Conspiracy theorists, amateur sleuths, and online provocateurs erupted with frustration and disbelief when the highly anticipated release of documents related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein failed to deliver any groundbreaking revelations.
Even Elon Musk was waiting along with us!
These files, heavily hyped by the Trump administration, were supposed to expose the dark secrets surrounding Epstein’s illicit activities, but they contained nothing more than previously available information—flight logs and a contact list that has been public for years.
The fallout has been nothing short of a meltdown among those who believed that these documents would finally deliver names that would “take down the deep state,” or at the very least, provide some indication of prominent figures involved in Epstein’s network.
For years, followers of conspiracy theories like QAnon have demanded a list of supposed clients linked to Epstein’s alleged child trafficking operation, fantasizing about public figures from the political and celebrity world being exposed.
But as many had warned, such a list has yet to materialize. Despite this, the demand persisted, growing with each passing year as frustrations built up within the MAGA base.
In a move that seemed almost designed to stoke these very flames, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and the White House ramped up expectations, teasing the release of what they promised would be explosive files shedding new light on Epstein’s activities.
Bondi even appeared on Fox News to hype the contents, calling the files “pretty sick” and promising that they would reveal “a lot of information.”
As the documents hit the public sphere on Thursday, they quickly became a source of mockery and outrage.
What had been promised as the ultimate disclosure turned out to be nothing more than redacted flight logs and contact pages from Epstein’s infamous little black book, which had already been available since 2015.
The contacts included names like Trump, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz—figures who have long been tied to Epstein’s social circle.
These logs simply documented the movement of Epstein’s private jet, traveling between his properties, including the notorious island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint James.
Julie K. Brown, an investigative journalist who has closely covered the Epstein case for years, highlighted the absurdity of the situation by pointing out that the “little black book” is available for purchase on Amazon. It includes many of the same names that the conspiracy theorists were hoping to see revealed.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, chairwoman of the House Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, voiced her anger on X, writing, “I nor the task force were given or reviewed the Epstein documents being released today,” and lamenting that the release amounted to little more than “Epstein’s phonebook. THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!”
Laura Loomer, a far-right activist, expressed her disbelief at the files, calling them “props” and accusing influencers who were given the documents of participating in a “deception to run cover for pedophiles.”
Loomer’s frustration was echoed by many other far-right figures who had anticipated a major revelation, only to find themselves with a batch of documents they’d already seen before.
Even influencers who were initially hopeful tried to spin the release as meaningful, but the response was overwhelmingly negative.
Chaya Raichik, the woman behind the influential “Libs of TikTok” account, worked with Loomer to scan and upload the documents to a file-sharing site. Meanwhile, the Justice Department’s decision to release the documents in bound folders that were given to right-wing influencers only seemed to raise more questions about transparency and intent.
One of the most telling reactions came from the far-right X account “End Wokeness,” which posted a picture of a skeleton sitting at a laptop with the caption “Waiting for Epstein clients to face justice.”
The disillusionment was palpable, as these followers realized that their hopes of exposing a high-profile “Epstein client list” were dashed once again.
Even in the face of overwhelming disappointment, the narrative of a cover-up persisted. Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee framed the situation as a deliberate withholding of crucial documents, suggesting that certain FBI agents might be intentionally destroying records. He proposed the "Preventing Epstein Documentation Obliteration Act" to ensure that the files are protected in the future.
In an attempt to downplay the growing frustration, the House Judiciary Committee's official account tried to make light of the situation with an X post that linked to Rick Astley’s “Never Gonna Give You Up” music video, a reference to the “Rickrolling” internet prank. The move was widely criticized for treating the Epstein case with irreverence while dismissing the serious nature of the investigation.
Nothing like the Judiciary Committee making light of sex trafficking....
It seems that the latest “Epstein Files” release has become yet another installment in a long-running saga of unfulfilled expectations.
Despite the dramatic promises, what was revealed only fueled more conspiracy theories and accusations of a cover-up, leaving many wondering if the real truth will ever come to light.
As the Trump administration and its supporters double down on the notion of a hidden deep state conspiracy, it looks like the search for new revelations surrounding Epstein’s network will continue for the foreseeable future.
For now, those demanding accountability from the powerful figures tied to Epstein will have to wait—and hope that one day, the information they crave is finally released.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ