India removes decades-old ban on far-right Hindu group membership for officials

Government memo reveals that civil servants can now join RSS, lifting a ban in place since 1966.


AFP July 22, 2024
Activists from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu hardline group, hold bamboo sticks as they take part in a march in Bhopal February 23, 2014. PHOTO: REUTERS

India has lifted a decades-old ban on civil servants being members of a far-right Hindu nationalist group that is the ideological parent of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling party, according to a government memo made public on Monday.

Several top leaders of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), including the PM himself, cut their teeth at the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), whose millions of members conduct paramilitary drills and prayer meetings.

The organisation campaigns for India to be declared a Hindu nation -- rather than a secular one, as enshrined in its constitution -- and critics accuse it of fomenting sectarian divisions.

Since 1966, Indian civil service rules have banned government employees from membership or participation in the activities of the RSS and the Islamist organisation Jamaat-e-Islami.

But a new official memorandum issued earlier this month and made public on Monday by BJP publicity chief Amit Malviya stated: "It has been decided to remove the mention" of RSS from the rule.

In a post on X, Malviya said the rule was an "unconstitutional order issued 58 years ago".

The government memorandum did not mention Jamaat-e-Islami.

Opposition leaders lashed out at the amendment.

Jairam Ramesh of the Congress party said "the bureaucracy can now come in knickers" -- a reference to the khaki shorts that RSS members wore as part of their uniform until recently.

The RSS has briefly been declared an illegal group on three separate occasions, including after the assassination of independence hero Mahatma Gandhi by a former member.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ