Unjust scrutiny of Pakistan's nuclear programme

The recent US imposition of sanctions on Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC) and three commercial entities (Affiliates International, Akhtar & Sons Pvt Ltd, and Rockside Enterprises) is an unfortunate and biased move.

Such actions not only undermine Pakistan's efforts to maintain regional stability but also distract from more pressing global issues, such as the fight against terrorism emanating from Afghanistan, often with tacit support from India, a strategic ally of the US.

The sanctions come with absurd allegations, including a claim by Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer, that Pakistan could use its missiles to attack the US. Such a suggestion defies logic and demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of Pakistan's defensive doctrine.

Pakistan has consistently maintained that its nuclear capabilities are purely for deterrence, not aggression. Unlike India, which actively seeks regional dominance through nuclear expansion, Pakistan's policy of minimum credible deterrence serves as a stabilising factor in South Asia.

Comparisons with other regional nuclear states further highlight the discriminatory nature of these sanctions. India, for instance, has faced documented instances of nuclear material theft and unauthorised diversions, raising global security concerns.

Yet, it continues to escape similar scrutiny from the US and its allies. This selective accountability exposes a clear bias and undermines the credibility of non-proliferation efforts.

Pakistan's nuclear programme adheres to the highest standards of safety and security, as repeatedly acknowledged by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Robust systems and measures ensure that Pakistan's nuclear assets remain safeguarded against unauthorised use or threats. Unlike speculative narratives, there has never been a documented breach of Pakistan's nuclear security protocols.

Independent assessments rank Pakistan's nuclear safeguards among the best globally, surpassing many nuclear-armed states, including India. The Strategic Plans Division (SPD) oversees Pakistan's nuclear programme with unmatched efficiency and precision, ensuring strict compliance with international standards.

India's nuclear ambitions pose a far greater threat to regional stability, yet the US has turned a blind eye. By rejecting the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) and expanding its nuclear arsenal, India undermines global non-proliferation efforts. In contrast, Pakistan has consistently offered to join international non-proliferation regimes under equitable and non-discriminatory conditions.

Furthermore, while Pakistan's nuclear initiatives focus on deterrence and peaceful applications, India's aggressive posture and hegemonic aspirations fuel regional tensions. The tacit US approval of India's actions only emboldens New Delhi, creating a precarious imbalance in South Asia.

The US and its allies have long opposed Pakistan's nuclear programme, viewing it through a lens of suspicion and hostility. This opposition often stems from Pakistan's refusal to accept a subordinate role in regional geopolitics, unlike India, which aligns itself with Western interests. By imposing sanctions, the US aims to curtail Pakistan's strategic capabilities, ignoring the legitimate security concerns that necessitate its nuclear deterrence.

Pakistan's nuclear programme emerged as a response to India's nuclear tests in the 1970s. It has since played a vital role in maintaining a balance of power in South Asia. However, the West's narrative continues to portray Pakistan as a threat, despite its demonstrable commitment to responsible nuclear practices.

Instead of perpetuating unfounded accusations against Pakistan, the US would do well to focus on addressing the scourge of terrorism emanating from Afghanistan. The destabilising role of India, a US ally, in supporting proxy networks against Pakistan cannot be ignored. By shifting its focus to counterterrorism cooperation, the US can contribute to regional stability and global security.

Pakistan has consistently played a crucial role in combating terrorism, often at great cost to its own stability and development. Yet, instead of supporting Pakistan's efforts, the US chooses to undermine its strategic capabilities, further complicating the security landscape in South Asia.

Contrary to the narrative perpetuated by the US and its allies, Pakistan's nuclear programme has made significant contributions to energy generation, socioeconomic development and peaceful applications. Nuclear technology supports advancements in agriculture, medicine and industry, improving the lives of millions.

Comprehensive legal and institutional frameworks regulate Pakistan's nuclear programme, ensuring transparency and accountability. The IAEA has consistently praised Pakistan for fulfilling its international nuclear obligations, further affirming its status as a responsible nuclear state.

The US must adopt a balanced approach towards South Asia, recognising Pakistan's legitimate security concerns and contributions to global peace. Targeting Pakistan's nuclear programme, while ignoring India's destabilising actions, only exacerbates regional tensions and undermines global non-proliferation efforts.

Sanctions on Pakistan's NDC and affiliated entities are not only unjust but also counterproductive. They distract from addressing genuine security threats and fail to acknowledge Pakistan's exemplary track record as a responsible nuclear state. By fostering cooperation instead of confrontation, the US can help build a more stable and secure South Asia.

The path forward lies in mutual respect, equitable treatment and a shared commitment to global peace and security. Pakistan's nuclear programme is not a threat; it is a stabilising force in a volatile region, deserving of recognition, not condemnation.