TODAY’S PAPER | November 13, 2026 | EPAPER

Naqvi defends direct rule 'as a last resort'

He says federal delegation had waited for hours while other side held consultations in separate room


Our Correspondent October 16, 2026 Less than a minute read

ISLAMABAD:

Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi on Thursday said the federal government had continued negotiations with the opposition and the K-P government until the last moment in an effort to resolve outstanding issues and avoid the imposition of emergency and governor's rule.

Speaking during the joint sitting of parliament, he urged lawmakers from both sides who had participated in the negotiations to verify the facts, saying the federal government had neither walked out of the talks nor imposed any unreasonable deadline on the other side.

Naqvi said the federal delegation had waited for hours while the other side held consultations in a separate room. He added that the government had repeatedly engaged in dialogue and made efforts to move the process forward.

Referring to a document containing the points discussed during the negotiations, the interior minister said the federal government had attempted to accommodate the other side's demands. He stressed that the negotiations had never been a matter of ego for the federal government, as it remained willing to facilitate an agreement.

COMMENTS (1)

Salman | 3 weeks ago | Reply If it was last resort we should be able to see what was tried before last. Naqvi says federal government had continued negotiations with opposition and K-P government until the last moment in effort to resolve outstanding issues and avoid imposition of emergency and governor s rule. And federal delegation had waited for hours while other side held consultations in a separate room. Waiting while other side consults is not a concession that s how negotiations work. In every talks one side goes to other room to discuss. If you waited for hours that means you had time why not wait one more day He says government had neither walked out of the talks nor imposed any unreasonable deadline. But emergency was imposed at midnight without a final agreed draft. If there was no deadline why not continue next morning Midnight notification itself is a deadline. Last moment implies you ran out of time not that you agreed. He mentions a document containing points discussed during negotiations and that federal government had attempted to accommodate other side s demands. Then publish the document. What were KP s demands Three public things consult province before operation as per KP Assembly resolution release merger funds and NFC arrears and allow jirga with Afghanistan for border peace. Which of these is unreasonable If you accommodated them which one you accepted Till now none accepted. Accommodating doesn t mean asking KP to sign that federal can launch operation anytime without consultation. That s not accommodating that s asking province to give up its constitutional right. He says it was never ego. But after failed talks you put elected Chief Minister Sohail Afridi in protective custody with cabinet members. Protective custody has no law. If it s not ego produce him in court if there is a case or let him go. Keeping him locked while saying talks were friendly doesn t add up. Last resort in Constitution is not direct rule. Last resort is NSC meeting with CM present Supreme Court advisory financial package for police. None tried. You can t say last resort when you haven t tried middle options. If lawmakers from both sides can verify let PTI participants release their version of document too. Then public can judge who waited and who walked out.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ