Goldman Sachs weighs selling part of wealth unit

Shifts focus back to serving ultra-rich in broad strategy revamp


REUTERS August 22, 2023
A sign is displayed in the reception of the Sydney offices of Goldman Sachs in Australia, May 18, 2016. PHOTO: REUTERS

print-news
NEW YORK:

Goldman Sachs is weighing the sale of a part of its wealth business, it said on Monday, as it shifts its focus back to serving the ultra-rich and away from high-net-worth clients in mass markets.

The Wall Street bank is evaluating alternatives for its registered investment adviser (RIA) unit, called Personal Financial Management (PFM), which manages about $29 billion, it said in a statement.

The shift in strategy comes after CEO David Solomon reorganised the firm into three units last year and scaled back ambitions for its consumer business, which lost $3 billion in the last three years.

Goldman is also pushing ahead with a sale of its fintech business, GreenSky and has also offloaded the bulk of its unsecured consumer loans after it halted this kind of lending last year.

“This is part of the overall restructuring of the firm, back towards its roots,” said Stephen Biggar, an analyst at Argus Research.

Read Bitcoin will compete with gold as store of value: Goldman Sachs

“They’ve been unable to carve a path of profitability and scale” for the RIA, which catered to high-net-worth individuals in mass markets outside of Goldman’s core, ultra-wealthy clientele, Biggar said.

Goldman declined to comment on PFM’s earnings.

The company’s shares were down 1.4% in afternoon trading, compared with the S&P index of bank stocks, which was down 0.6%.

Goldman bought RIA, formerly known as United Capital Financial Partners, for $750 million in 2019 when it managed about $25 billion in funds.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 22nd, 2023.

Like Business on Facebookfollow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ