ISLAMABAD:
The Federal Ministry of Interior has admitted that authorities twice issued business visa to US blogger Cynthia Dawn Ritchie – respectively in 2018 and 2019 – in violation of the policy
In its report dated August 31 that it submitted to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), the ministry noted that during her stay in Pakistan, the US blogger applied for extension in her stay under work visa category, “however, she was issued extension under business visa category in violation of the policy”.
It said the supporting documents qualifying as legal requirements for issuance of extension under business visa category were not met because her applications on both occasions were for extension in her stay in Pakistan under work visa category.
“She was working in collaboration with different companies in Pakistan which were registered with the SECP [Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan].
“However, her own company by the name of A Different Lens Production, LLC through which she was collaborating with other companies is not registered in Pakistan as reported by herself,” it added.
The Ministry of Interior on Wednesday rejected Cynthia Dawn Ritchie's visa extension request and ordered her to leave Pakistan within 15 days.
The ministry took the decision to deport the US citizen – who is a vocal critic of the PPP leaders including its slain chairperson Benazir Bhutto – a day after the IHC ordered it to explain the country’s business visa policy and gave it one last chance to satisfy the court.
A PPP supporter Iftikhar Ahmed had moved the IHC against Ritchie, claiming that the blogger was staying in Pakistan even after expiry of her business visa on March 2.
The court on July 10 directed the Ministry of Interior to decide about Ritchie’s stay in Pakistan through a speaking order. On July 17, the ministry gave the US blogger a clean chit and allowed her to stay in the country till August 31.
In its report submitted to the IHC, the ministry had said: “Cynthia D. Ritchie denied all the allegations against her; she stated that her visa expired on March 2, 2020 and she submitted an application before the date of expiry.
“However, due to Covid-19 situation, no extensions were being processed and all foreigners were granted extension and, therefore, she was still staying in Pakistan under a valid visa as extended by the Ministry of Interior.”
The IHC on August 5, however, rejected the Ministry of Interior’s report on Ritchie and gave it three-week time to reconcile its report. Resuming hearing of the petition on September 1, the IHC asked the ministry about the country’s business visa policy.
The court also restrained the blogger from speaking against political figures of the country and her lawyer, Imran Feroze, had assured the court of not making any statements.
Chief Justice Athar Minallah had said the order issued by the interior secretary was a confession of issuing a work visa to Ritchie against the law. The interior secretary’s decision had raised serious questions, the chief justice had said.
He said either the ministry was unaware of the visa policy or it had ignored it in the recent case. Laws and policies must be applied in all cases in a non-discriminatory and transparent manner, he stressed.
“The recent decision of the interior secretary contradicted the previous decision. The interior secretary relied solely on Ritchie’s statement and did not cite any law. The interior ministry could not answer the court’s questions about the secretary’s decision,” he had noted.
Separately, the IHC on Tuesday also set aside a sessions court’s decision not to allow Ritchie’s request to register a case against PPP leader and former interior minister Rehman Malik.
On June 17, Cynthia had filed an application with the Secretariat Police Station, accusing Malik of raping her at his residence in 2011. Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Nasir Javed Rana had, however, dismissed the petition.
The blogger had moved the IHC against the verdict and IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah issued a six-page order, allowing the petition and setting aside the sessions court order.
“The petition filed by the petitioner [Ritchie] shall be treated as pending. The learned Sessions Judge, Islamabad (West) is expected to assign the matter to a designated Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, other than the judicial officer who had passed the impugned order, dated 05-08-2020,” he noted.
He also ordered the lower court to decide the complaint against Rehman Malik in three weeks.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ