PCO judges case: Gilani lets court rule, again

In a conten­tious court ruling, PM cancel­s appoin­tment of five PCO judges.


Qamar Zaman August 08, 2011

ISLAMABAD: In an attempt to avert another executive-judiciary row, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani “de-notified” on Sunday  non-functional members of the superior judiciary who had taken oath under the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) of 2007.

The PM de-notified judges of the high courts of Lahore and Sindh in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, said a statement. “The prime minister attaches great importance to independence of the judiciary,” it said.

According to the statement, the premier has cancelled the appointments of Justice Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi, Justice Syed Hamid Ali Shah, Justice Hasnat Ahmad Khan and Justice Syed Sajjad Hussain Shah as judges of the Lahore High Court (LHC) and Justice Yasmin Abbasey of the Sindh High Court (SHC).

These judges will be entitled to service and pension benefits up to April 20, 2010, when the 18th Constitutional amendment was passed.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan, Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Justice Amir Hani Muslim, had given the government till August 9 to de-notify the judges. On May 18, the court had declared that seven high court judges, who  had taken oaths under the PCO, were never validated as judges. The deadline was given after the government assured the court that it will de-notify the dysfunctional judges the moment the chief executive returned to the capital and approved a pending summary sent to him on July 19.

Meanwhile, legal experts and bar representatives have appreciated the federal government’s move but have also termed the Supreme Court’s orders unconstitutional and in violation of its own earlier orders. They point out that in its July 31 judgment, the court had declared that no judge can be removed or made dysfunctional through a notification by the executive and only the Supreme Judicial Council can initiate proceedings against judges under Article 209 of the Constitution.

“The court’s directive is confused. It [the court] has allowed for a way to get rid of any judge that it dislikes,” says former law minister Khalid Ranjha.

“I have no sympathies with PCO judges but only the council can remove judges through a reference. They cannot be removed through a Supreme Court judgment,” said Pakistan Bar Council member Azam Nazeer Tarar. “Through this order, the court has made the executive abide by its judgment, but it has itself ignored legal provisions by penalising judges by this act,” he said.

“The court’s orders are based on personal likes and dislikes and is tantamount to subversion of the Constitution,” says Advocate Ramazan Chaudhry, who was also removed for taking oath under the PCO. “The government, by de-notifying these judges, has proved that it is responsible and respects the Supreme Court.”

“The government has taken a constitutional step while the Supreme Court’s judgment was totally unconstitutional. It [the court] had itself ruled that only the Supreme Judicial Council is the proper forum to decide the fate of judges,” said former PCO judge Muhammad Ahsan Bhoon, who was also the president of Lahore High Court Bar Association (LHCBA).

“The government had no option but to act upon court orders. If the government has any reservations, it can discuss the order in parliament,” Supreme Court Bar Association Secretary Qamar Zaman Qureshi said. (With additional reporting by Rana Tanveer in Lahore)

Published in The Express Tribune, August 8th, 2011.

COMMENTS (2)

Faizan Ali | 9 years ago | Reply

The recent decision of the de-notification of PCO judges fortified the Govt claims that it respects Judiciary and implements judicial decision in true letter and spirit. In wake of past few incidents Govt was blamed for not submitting before verdicts of Supreme Court, however it is evident from recent decision that PPP Govt unlike its rival party respects Judicial decision. The tussle between the executive and the judiciary is not a new phenomenon. It started the day judicial activism began under the umbrella of its newly won freedom after the months-long lawyers’ movement throughout the country. Not only the PCO judges’ case, recently the Hajj arrangements corruption case and the National Insurance Company Limited (NICL) case we witnessed that Govt, despite interference in its authorities, it implemented Court’s decisions. Now It has come to terms with the judiciary by implementing the SC judgement on PCO judges like past decisions of court. However Judiciary should also realize that Every institution has to play its role according to the book to keep the democratic set up going.

Mirza | 9 years ago | Reply This PCO Supreme Court is contradicting its own decision of July 31, I am not surprised. It is not a matter of national importance but of egos that is taken on the priority basis. Does the SC of Pakistan have any other important non political cases of appeals that are pending for decades? Here is just one example how a SC in India can make a difference in the lives of all poor kids. No wonder we are behind even Bangladesh in child malnutrition, which used to be the poorest province of Pakistan.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ