Tim Walz’s old DUI mugshot goes viral following VP nomination

Walz’s 1995 DUI mugshot grabs attention after Kamala Harris picks the Minnesota Governor as her running mate.


Pop Culture & Art August 06, 2024
-AFP

Tim Walz's old DUI mugshot has resurfaced and gone viral following his selection as Kamala Harris' vice-presidential running mate. 

The image, from a 1995 arrest in Nebraska, is now circulating on X, formerly known as Twitter, drawing attention from both supporters and critics.

According to the Daily Mail, Walz was arrested nearly three decades ago for driving 96 mph in a 55-mph zone. At the time, he was a newlywed teacher and serving in the Army National Guard. He was initially charged with driving under the influence and speeding. However, Walz reached a plea agreement that resulted in the charges being reduced to reckless driving.

His campaign manager claimed that Walz's partial deafness contributed to a misunderstanding during the arrest, arguing that his hearing issues affected his ability to follow the officer's instructions. This defence resurfaced during Walz's 2006 congressional campaign, where it was explained that his hearing impairment had since been surgically corrected, the Daily Mail reports.

Despite failing both a field sobriety test and a breath test, the blood test results were suppressed in court, possibly due to the officer not recognising Walz's hearing impairment at the time. The police report noted a "strong odour of alcoholic beverage" on Walz's breath, and his blood alcohol concentration was recorded at .128, above the legal limit.

The incident has re-emerged amid Walz's rise in national politics but has not overshadowed his career. Known for his progressive policies, Walz has been praised for his leadership in Minnesota, where he has focused on education and healthcare reforms. He has also openly discussed his decision to stop drinking alcohol following the Nebraska arrest.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ