West Indies thrash Uganda by 134 runs at T20 World Cup

Captain Rovman Powell emphasizes the team's aim to improve by 10 to 15% in each game


AFP/REUTERS June 09, 2024

GEORGETOWN:

Uganda equalled the lowest score ever recorded at a Twenty20 World Cup on Saturday when they tumbled to 39 all out against the West Indies at the Providence Stadium.

The Netherlands also scored 39 against Sri Lanka in 2014.

West Indies, who reached 173 for five after winning the toss and electing to bat thrashed Uganda by 134 runs , the second largest margin in T20 World Cup history.

West Indies, playing their final game in Guyana before flying to Trinidad where they meet New Zealand next Wednesday, also struggled to time the ball on another low, slow pitch.

Opener Johnson Charles top scored with 44 from 42 balls hitting one mighty six and captain Rovman Powell hit another on to the top of the grand stand in his innings of 22.

However, it was once again the powerful Andre Russell (30 not out) who accelerated the scoring rate by slashing four boundaries in the final over.

West Indies bowler Akeal Hosein finished with figures of five wickets for 11 runs off four overs as the hosts romped to victory.

Russell bowled Robinson Obuya for six and Alzarri Joseph picked up a couple from his three overs while Juma Miyagi was the only batsman to reach double figures, scoring 13 from 20 deliveries.

Left-arm spinner Hosein took five for 11 from his four overs after opening the bowling.

"I think I needed this," said Hosein after accepting the man-of-the-match award.

"In the nets and in the previous series I felt the ball was coming out good but I was just not getting the rewards."

Powell paid tribute to Hosein and said his team were looking to improve by 10 to 15% in each of their games.

"Last game we were flat so we just wanted to improve as a team," he said. "When you are playing at home the pressure can sometimes get to you."

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ