Lily Allen reveals OnlyFans foot photos earn more than Spotify royalties

Lily Allen says her OnlyFans foot photos are more profitable than Spotify royalties.


Pop Culture & Art October 26, 2024
Courtesy: @lilyallen on Instagram

Singer Lily Allen disclosed that her OnlyFans foot photos generate more income than her streaming royalties from Spotify, where she has approximately 7.4 million monthly listeners.

The 39-year-old artist posted on X (formerly Twitter) on October 25, addressing the financial disparity between her music and her OnlyFans earnings. Responding to a comment criticizing her OnlyFans venture, Allen retorted, “Imagine being an artist and having nearly 8 million monthly listeners on Spotify but earning more money from having 1000 people subscribe to pictures of your feet. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.”

According to Billboard's royalty calculator, Allen’s estimated Spotify revenue of $122,321 per month is split among songwriters, producers, and her record label. In contrast, her OnlyFans page, priced at $10 per month with around 1,000 subscribers, reportedly yields $100,000 monthly, a figure she retains fully.

Allen discussed her OnlyFans decision during her BBC podcast Miss Me? with co-host Miquita Oliver, noting her five-star rating on WikiFeet and the suggestion by a nail technician to consider foot content on OnlyFans. When asked about her husband David Harbour’s response to her OnlyFans activity, Allen shared in a July 4 podcast episode that he was initially curious but supportive, commenting, “He thinks it’s great… he was like, ‘Is this a kink for you?’… maybe there’s something in the power element that’s slightly kinky for me.”

Allen maintains clear boundaries with her content, stating, “I’ve got very strict guidelines… only feet, only feet.” She emphasized that while requests vary, she remains committed to exclusive foot content, a decision that has proven financially rewarding.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ