TODAY’S PAPER | November 13, 2026 | EPAPER

No one is bigger than Pakistan: Vawda

Says the PTI also had capable people who would be given opportunities


Our Correspondent October 17, 2026 1 min read

ISLAMABAD:

Senator Faisal Vawda has said Pakistan is heading towards neither dictatorship nor a presidential system, while criticising what he described as "sham democracy" and saying no prime minister or chief minister was greater than the country.

Speaking on Express News programme Centre Stage, Vawda said ordinary Pakistanis needed basic necessities and services, including flour, sugar, schools, colleges and affordable transport, but those who controlled such resources had become rulers.

He said the living standards of ordinary people had continued to deteriorate, adding that public patience had run out.

Education in Sindh and Punjab was in a worse state than in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), Vawda said, but stressed that the country did not belong to any individual or family.

He said terrorism could not be eliminated within two to four months, although efforts to tackle it would begin. Recalling his remarks in 2018, he said he had called for the military to be respected, arguing that its role had enabled Pakistan to establish itself internationally.

Vawda said the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) also had capable people who would be given opportunities, whether as parliamentarians or in other roles.

PTI leader Ali Muhammad Khan said there was now greater room for dialogue than before, following the removal of the party's provincial government in K-P.

He said securing the release of PTI founder Imran Khan was currently a greater priority than access to medication.

Ali Muhammad Khan said a government enjoying what he described as three-fourths public support had been removed, throwing the country into a volatile situation. He questioned whether the fight against terrorism could be won without the PTI, saying the party had been cooperating.

He described the imposition of governor's rule in K-P as an arbitrary decision.

COMMENTS (3)

Salem Jan | 3 weeks ago | Reply Smaller puppy of field marshal who normally barks exactly how his master told him to do
Salman | 3 weeks ago | Reply Vawda s line is no one is bigger than Pakistan and no prime minister or chief minister was greater than the country. True as slogan but Constitution is how we define what Pakistan is. If no CM is bigger than Pakistan then no senator is also bigger than Constitution. Article 234 says governor rule needs assembly failure or request from province then Parliament approval. Using Pakistan to bypass Constitution is itself saying an individual view of national interest is bigger than Constitution. He says ordinary Pakistanis needed basic necessities and services including flour sugar schools colleges and affordable transport but those who controlled such resources had become rulers. And living standards continued to deteriorate public patience had run out. Correct diagnosis wrong treatment. If people need flour sugar schools you need elected government delivering them. Governor rule puts those resources in hands of even fewer unelected people governor plus advisory council with no assembly to question them. That is more concentration of resources not less. He says Education in Sindh and Punjab was in a worse state than in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa but country did not belong to any individual or family. If KP education was better than Sindh and Punjab which enrolment data supports then logic is to improve Sindh and Punjab not dissolve KP. And KP government does not belong to an individual it belongs to 40 million voters who gave PTI 90 seats. Calling it rule of one family is factually wrong for KP if that argument applies anywhere it applies to the two provinces he names. He says terrorism could not be eliminated within two to four months although efforts to tackle it would begin. If it cannot be eliminated in 2-4 months then emergency which under Constitution is 4 months cannot solve it. Terror needs long-term police funding courts jobs. Those need stable elected government not 4-month emergency that will be extended again and again. He recalls military to be respected arguing its role had enabled Pakistan to establish itself internationally. Respecting military and respecting Constitution go together. Military s own oath is to Constitution. Past operations succeeded when military and elected province worked together Swat 2009 had ANP government on board. He says PTI also had capable people who would be given opportunities whether as parliamentarians or in other roles. That s patronage. Capable people in PTI should get opportunity from KP voters not from Islamabad picking who is capable. If you dismiss elected government and then hand-pick capable PTI for advisory council that s not inclusion it s selection. And the claim that there was now greater room for dialogue than before following removal of party s provincial government as Ali Muhammad Khan noted shows the problem. Dialogue after removal is coercion. Real dialogue is before removal with CM in room. If you remove a government that enjoying three-fourths public support had been removed throwing country into volatile situation and then ask if fight against terrorism can be won without PTI answer is no. You need PTI cooperation and you get cooperation by keeping its government not removing it. If Pakistan is heading towards neither dictatorship nor presidential system and sham democracy is bad as Vawda himself says then governor rule where one governor rules without assembly without chief minister without cabinet approved by people is closest to sham democracy.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ