Mastercard loses UK ruling on 3m dead claimants in $12b case

Merricks alleges Mastercard charged excessive ‘interchange’ fees


Reuters December 01, 2022
PHOTO: REUTERS

LONDON:

Mastercard lost an appeal in a London court on Tuesday against a ruling in a 10 billion pound-plus ($12 billion-plus) collective action that allows the claims of around three million people who have died since the lawsuit began to continue.

The global payments processor is facing a lawsuit brought by consumer champion Walter Merricks on behalf of approximately 46 million adults in the United Kingdom, which became the first mass consumer action to be approved in the UK in 2021.

The case was certified last year after a nearly five-year journey from the first-instance Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), which initially refused to give the go-ahead, to the UK Supreme Court and back.

In March, the CAT said the date for determining whether members of the

claimant class are based in the UK should be when the case was filed in 2016, meaning the claims of roughly three million people who had died since could be continued by their estates.

Mastercard’s challenge to that decision was dismissed on Tuesday by the Court of Appeal, which ruled that the CAT was entitled to take into account that three million people who had valid claims in 2016 would be excluded.

Judge Julian Flaux said the overall purpose of the UK’s collective proceedings regime – roughly equivalent to US class actions – is to “provide access to justice for individual claimants who would not otherwise be able to obtain legal redress”.

“The effect of Mastercard’s case would be to thwart, at least to a significant extent, the overall purpose of the regime,” he added.

A spokesperson for Mastercard said that “we will continue to fight it [the case] and are confident that, once the facts are presented in court, the case will be thrown out.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read