Rethinking student orientation in Pakistan's universities

.

Dr Asghar Zaidi is Provost, University of Management and Technology, Lahore. He can be contacted at s.m.asghar.zaidi@gmail.com. Bilal Khan is Director, Office of Participants Success, University of Management and Technology, Lahore

In the coming weeks, universities across Pakistan will welcome a new cohort of undergraduates, as they do every August and September. Banners will go up, speeches will be made, and new students will sit through presentations on grading systems, attendance rules, campus facilities and codes of conduct. All of it is well intentioned. Yet the true measure of orientation is not how much information is delivered in the first week. It is whether students leave that week believing they have joined a community where they belong, where they are valued, and where support will be available whenever they need it.

That measure invites a different question. What if this orientation is not primarily an information event at all, but the beginning of a carefully designed transition experience? The distinction may appear subtle, but it changes everything about how we design the first week, and the first semester.

Consider who is arriving. Every incoming class in Pakistan is remarkably diverse. Even at prestigious institutions such as LUMS, NUST and Habib University, outreach programmes now bring talented students from small towns and modest public sector schools to sit alongside graduates of elite city schools. Two students may have earned admission to the same programme, yet they begin from very different starting points: different academic preparation, different familiarity with English, different social confidence and different family expectations. Many are living away from home for the first time.

The move from school or college to university is among the most demanding transitions a young person makes. School rewards obedience and memorisation; university demands independence, initiative and critical thought. Too much is simply assumed: that students know how to plan their studies, manage their time, approach a professor or ask for help.

Faced with such diversity, universities respond with standardisation, and everyone receives the same information at the same time. A common core is sensible, but institutions must identify students for whom the standard route will not be enough. A first-generation student anxious about fees, or one quietly struggling with homesickness or mental health, needs customised support from day one, not after the first crisis.

Research on cognitive psychology shows that working memory has limited capacity; novelty, uncertainty and anxiety consume the very resources needed to absorb new information. Lengthy policy presentations in week one are forgotten, not because students lack interest but because they are already processing enormous change. Likewise, students who develop an early sense of belonging are far more likely to persist, and the earliest weeks set patterns of engagement that become difficult to reverse.

This is why the one-week orientation offered by most of our universities is not sufficient. Orientation should be reconceived as a semester-long transition strategy. For undergraduates committing four years of their lives, an excellent first semester lays the foundation for everything that follows. The first week should build relationships and let students discover the campus through team activities, simulations and guided exploration, with senior students as the visible face and clubs and societies present from the start; information experienced rather than merely received. The first month should add structured peer mentoring, study skills workshops and advising check-ins. Across the semester, information should be reinforced at the moment students actually need it: before course withdrawal deadlines, at fee time, ahead of first examinations.

Relationships deserve the most sustained attention of all. Students persist because of people: a senior who shows them the ropes, a teacher who knows their name, a staff member in student services whom they start to trust. Such connections cannot be manufactured in a single week; they must be deliberately cultivated across the semester, with faculty and staff mentoring the experience rather than merely delivering it.

Orientation is also the right moment to state plainly the values the institution expects, such as truthfulness, trustworthiness, humility, integrity and good manners. This is not moralising. Character, cultivated alongside competence, is what carries graduates through setbacks, earns them trust in professional life and equips them to serve society. If Pakistan is to raise a generation of character-driven leaders, that formation must begin in the very first week and be modelled, not merely announced, throughout university life.

The age of AI makes one further element essential: teaching students how to learn. AI has made answers cheap and immediate, but understanding still requires attention, struggle and practice. Orientation should introduce this reality early: that confusion is a signal of growth, that effort is the point, and that learning, done well, is deeply enjoyable. Students who learn how to learn carry that capacity far beyond graduation, into every stage of their careers and lives.

None of this is untested. Oxford and Cambridge build their welcome weeks around colleges, small communities where every new student is known by name and meets a tutor from the outset. Harvard pairs each first-year student with an adviser and a residential community. Arizona State University, admired for serving one of the most diverse intakes in America, treats the first-year experience as a university-wide responsibility, with early-alert systems and sustained advising. The common thread is not how resorceful an institution is; it is in fact the conviction that relationships and sustained early support, not information dumps, produce successful graduates.

Above all, university leaders must treat orientation as a strategic priority, because the success of their students is, in the end, their own success. This August, as the banners go up again, our universities should ask a harder question than how smoothly the first week ran: did our newest students leave it believing they belong? Everything else follows from that.

Load Next Story