India’s Supreme Court scraps Electoral Bonds in setback to Modi’s BJP

Individuals and companies bought $1.99b of Electoral Bonds in total up to November 2023


Reuters February 15, 2024
Illuminated Supreme Court building is pictured from the International Media Center in New Delhi, India, September 9, 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS

NEW DELHI:

India's Supreme Court on Thursday scrapped a seven-year-old election funding system that allows individuals and companies to make unlimited and anonymous donations to political parties, calling it "unconstitutional".

The decision is seen as a setback for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, which has been the largest beneficiary of the system it introduced in 2017.

The system, called Electoral Bonds, was challenged by members of the opposition and a civil society group on the grounds that it hindered the public's right to know who had given money to political parties.

Under the system, a person or company could buy bonds from the state-run State Bank of India (SBI.NS), opens new tab and donate them to a political party.

Individuals and companies bought 165.18 billion rupees ($1.99 billion) of such bonds in total up to November 2023, according to the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), a non-government civil society group working on election funding in India. The group was a petitioner challenging the system.

PHOTO: REUTERS

PHOTO: REUTERS

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud said: "Political contributions give a seat at the table to the contributor ... this access also translates into influence over policy making."

In making its ruling, it said: "The scheme has been declared unconstitutional, the issuance of fresh bonds is prohibited."

BJP spokesperson Gopal Krishna Agarwal said the party was "committed to continuous reforms on electoral funding" and would abide by the ruling.

Individuals could donate any amount of cash. Companies had been restricted based on their revenue and profits, but the bond system removed those limits.

Read also: Indian opposition's challenge to Modi falters

The Supreme Court reinstated corporate donation limits.

"The ability of a company to influence the electoral process through political contributions is much higher when compared to that of an individual ... contributions made by companies are purely business transactions made with the intent of securing benefits in return," the court wrote.

The court directed SBI to not issue any more such bonds, to furnish identity details of those who had bought them, and to provide information about bonds redeemed by each political party.

Modi's government had defended the policy, saying it mitigated the use of cash in political funding by allowing donors a confidential channel to contribute to any party's funds.

Of the 120.1 billion rupees' worth of bonds sold up to the end of the fiscal year in March 2023 since they were introduced, BJP had received more than half, worth 65.66 billion rupees.

COMMENTS (4)

SAMIR SARDANA | 8 months ago | Reply THE EB SCHEME PROVES THAT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRATS AND NETAS CAN PASS LAWS WHICH NOT ONLY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION BUT ARE AGAINST BASIC CANONS OF MORALITY AND ETHICS AND PROMOTE MONEY LAUNDERING AND CORRUPTION.IN OTHER WORDS THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURE IS CORRUPTED AND HAS A PRICE AND COUNTS FOR NOTHING AS DECISIONS ARE MADE BY A FEW and every one in the Indian State has a price CASE 1 A NON-TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 120 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 100 CRORES DULY AUDITED. PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES WHICH IS NOW A TAX ASSESSED LOSS PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 15 PER ANNUM AS FEES DONATIONS RENTS ADVERTISEMENTS ETC. AND OFFSET THE INCOME WITH THE TAX LOSS OF DONATION PAID IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 2 A TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES DULY AUDITED. PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 35 PER ANNUM AS DONATIONS FOR GYANVAPI TEMPLE AS THE TRUST IS A TEMPLE OR WILL BOOK CASH DONATIONS RECEIVED TO PROPAGATE HINDOO EVIL FILTH IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 3 A TRUST BUYS ELECTORAL BEARER BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES FROM A PERSON S AT A 102 CRORES. SO THE TRUST IS OUT OF THE KYC TRAP OF SBI AND SBI HAS NO RECORD OF THE BOND THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES DULY AUDITED. THE TRUST TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 18 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST VIA AS MANY WAYS AS IT FEELS OR THE TRUST WILL DO ENTRIES OF INCOME WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS RENTS ETC FROM PARTY D OF SAY 100 CRORES AND THE TRUST WILL BE PAID A 10 PREMIUM AS THE TRUST IS TAKING IN INCOME WHICH IT WILL OFFSET WITH THE DONATION TAX LOSS AND D WIL CLAIM A 30 TAX SET OFF ON THE RENT SO BOOKED OR THE TRUST WILL DO ENTRIES OF INCOME WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS DONATIONS RECEIVED ETC FROM PARTY D OF SAY 10 CRORES AND THE TRUST WILL PAY D A 3-5 PREMIUM IN CASH WHICH IS PAID FROM THE CASH PAID BY ZEE ABOVE.THE PERSON D WILL GET A TAX OFFSET ON THE DONATION PAID IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 4 THE TRUST IN CASE 1 TO 3 CANNOT JUSTIFY A DONATION OF 100 CRORES TO PARTY X SO COMPANY Y BUYS THE BEARER BONDS OF 100 CRORES FOR 102 CRORES by cheque TRUST HAS A HAPPY PROFIT OF RS 2 CRORES in the books COMPANY Y HAS EVADED THE SBI KYC AND THE CHAIN FROM COMPANY Y TO THE ULTIMATE POLITICAL PARTY IS UNKNOWN CASE 5 COMPANY A HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 20 CRORES IT TAKES A LOAN OF 100 CRORES FROM COMPANY T AND BUYS THE EB AND THEN GIVES IT TO T COMPANY A NOW HAS A NEGATIVE EQUITY OF RS 80 CRORES PLUS INTEREST ON LOAN FROM T TRANSACTION HAPPENED IN 2017 AND IN 3 MONTHS THE COMPANY A IS LIQUIDATED AND ALL THE DIRECTORS ARE DEAD AS THEY WERE TERMINAL ZOMBIES.COMPANY A WAS FORMED 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE EB PURCHASE TERMINAL ZOMBIES ARE DIRECTORS HIRED WITH A EXPIRY LIFE OF 2-3 MONTHS ON WHOM KEYMAN POLICIES ARE ALSO TAKEN OR IN 2018 COMPANY T ACQUIRES A AND OFFSETS THE DONATION LOSS WITH ITS BOOKS AND NOW HAS A TAX ASSESSED LOSS OF SAY 100 CRORES. FROM 2018 TO 2024 JANUARY THE COMPANY T HAS TAKEN INCOME ENTRIES OF RS 100 CRORES AND HAS CHARGED A SERVICE FEES OF 10 OR RS 10 CRORES BY APRIL 2024 COMPANY T WILL BE LIQUIDATED AND ALL PAPER RECORDS WILL DISAPPEAR OR SET ON FIRE AND BY JUNE 2024 ALL THE DIRECTORS WILL BE DEAD AS THEY WERE ALSO TERMINAL ZOMBIES CASE 6 CASE 1 AND 2 WILL ALSO APPLY TO INDIAN COMPANIES. NO FOREIGN COMPANY OR FOREIGN INCORPORATED ENTITY WILL BE FOOLISH TO REGISTER WITH SBI CASE 7 IN ALL THE CASES 1 TO 6 AFTER THE ORIGINAL EB BUYER SELLS THE BOND IN CASH TO PERSON SAY ZEE THERE IS A CHAIN OF BOND TRADERS AND TRANSPORTERS IN CASH WHO ROTATE CASH FROM BLACK MONEY DRUGS ETC FOR A FEE AND DELIVER IT AT DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHIES OF POLITICAL PARTIES SO THAT BOND REDEMPTION REQUESTS ARE NOT BUNCHED AT A GEOGRAPHY ALL THE PLAYERS IN THE ABOVE CASES ARE BANIAS WHO I BELIEBVE SHOULD BE XTERMINATED dindooohindoo IN THE SELECTED WORKS OF AMBEDKAR WHICH IS ON THE MEA PORTAL AMBEDKAR DESCRIBES BANIAS AS UNDER The Bania is the worst parasitic class known to history. In him the vice of money-making is unredeemed by culture or conscience. He is like an undertaker who prospers when there is an epidemic. The only difference between the undertaker and the Bania is that the undertaker does not create an epidemic while the Bania does. He does not use his money for productive purposes. He uses it to create poverty and more poverty by lending money for unproductive purposes. INDIA IS BEING RUN BY BY BANIAS AS OF TODAY WHO CLAIM TO REPRESENT HINDOO PRIDE Ambedkar in his historic speech in Nagpur on October 15 1956 a day after he had embraced Buddhism said Even though I was born in the Hindu religion I will not die in the Hindu religion. This oath I made earlier yesterday I proved it true. I am happy I am ecstatic I have left hell this is how I feel. I do not want any blind follower
SAMIR SARDANA | 8 months ago | Reply THE EB SCHEME PROVES THAT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRATS AND NETAS CAN PASS LAWS WHICH NOT ONLY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION BUT ARE AGAINST BASIC CANONS OF MORALITY AND ETHICS AND PROMOTE MONEY LAUNDERING AND CORRUPTION.IN OTHER WORDS THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURE IS CORRUPTED AND HAS A PRICE AND COUNTS FOR NOTHING AS DECISIONS ARE MADE BY A FEW and every one in the Indian State has a price CASE 1 A NON-TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 120 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 100 CRORES DULY AUDITED. PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES WHICH IS NOW A TAX ASSESSED LOSS PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 15 PER ANNUM AS FEES DONATIONS RENTS ADVERTISEMENTS ETC. AND OFFSET THE INCOME WITH THE TAX LOSS OF DONATION PAID IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 2 A TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES DULY AUDITED. PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 35 PER ANNUM AS DONATIONS FOR GYANVAPI TEMPLE AS THE TRUST IS A TEMPLE OR WILL BOOK CASH DONATIONS RECEIVED TO PROPAGATE HINDOO EVIL FILTH IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 3 A TRUST BUYS ELECTORAL BEARER BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES FROM A PERSON S AT A 102 CRORES. SO THE TRUST IS OUT OF THE KYC TRAP OF SBI AND SBI HAS NO RECORD OF THE BOND THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES DULY AUDITED. THE TRUST TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X PERSON ZEE PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 18 CRORES BOOKED A DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER DRUG DEALER PIMP ARMS DEALER ETC. THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST VIA AS MANY WAYS AS IT FEELS OR THE TRUST WILL DO ENTRIES OF INCOME WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS RENTS ETC FROM PARTY D OF SAY 100 CRORES AND THE TRUST WILL BE PAID A 10 PREMIUM AS THE TRUST IS TAKING IN INCOME WHICH IT WILL OFFSET WITH THE DONATION TAX LOSS AND D WIL CLAIM A 30 TAX SET OFF ON THE RENT SO BOOKED OR THE TRUST WILL DO ENTRIES OF INCOME WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS DONATIONS RECEIVED ETC FROM PARTY D OF SAY 10 CRORES AND THE TRUST WILL PAY D A 3-5 PREMIUM IN CASH WHICH IS PAID FROM THE CASH PAID BY ZEE ABOVE.THE PERSON D WILL GET A TAX OFFSET ON THE DONATION PAID IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST CASE 4 THE TRUST IN CASE 1 TO 3 CANNOT JUSTIFY A DONATION OF 100 CRORES TO PARTY X SO COMPANY Y BUYS THE BEARER BONDS OF 100 CRORES FOR 102 CRORES by cheque TRUST HAS A HAPPY PROFIT OF RS 2 CRORES in the books COMPANY Y HAS EVADED THE SBI KYC AND THE CHAIN FROM COMPANY Y TO THE ULTIMATE POLITICAL PARTY IS UNKNOWN CASE 5 COMPANY A HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 20 CRORES IT TAKES A LOAN OF 100 CRORES FROM COMPANY T AND BUYS THE EB AND THEN GIVES IT TO T COMPANY A NOW HAS A NEGATIVE EQUITY OF RS 80 CRORES PLUS INTEREST ON LOAN FROM T TRANSACTION HAPPENED IN 2017 AND IN 3 MONTHS THE COMPANY A IS LIQUIDATED AND ALL THE DIRECTORS ARE DEAD AS THEY WERE TERMINAL ZOMBIES.COMPANY A WAS FORMED 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE EB PURCHASE TERMINAL ZOMBIES ARE DIRECTORS HIRED WITH A EXPIRY LIFE OF 2-3 MONTHS ON WHOM KEYMAN POLICIES ARE ALSO TAKEN OR IN 2018 COMPANY T ACQUIRES A AND OFFSETS THE DONATION LOSS WITH ITS BOOKS AND NOW HAS A TAX ASSESSED LOSS OF SAY 100 CRORES. FROM 2018 TO 2024 JANUARY THE COMPANY T HAS TAKEN INCOME ENTRIES OF RS 100 CRORES AND HAS CHARGED A SERVICE FEES OF 10 OR RS 10 CRORES BY APRIL 2024 COMPANY T WILL BE LIQUIDATED AND ALL PAPER RECORDS WILL DISAPPEAR OR SET ON FIRE AND BY JUNE 2024 ALL THE DIRECTORS WILL BE DEAD AS THEY WERE ALSO TERMINAL ZOMBIES CASE 6 CASE 1 AND 2 WILL ALSO APPLY TO INDIAN COMPANIES. NO FOREIGN COMPANY OR FOREIGN INCORPORATED ENTITY WILL BE FOOLISH TO REGISTER WITH SBI CASE 7 IN ALL THE CASES 1 TO 6 AFTER THE ORIGINAL EB BUYER SELLS THE BOND IN CASH TO PERSON SAY ZEE THERE IS A CHAIN OF BOND TRADERS AND TRANSPORTERS IN CASH WHO ROTATE CASH FROM BLACK MONEY DRUGS ETC FOR A FEE AND DELIVER IT AT DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHIES OF POLITICAL PARTIES SO THAT BOND REDEMPTION REQUESTS ARE NOT BUNCHED AT A GEOGRAPHY ALL THE PLAYERS IN THE ABOVE CASES ARE BANIAS WHO I BELIEBVE SHOULD BE XTERMINATED dindooohindoo IN THE SELECTED WORKS OF AMBEDKAR WHICH IS ON THE MEA PORTAL AMBEDKAR DESCRIBES BANIAS AS UNDER The Bania is the worst parasitic class known to history. In him the vice of money-making is unredeemed by culture or conscience. He is like an undertaker who prospers when there is an epidemic. The only difference between the undertaker and the Bania is that the undertaker does not create an epidemic while the Bania does. He does not use his money for productive purposes. He uses it to create poverty and more poverty by lending money for unproductive purposes. INDIA IS BEING RUN BY BY BANIAS AS OF TODAY WHO CLAIM TO REPRESENT HINDOO PRIDE Ambedkar in his historic speech in Nagpur on October 15 1956 a day after he had embraced Buddhism said Even though I was born in the Hindu religion I will not die in the Hindu religion. This oath I made earlier yesterday I proved it true. I am happy I am ecstatic I have left hell this is how I feel. I do not want any blind follower
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ