Civil-military imbalance

The original bill however was reconsidered to enable MA Jinnah to be the first governor general of Pakistan


HR Ahmad July 13, 2022
HR Ahmad is a Professor of Physiology at AKU

print-news

What contributed to the emergence of civilmilitary imbalance (CMI) in Pakistan? A brief history might enlighten us. The British Parliament Bill of 1947 divided British India into Pakistan and India, originally under the governorship of Louis Mountbatten. Both countries would remain under the crown until they have written their constitutions. India came out of the crown after three years and Pakistan after nine years. The original bill however was reconsidered to enable MA Jinnah to be the first governor general of Pakistan instead of Mountbatten.

In summary, British Parliament Bill passed on Pakistan to a ‘class’ and not to the people of Pakistan. India’s bourgeois class was stronger. They even had a roadmap before the independence, of land reforms and industrialisation. Contrastingly, Pakistan seemed designed to serve as a geo-strategic launching pad for the resource control of erstwhile imperial powers. British brains work beyond immediate need. How they work without unwritten constitution to keep UK together for more than 300 years but at the cost of dividing countries everywhere they were.

Two factors of CMI in Pakistan are the events of 1949 and 1958 to establish a sort of religious-military state. These two shots were the objective resolution and the martial law. Of note is the fact that the first budget of Pakistan was highly weighted towards defense rather than health and education. We can also read from the history how Justice Cornelius reacted: “The martial law is not good for the country and also not good for the future generation”. What reply came from the pressure-cooker of Justice Munir: “It is a doctrine of necessity.” Martial law was indeed one of the rippling effects of the cold war strategies. The CIA network removed Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh of Iran in 1951 due to the nationalisation of Anglo Persian Oil Company.

Shah was brought back to Iran from Italy. Pakistan appeared on the world map due to its geostrategic significance. Alas! If Mosaddegh would have continued, the fate of Iran and the regions would have been different. Military American Advisory Group and many pacts between USA and Pakistan were the forces of cold war behind the consolidation of martial law and consequently the evolution of CMI. Bismarck would say that in every alliance there is a rider and horse. The alliance was handsomely doled three times each for a period of 10 years during Cold War, Afghan War and War on Terror. One can study timeline curves from data of SIPRI Report Stockholm.

It shows for Pakistan that per soldier per year expenditure is significantly higher than per person per year for health and education. One should design a world map from SIPRI Report data to enlighten people where countries are marching economically and educationally. Multinational Corporations (MNCs) are offshoots from East India Company to serve as engines of imperialism and corporate capitalism to control resource and market. They use the war methodology in such a way that occupied country’s soldiers and resources ensure company’s victory.

If one makes a balance sheet to show who gained and what was the cost, it may be inferred that MNCs tear apart a society in haves and haves-not by implanting a prototype of military industrial complex. People are then divided between private and public camps. Health and education are both highly commercialised. CMI has indeed darkened many homes from basic needs of life and weakened the civil institutions. The feudalmilitary-clergy alliance under CMI has lowered the probability for blossoming of an egalitarian civil society in this country.

This might be the case for many countries under the oligarchic territorial system in the world. In order to come out of it, we need to understand the problems to derive solutions. A symposium on the origin and evolution of CMI could enlighten the public awareness and consciousness to start a journey of democracy to conceive a civil society from the prevailing oligarchy under the global constraints of weaponisation, poverty and global warming.

COMMENTS (5)

Muhammad Abdul Azeem | 2 years ago | Reply Dear Prof. Ahmad You have activated the central core of my brain to give a hand to you in dealing with civil military imbalance CMI . I remember President General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq GZH said in one of his speeches during his tragic ended tenure that now in Pakistan there is no question of Marshal Law ML ever. There was a general misconception due to this statement that in future the military will not intervene to topple civilian government remain silent in civilian matters. This misconception was based on the promise of GZH to hold elections for a democratic process. But behind the curtain GZH was sowing seeds for the permanent intervention of Army in the civilian matters for CMI. Later it was practically demonstrated by Pervez Musharraf by ousting Nawaz Sharif and establishing himself in government without imposing Marshal Law. Dear Prof. Ahmad you covered the matters of CMI post-independence. But in my point of view it prevailed even when Britain was in power over the Hindus Muslims in the subcontinent. British Army was ruling the India by ousting the Muslim Kingdom and nurtured traitors from both Hindu and Muslim populations for their famous strategy DIVIDE RULE . It was also CMI that deprived the people of sub-continent from their basic rights. Though the British army rulers of subcontinent were getting directions from the then Monarch of United Kingdom they explored whole subcontinent in the name of the progress of this region but they were assessing the resources there-in. The same hierarchy of CMI was inherited in the two democratically resolved infant governments of India and Pakistan but they travelled on different tracks having different facts and figures. The India attained stability in all fields including its democratic institutions as they had all resources and strong political leadership having good physical health. On the other hand Pakistani Leadership though stronger than India but remain underfunded threats for war in Kashmir and the deteriorated health of the Governor General Muhammad Ali Jinnah Quaid . Our position in Kashmir was the main reason of greater defense budget of Pakistan than civilian needs. This imbalance is yet continued. Although all of the companions of Quaid being Ministers contributed much from their own pockets but it was not sufficient to run government effectively. Consequently after the death of Quaid the remaining Pakistani leadership went into shock. This was the time when imperial powers along with Central Intelligence Agency CIA planned to keep Pakistan under their control by holding Pakistan Army as puppets to bring 1st Marshal Law through Ayub Khan. The CMI thus continued as it was in subcontinent under British rule. Further all the political parties that emerged later having feudal stamp and army used them to get huge funds in the name of Kashmir war and weapons to defend Pakistani territories thus further broaden CMI. This is what you called feudal military-clergy alliance. This alliance got hold on the IMF crutches and continuing till date. Please note the CMI is so imbalanced that Pakistan Army captured not only the business meant for civilians but having its representatives in every civil National Multinational organizations educational institutions either as head or a prominent influential part of these organizations institutions. And in many of them Rangers have their stations in their premises. I think all other events that you mentioned related to Iran Stockholm cold war and Afghan war are secondary to the development of CMI in Pakistan. Last but not the least I agree with your concluding paragraph that Pakistan government is suffering oligarchy. Thus impartial political scientist along with intellectuals should meet for a symposium to address the issue of CMI in Pakistan. However I think such symposium will only be able to assess the pros cons and ways to overcome CMI. Later a revolutionary attempt will be required to start a real democratic process in Pakistan by asking Army to remain alert but only come out of their shell when Pakistan need defense against foreign threats from enemies without intermingling with either establishment or democratic institutions. Muhammad Abdul Azeem A Pakistani Citizen
Ali masood hayat | 2 years ago | Reply The article like many written earlier is inconclusive.We infact never allowed rule of law to prevail.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ