Sabrina Carpenter blasts White House over “Juno” use in ICE video

Sabrina Carpenter blasts the White House for using her song “Juno” in an ICE deportation video, calling it “evil”

Sabrina Carpenter is publicly condemning the White House after her hit song “Juno” was used in a social media video promoting ICE deportations.

The clip, released by Donald Trump’s administration, used the upbeat track from her latest album to accompany footage highlighting immigration enforcement efforts.

The singer reacted quickly after fans alerted her to the post. In a direct response to the White House, Carpenter called out the administration for associating her music with what she views as a harmful message. “This video is evil and disgusting,” she wrote. “Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.”

this video is evil and disgusting. Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.

— Sabrina Carpenter (@SabrinaAnnLynn) December 2, 2025

Carpenter’s statement immediately gained traction online, with fans, activists, and fellow artists amplifying her message across platforms. Many praised her for distancing herself from political messaging she did not authorize, while others expressed concern about how government accounts can repurpose popular music without artists’ approval.

This is not the first time Carpenter has spoken out politically. When Trump was elected last November, she addressed her concert audience, encouraging fans to stay informed and engaged. Her latest response continues that pattern of using her platform to clarify her stance on social and political issues.

The situation has also reignited conversation about which public figures in Hollywood support the Trump administration and which have publicly rejected it. Carpenter’s firm statement places her among the many mainstream artists pushing back against unauthorized political use of their work.

As of now, the White House has not issued a response or removed the video, and it remains unclear whether Carpenter or her team will pursue further action. The incident highlights the ongoing tension between artists, copyright use, and political messaging in the digital era.