Harris warns dire consequences for Ukraine if Trump wins presidency

She asserts "Vladimir Putin will be sitting in Kyiv if Donald Trump were president"


News Desk October 22, 2024

In a recent campaign rally in Wisconsin, US Vice President Kamala Harris cautioned that if Donald Trump were to reclaim the presidency, it could have severe implications for global stability and security; particularly the Ukraine-Russian war.

She asserted, "Vladimir Putin would be sitting in Kyiv if Donald Trump were president," suggesting that Trump's approach to foreign policy might embolden the Russian leader's aggression towards Ukraine.

Harris emphasized her concerns about Trump's unpredictability and his tendency to be swayed by flattery, referencing his past actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, where he allegedly sent tests to Putin.

She criticized Trump's comments about quickly resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict, stating, "We as Americans think that the president of the United States should solve an issue like that through surrender," implying that Trump’s rhetoric could lead to a detrimental outcome for Ukraine.

During the rally, Harris highlighted that the upcoming November 5 presidential election is being closely monitored by US allies, indicating that Trump's potential return to power could undermine American credibility on the world stage.

She reiterated her belief that Trump's victory could jeopardize Ukraine's fight against Russian aggression.

On the other side, Trump recently met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, asserting his capability to end the conflict with a "fair deal" that considers both sides' interests.

He expressed confidence in his relationship with both Zelenskyy and Putin, stating, "It takes two to tango, and we will."

Trump emphasized the need for resolution, noting the hardships faced by Ukraine due to the war, and promised to engage both parties to negotiate an end to the conflict.

In a twist, Trump reiterated his claim that he was wrongfully impeached over a phone call with Zelenskyy in 2019, where he allegedly pressured the Ukrainian leader to investigate the Biden family.

He insisted that Zelenskyy had cleared him of wrongdoing, dismissing the impeachment as a "hoax."

Zelenskyy, while affirming the importance of US support, expressed his hope for continued strong relations post-election, recognizing the significant impact the US presidential race has on Ukraine's future.

He acknowledged the complexities of the situation, stressing that compromises should not come at Ukraine's expense.

The backdrop of this political discourse is an ongoing debate within the US about the extent of support for Ukraine.

Trump's stance diverges sharply from that of the Biden administration, which recently announced a $7.9 billion new military aid package for Ukraine.

Previously on October 17, Trump attributed the initiation of the war in Ukraine to President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, indicating that he may reduce US support for Ukraine if he wins the upcoming November 5 election.

The former Republican president has consistently criticized Zelenskiy during his campaign, referring to him as "the greatest salesman on Earth" for successfully soliciting and securing billions in US military aid since the conflict began in 2022.

Trump's running mate, JD Vance, has also expressed skepticism about continued funding, which has led to friction within Republican ranks regarding the approach to Ukraine.

As the election approaches, the stakes are high for both candidates.

Harris’s warnings about the repercussions of a Trump presidency and Trump's promises to negotiate an end to the war highlight the stark differences in their foreign policy philosophies and their potential ramifications for Ukraine and global security.

The outcome of the election may not only redefine US domestic politics but also significantly impact the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and its broader geopolitical implications.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ