Apex court approves Canal Road expansion project

Court approves the expansion on a condition of planting four saplings for every tree cut in the construction work.


Express September 15, 2011

LAHORE: The Supreme Court (SC) of Pakistan has given a conditional green signal to the Canal Road expansion project, Express 24/7 reported Thursday.

A two-member bench of the court comprising Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Justice Mian Saqib Nisar had earlier reserved the judgment of the case on August 15.

In the court’s proceedings today, the expansion of the project was given a go-ahead on the condition that four saplings will be planted for every tree cut during the construction work.

Earlier conservationists and government officials did not seem to be satisfied with the project due to the reason that it required the felling of dozens of trees.

In this regard, SC had set up a mediation committee which was headed by Lawyer Parvez Hassan.

The Lahore Bachao Tehreek (LBT) had challenged the Punjab government’s decision of the expansion of Canal Road.

COMMENTS (5)

Mudassar.R | 12 years ago | Reply

I would only say , trees saves lives ,,,they are for humans...humans are not for trees....millions of hours have been wasted on that canal road if aggregated for all people who have stuck on that road till today,,,common ,let them expand the road....max you can advice them to plant x number of plants, examine them after one year and go ahead,,,,is it so hard? is it some extremely complex mathematical equation which these plant lovers and judges cannot solve,,,and if it is so hard for them,,,they dont deserve to be where they are.... let us live

I really hope ET you will not get anything in this comment,,,coz you are stoping all of mine

Sajjad Ashraf | 12 years ago | Reply

We need to plant for centuries rather than the short quick fixes we have become used to...

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ