Pakistan’s central bank has imposed a penalty of slightly over Rs290 million on six commercial and Shariah-compliant banks for violating banking regulations related to foreign exchange, asset quality and general operation in the quarter ended September 30, 2022. All six are well-known banks including the two that are ranked among the top five. A tier-2 bank was fined Rs140 million for violating regulations including foreign exchange rules, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) said in its one-page report titled “Details of Significant Enforcement Actions by SBP During the Quarter ended September 30, 2022”.
Recently, the central bank had initiated a probe into the conduct of eight banks, including the leading ones, for violating foreign exchange market regulations. The investigation began following allegations that the banks had manipulated the rupee value against the US dollar to pocket high profit margins. Although the SBP did not name the eight banks, it gave names of at least two banks in its latest report on the enforcement action for violating foreign exchange regulations. The second bank which violated the foreign exchange regulations is a well-known Shariahcompliant financial institution. It was charged the second highest amount of around Rs82 million.
The two banks also violated the regulations dealing with customer due diligence, Know Your Client (KYC), asset quality and general banking operation. “In addition to the penal action, the banks have been advised to strengthen their controls/ processes in the identified areas,” the central bank said. “These actions (monetary penalty) are based on deficiencies in the compliance of regulatory instructions and do not constitute a comment on the financial soundness of the entities,” it said. Four other banks were charged fines in the range of Rs10 million to Rs26 million for violating regulations pertaining to customer due diligence/ KYC, asset quality and general banking operation.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ