Flights to Iran being considered for Shia pilgrims
Islamabad and Tehran are considering starting airline flights for pilgrims who visit holy shrines in Iran in the wake of the attack on 29 Shia pilgrims in Mastung, Balochistan, officials said.
The move came after Iran reacted to the Mastung incident by shutting down the trade gate at the Pakistan border.
A delegation headed by Qazi Asghar, representative of the Wali-e-Faqih (Religious Guardian) at Hajj and Pilgrimage Affairs department in Iran will meet parliamentarians in Islamabad on Monday. Pakistan’s Religious Affairs Minister Khurshid Shah will brief the delegation on rising security worries for pilgrims in the region. Officials from both sides are hopeful this meeting will pave the way for a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two countries modelled on the one Pakistan and India have for the security of visitors.
Officials at the Ministry of Religious Affairs told The Express Tribune that Pakistan and India signed five MoUs some years back to ensure safety of pilgrims. However, Islamabad and Tehran have no such agreement, they said.
“Airline services will restore the confidence of pilgrims,” said MNA Syed Imran, who is a member of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Religious Affairs, which will brief the Iranian delegation on Monday.
Iranian officials in Islamabad told The Express Tribune that Tehran is deeply concerned by rising ethnic violence on the border areas. The Iranian interior minister is visiting Islamabad this week to chalk out a strategy for greater security cooperation in border areas, a senior official of the Iranian Embassy said.
Meanwhile, President Asif Ali Zardari has also directed Interior Minister Rehman Malik to ensure the security of visitors travelling on routes leading to Iran in Balochistan. He also directed Malik to personally supervise the investigation into the Mastung incident.
Around 0.12 million Pakistani pilgrims visit Iran and Iraq’s holy shrines annually. These pilgrims rarely get official permits from the Foreign Office or the relevant embassies in Pakistan, according to religious affairs ministry officials.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 26th, 2011.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732350304-0/BeFunk_§_]__-(39)1732350304-0.jpg "punjab cm maryam suspends ms and staff of multan s nishtar hospital over hiv outbreak")
1732340798-0/BeFunk_§_]__-(35)1732340798-0.jpg "bushra bibi did not name saudi arabia in remarks about medina visit pti s raoof hasan")
i'm not a SHIA, but security to all pilgrims must be provided regardless of the religion/caste/race
So the air travel shall be subsidized by both the governments? Anyway this can be a short term measure if taken in reaction to Mastung massacre - in the long run our brave army must defend its roads.
But, air route will be so expensive.
Another problem apart from security is trade:
Why Pakistan not give support to baloch living along the Pak-Iran border to do legal trading instead of smuggling. Iran has well developed border gate with Pakistan, but we dont have facilities even for our own people who go for pilgrimage or who do daily trade with Iran. SAD!
It is a good move to start flights. However, it is no solution to the security problems. Airline tickets will definitely be expensive for most Pakistani Shia pilgrims. People who got killed also knew about the route being risky, still they chose embark upon the journey shows that they might have no other way i'e financially. So, Pakistani government should figure out a way to control such horrendous killings.
Pakistani people are definitely against such killings, and most Pakistanis Muslims are definitely not against the Shia minority, and proof of which is our Shia President. It might not be good example, but it show people can sow confidence on Shias in Pakistan. It is unfortunate event like countless other incidents in which Sunni masjids and Sunni people get blasted away, and the responsible are definitely and hopefully a handful people. We all together condemn it.
There are already flights available for and from Iran. What is this being done for? It is like saying "we cannot protect you so please spend more money"
nice suggestion, best and better way.
Government and Iran have to start better services for such cause.