TODAY’S PAPER | September 10, 2026 | EPAPER

IBM, NASA launch AI model to help map ice, craters on Moon

NASA-IBM Lunar Foundation Model is a public AI tool trained on data from nine instruments on four NASA missions


Reuters September 10, 2026 1 min read
The Moon, with its Orienale basin prominent at right, is photographed by the Artemis II crew through the Orion spacecraft's window at 3:41 p.m. EDT (19:41 GMT) during their flyby of the Moon, April 6, 2026.PHOTO: REUTERS

IBM and NASA on Thursday released an open-source AI model designed to help scientists analyze decades ​of lunar observation data and support plans for ‌a sustained human presence on the Moon.

The NASA-IBM Lunar Foundation Model is a publicly available AI tool designed to study the ​Moon. It was trained on more than ​30 layers of data collected by nine instruments ⁠on four NASA missions, including the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

The ​model joins IBM and NASA's Prithvi family of open ​foundation models, which span geospatial, weather and other applications.

It can help researchers identify potential ice deposits on the Moon's permanently shadowed ​regions, map craters to select safe landing sites and ​study volcanic features — tasks that have traditionally required scientists to sift ‌through ⁠maps and images manually or rely on lower-resolution machine-learning tools.

Read More: New NASA telescope to probe dark energy, dark matter and exoplanets

In benchmark tests, the model identified key features on the lunar surface up to 23% more accurately than ​widely used ​methods, NASA and ⁠IBM said.

Lunar ice is of particular interest to space agencies because it indicates ​the presence of water and oxygen, resources ​considered essential ⁠for a future Moon base and for producing rocket fuel for missions to Mars.

ASA's Artemis program plans to ⁠return ​astronauts to the Moon in 2028, ​testing new technology for a sustained lunar presence and future Mars ​missions.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ