radio and not a FM radio as you have written in the editorial.
allot of things will need to go if sharia is enforced .. it should be enforced thou as we ve examples of Arab States. then again lets just pray what ever happens is in the betterment of Pakistan.
I am sick and tired of hearing about peace talks and the fact that war is no solution. Is there anyone out there who can educate me on the Mutually Agreed Terms of Reference for talks with these Ideological Barbarians. As per my limited knowledge their strategy is chillingly simple " My way or your body on Highway". Let the doubters come out in open and contradict me to my everlasting gratitude.
this is good to more stability in pakistan
Is that really the photo of Maulvi Faqir, the most ferocious of the TTP commander? Reason I am asking there is a Mexican gardener who looks just like Maulvi Faqir's twin brother except for the funny hat.
Nice piece on peace prospects. True & deep introspection is the 1st step, just like what they teach in military training > if you have lost the way then stop & find your present own position. Wishing all Pakistanis luck for a stabler & peaceful future.