Snubbing fierce opposition from Israel and its regional ally the United States, Abbas handed the application letter to UN chief Ban Ki-moon at 11:35 am (1535 GMT) buoyed by more than 120 nations which have already recognised a Palestinian state.
He made the request in a letter, handed to Ban in a white folder adorned with a Palestinian eagle logo.
"The American administration did everything in its power to disrupt our project, but we are going through with it despite the obstacles and the pressure because we are asking for our rights," Abbas said late Thursday.
"There are small countries in the world that have gained their freedom and independence, but we still haven't got ours," he told the Palestinian community in New York.
Ban will now pass the landmark request to the UN Security Council, but a vote on admitting the Palestinians as a full member state could take weeks, leaving time for more diplomatic wrangling.
Palestinians were seized by the historic nature of the moment, which comes more than six decades after the creation of Israel in 1948.
Across city centers in the West Bank giant television screens has been set up so residents could watch Abbas deliver his historic address to the 193 member states of the UN General Assembly.
In Ramallah, the political capital of the West Bank, many cars were flying the Palestinian flag, and posters of Abbas and his late predecessor Yasser Arafat festooned the streets.
But fearing a spurt of violence, some 22,000 Israeli police and border police were on high alert with forces deployed along the Green Line between Israel and the West Bank, in annexed east Jerusalem, and around Arab Israeli towns.
In a sign of the tensions, a Palestinian was shot dead in clashes with Israeli troops that erupted after settlers attacked a village near Nablus on the West Bank.
Besides dealing a blow to Israel's position in future peace negotiations, UN recognition of a Palestinian state could allow increased international rights, which some fear the Palestinians may use to launch legal action against Israeli military action.
Israeli officials have warned of harsh retaliatory measures if the Palestinians succeed in their bid, including a halt to funding for the Palestinian Authority. Right-wing members of the government have gone so far as to call for annexation of the West Bank.
Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were due to make almost back-to-back addresses to the UN General Assembly on Friday to set out their opposing visions of how to achieve peace in the Middle East.
Last-minute bargaining to divert the Palestinians from their course resumed Friday with a meeting of negotiators from the Middle East Quartet -- the United States, Russia, the European Union and United Nations.
Middle East envoy Tony Blair said Thursday's talks ended around 1:30 am (530 GMT), and a senior US official confirmed "quartet envoys are meeting this morning (Friday)."
They are trying to hammer out a possible statement which could bring the two sides back to direct talks which have stalled since September 2010.
The United States has vowed to veto the bid at the UN Security Council, with the Palestinians needing to win the backing of nine of the 15 council members.
If that bid fails, they may well seek to be admitted as a non-member observer state by the General Assembly.
A French suggestion that Palestine be given an intermediate status as a United Nations observer nation remained on the table, Foreign Minister Alain Juppe's spokesman said Friday despite what he said were "Israeli reservations".
US President Barack Obama insisted to the UN General Assembly on Wednesday that only new Israeli-Palestinian talks could bring lasting peace.
Israel regrets Palestine bid
Israel said on Friday it regrets that Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has handed over a request to the United Nations to admit Palestine as a full member state.
"We regret the step... The only way to Palestinian statehood is through negotiations," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's spokesman Gidi Shmerling told AFP.
"We believe that the only path to true peace is through negotiations and not unilateral steps," he added.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Palestinians have a right to be free and not under occupation forever. A secular, Palestinian state is the only solution to the oldest problem of that part of the world.
I have the solution, but people just laugh at me. Both Israelis and Palestinians should be required to give up the practice of religion. Everyone should be required to declare themselves atheists. It doesn't hurt. I've been an atheist for the past 70 years and quite happy to be religion-free.
Additionally, Israelis and Palestinians should make the 4th Sunday of June a national holiday to celebrate their LGBT citizens. If you haven't noticed, gay people are the first ones to cross borders to make love and celebrate the joys of life.
@John B:
I also watched the interview on Chalie Rose. Both side had made great presentation, especially for Palestinian spokesman, that is a first. Palestinian negotiiator came thru as an honest man pleading their case. I was sympathetic towards his plight. Israeli ambassador was very good, soft spoken and he explained the Israeli positon very well. I think Palestinians are defining their boundry on their own, which is not workable. They have to sit with Israelis and sort out the matter, this gimmick to put their boundry unilaterally is going no where.
Watched the interview of the chief Palestinian negotiator and Israel UN ambassador on the issues.
Two state solution all agree
1967 border with land swaps all agree
Sticky issues are:
Border maps have not been defined.
Right of refugees returning to Israel - Israel is objecting to it. Israel position is that Palestinian should absorb the refugees. May be a lottery?
Jerusalem capital - both of them are evasive. Mixed signals. Going to be the big sticky issue.
Israel security at the Gaza ( Hamas end) and west bank guaranteed by PLO - never heard the word Yes from PLO negotiator. So Israel insisting keeping its force which of course Palestinian object.
Above all Money for Palestine reconstruction. Israel said that Arab league are not committed in contributing any money.
Apparently these are the openly discussed issues, there may be some private sticky decisions.
In the end, without agreement on defined border, capital city and the money for Palestinian state, I wonder how a full statehood can be formed without confrontations from both sides. The recognition of south Sudan came with these sticky issue resolved, as in the case of India and Pakistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh and India and Bangladesh. My understanding is that still money issue with pakistan is outstanding from Bangladesh side.
Support Palestinian statehood. But without clarity on defined border, mutual security, and money these two states will go into perpetual confrontations.
Neither side is honestly discussing it openly. So opinions vary depending on passion.
The Palestinian negotiator said that if the security council did not approve statehood, they are not going seek UN general assembly vote and will leave it to Israel to assume the duties of palestine as occupied force, which of course is back to square one beginning from 1967.
Good luck to both of them.
Why is it that we Muslims are so tolerant and forgiving of our own brutalities, very conveniently go on blaming Israelis and American for all our woes...? No matter how hard i try to formulate objective views on the Israeli Palestinian issue the emotional surge that come with the thought of Palestinian Independence never fails to overwhelms me, marring all objectivity and resulting in a relapse where Israel appears to be the number one enemy Islam. May Palestinian find an end to their plight. Ameen.
Palastine statehood inevitable now. It's opponents can go eat pie.