Making the state fight militancy

When Swat found itself overrun by the Taliban in 2008 and 2009, the state again didn’t seem too bothered.


Asfandyar Khan July 08, 2010

When Swat found itself overrun by the Taliban in 2008 and 2009, the state again didn’t seem too bothered. Instead, parliament voted on the Swat ‘peace’ deal, allowing the Taliban to enforce their idea of law and order on a piece of Pakistani territory. Malam Jabba, Pakistan’s only ski resort for citizens, was razed by the Taliban. Just a few hundred miles away, Peshawar itself stood a different city from that of a decade ago, or even a few years ago.

Yet, just how much blame can be apportioned to the state as an entity that exists beyond its citizens and hence doesn’t care about the security of those very citizens who legitimise it? Pakistan is still a democracy, even with all the rampant corruption and nepotism. So, have we failed as well, meaning that if the state is failing, its constituents, ie us, must be as well? Treating minorities as second-class citizens isn’t just what the state does, it’s what we also do as well, as a society.

By allowing the religious right to influence politics even in the minutiae, we allow by proxy the state to violate the fundamental rights of minorities. When even the educated elite propagate conspiracy theories and buy into anti-Hindu propaganda, elucidated by the likes of Zaid Hamid just where does that then leave our politicians? Can we really be surprised if we continuously hear mention of a ‘foreign hand’? After the Data Darbar attack, there have been multiple protests, most of which have questioned the ability of the PML-N government in Punjab to provide adequate levels of security for the province. Two relationships are particularly called into question here; the PML-N’s increasingly perilous relationship with the SSP, and the ISI’s role vis-à-vis the Taliban.

With Rana Sanaullah’s traipse in Jhang where he met when the head of the SSP Maulana Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi, the PML-N and SSP relationship found itself in the spotlight. Regardless of whether his purpose of meeting the SSP was purely electoral or otherwise, the SSP remains a banned, terrorist outfit and the seeming endorsement of the group by a leading PML-N figure is astonishing. It beckons the question regarding the integrity of the PML-N concerning its ability to govern and provide security for Punjab’s residents. Though the SSP may not be directly involved in the attacks on Ahmadis or Data Darbar, the PML-N cosying up to them has surely created an environment where like-minded groups would feel emboldened.

Ultimately, it’s up to us to put pressure on our politicians and the state — not simply by protests but by adopting ideologies that aren’t ensconced in violence. And for that we need to be all on the same page regarding the imperative for fighting terrorism and militancy head-on.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 9th, 2010.

COMMENTS (6)

ahmad | 14 years ago | Reply Mullahs did and are treating the minorities as second class citizens since ages because in this is their survival and they will do it again and again. Not only Mullahs but every section and institution of the society treat minorities as second class citizen. Our courts always gave biased judgments against ahmdies and in army as well ahmadis are treated as second grade citizens. These things cannot be corrected by cosmetic efforts; we need to do some surgical operation if we are serious to save this country. We have to abolish Article 2 of the constitution which states that Islam shall be the religion of the state. Please understand that Islam not for states, company, organization, etc - it is for the human beings. Please understand before we are too late
Ammar Zafarullah | 14 years ago | Reply We need to inspect the sources that are causing militancy. At the strategy level we need to develop a comprehensive counter terrorism strategy based on an understanding of the militant tactics. The administration also needs to chalk out an official framework for dealing with the problem of extremism and for this we need to empower the National Counter Terrorism Authority. Any policy for counter terrorism must take into account the interest of general public, the state is responsible for the safety of its subjects and for this whatever measures are deemed important must be taken having said that the citizens must play their role as they are the primary stakeholders in the conflict
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ