The Court had been requested by a lawyer on behalf of the Baloch Ittehad Tehreek to call in the army to control the law and order situation in Karachi. The answer he got was an indirect reference to the Supreme Court’s verdict against a military takeover through martial law by General Musharraf in 2007. This verdict overrode the earlier verdict that had endorsed the takeover by General Musharraf in 1999. If the politicians have forgotten that legal milestone, the Supreme Court has not; or cannot. General Musharraf’s overthrow of the PML-N government was acclaimed by the opposition politicians and thereafter a civilian-military mix of governance ruled over the country. The Kargil misadventure, carried out by an army chief without the complete consent of a prime minister ruling with a two-thirds majority in parliament, was forgotten. The Supreme Court, earlier attacked by the same government, had gone along with Musharraf’s rule. In 2007, when Musharraf tried to bend the Supreme Court to his will, the civil society of Pakistan joined the lawyers’ community to foil him. If this is the jurisprudence against military takeovers, why are all politicians, from the MQM to the ANP, calling on the army to ‘do something’? For its part, following a recent corps commanders’ meeting, the army expressed its dissatisfaction over Karachi but it has no stomach for a takeover. And that is good because if it makes any mistakes, they will be related to its unwise policy of pronouncing on populist non-military causes. The military should abide by its constitutional mandate of guarding the frontiers of the country and, in the current situation of fighting terrorists, and let politicians clean up the mess that they have created themselves. That is the only way through which the latter will mature and the country’s institutions grow. Thankfully, the one political party with clout inside the army, the PML-N, has manfully resisted the temptation this time around. Its leader, Nawaz Sharif, would rather see the PPP government’s tenure completed than see it curtailed courtesy an army intervention. The army has little cause to topple the PPP government because the government is adhering to its unrealistic diktat on foreign policy. Whatever is the cause of the army’s abstention in 2011, it is good for Pakistan and certainly good for its nascent democracy. The military has reversed some of the practices of Musharraf in its new approach to issues. It disagreed with his policy of first taking over in anger over the civilian government’s efforts to normalise relations with India, but then proceeded to do the same thing. It has revived ‘strategic depth’ and is in the process of pulling out of the American orbit of global power. It cannot jeopardise this project by fighting terrorists in Karachi, a fight that it is not trained for.
The army can’t pull off something that the civilians can’t. Because of its supremacy and its frequent takeovers, civilian and constitutional institutions have become weak. And the reason behind the malfunction of democracy lies in precisely this. The current army chief, knowing this, has discontinued some past practices. Musharraf had placed more than 1,000 active and retired officers in various ministries, such as education, transportation, railways, sports and culture, as well as in semi-autonomous institutions such as the National Highways Authority and the Water and Power Development Authority. This ended up weakening the institutions and corrupting the inductees. The military is right in staying away from the political morass in Karachi. It must fight al Qaeda and the Taliban and do its utmost to prevent terrorism in Pakistan from spilling into China. Its earlier spilling into America and Europe has not benefited Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 10th, 2011.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
In karachi all the mess is due to mindset of one party lead by a foreigner. Army s take over of the city may b disasterous. Instead judiciary,police,rangers, civil society and media can handle this mess they just need to be bold with some improvement in the system.
With all due respect to Mr Editor,Karachi is no more a political issue,when you are left with more then 1600 dead bodies in a year it cant be called a political mess.If Sufi Muhammads speech was not a political mess ,If Swat needed Militry operation why not Karachi,If public lashing of a girl was labbeled as terrorism ,why Bori Band dead bodies in karachi is called a political mess,If kidnaping by so-called taliban is called extremism and terrorism why Bhata in karachi is called a political mess,If a two hour speech by Sufi Muhammad against the State consitution can earn Swat a full scale Militry operation ,why not the brutality and extreme killings in Karachi cant be stopped through militry operation...hypocracy at its best keep it up