Turning the other cheek in Pakistan

Imagine if hunger-strikers said they would maintain fast until all parties concerned sat down to broker a solution.

Jyoti Malhotra August 21, 2011

As Karachi goes up in flames, the army doctor-turned-militant behind the 2009 GHQ bombings is arrested and the banned Jaish-e-Mohammed begins to resurface in Pakistan, the question persists in my mind: have Pakistan’s politicians as well as civil society activists ever thought of using the hunger-strike as a weapon of non-violence to cleanse their own society?

Now, in a country in which the majority thinks nothing of fasting from dawn to dusk for several weeks at a time — of which proof, if it were needed, is offered at the present moment — the idea of the hunger-strike may be an odd one.

Other people may record the hours and minutes of self-abnegation with a certain amount of pride, but seriously, we know that the hours of bodily deprivation during Ramazan is meant to concentrate the mind on a certain higher calling.

So consider the following: whether or not the fratricide in Lyari or other parts of Karachi are a result of ethnic gang wars or political vendetta, imagine if a group of people were to sit down somewhere in the city and undertake a relay hunger strike to call attention to the unnecessary killings.

You could fast for six or eight or twelve or however many hours at a time as you wanted. Imagine if the hunger-strikers stated they would not give up their fast until all the parties concerned sat down to broker a solution. Imagine if the mass hunger-strike were to be totally peaceful and disciplined.

Meaning, if the police came charging at you with their lathis and water cannons, and accused you of breaking up the peace, well, you would just take the blows on your chest and carry on. If several hundred or thousand people demonstrating peacefully were injured, imagine the reaction.

Now, some of you may argue that Pakistanis are a proud, red-blooded people who will never tolerate being pushed around, and this turn-the-other-cheek business is really a Gandhian idea that India is more than welcome to keep.

First of all, this would not be completely true. Gandhi is as much part of Pakistan’s history, as it is India’s, in fact, we had him only for a few more months. Secondly, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan’s legacy is alive and well in the ANP, and you can hardly challenge the patriotic credentials of his grandson, Asfandyar Wali Khan.

Admittedly, the idea of a hunger strike in Pakistan has been provoked by the ongoing agitation in Delhi and elsewhere in India by a 73-year-old man called Anna Hazare, who professes to be a Gandhian, and whose protests against corruption and black money has certainly gripped India’s imagination.

Gandhi and his colleagues sowed the seed of non-violent agitation in the freedom struggle against the British, and also showed that peaceful protest is integral to any self-respecting democracy.

It is Hazare’s tactics of blackmail (“if you don’t accept my version of the Bill against corruption, I will go on a fast-unto-death”), that I think the Mahatma and the rest of South Asia finds abhorrent.

This is not the time or place to go into Gandhi’s faults or weaknesses or the mutual betrayal of the Congress and the Muslim League. The question is whether or not we can learn from our common histories and use some of those tools to our current advantage.

So think about it: does the idea of fasting for peace in Karachi appeal to Pakistan?

Published in The Express Tribune, August 22nd,  2011.


Isupzai | 12 years ago | Reply

Fellow Indians, because of Bacha Khan (Frontier Gandhi) the then Frontier Province (now Pakhtunkhwa) was the only Congress Party controlled state within non-partitioned India; we did not want partition, but as Bacha Khan stated in his famous remark "we were thrown to the wolves". From then on we are an oppressed peoples in our country. Half the province still is run by the British law of Frontier Crimes Regulations (FCR) - where if you cant find Gunga Din then you capture Gunga's son or daughter or father or mother for the alleged crime by Gunga. We thank India that it recognized Bacha Khan with the Bharat Ratna. India is great because there are great Indians. Pakistan wants to be great without great Pakistani's. They dont understand that it is the people that make the country, value your people. The Pashtuns have the same aspirations and desires as the rest of the world, a decent meal a decent job, safety, education for the kids. A Governments primary job is to protect its citizens from harm from outsiders. Pakistan's successive governments have failed miserably in performing this duty.

G. Din | 12 years ago | Reply

"although I would prefer any secular leader to the likes of Advani or Mody" Your preference is your business! However, your impugning Mody is not secular would show that your definition of "secular" is rather peculiar and may not be acceptable to all people of Gujrat who returned him to power in every election he sought their vote! On the flip side, you may term all of them non-secular or rabid communalists.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ